GDT: HFBoards GDT | 11/25/16

[Yeti of the Flow]

Claude Julien is such a whiney *****. On what planet does he think that wasnt interference by Marchand? Christ shut your yap and be reasonable.

A few reasons. Giordano was the one who actually committed the interference by getting in Marchand's lane.

Another is that the Bruins had a goal they saw should be overturned when Rask's glove was hit recently, challenged, and it was allowed because Rask wasn't entirely in the crease (Only reason it could have been, because you can't say his glove, which is where the puck was scored, wasn't hit immediately before the shot scored). Whereas this goal was overturned citing the rule which should have overturned the goal against the Bruins days before, as well, but wasn't.

 

[McRpro]

Coyotes rocking their best jerseys

Vomit inducing etch-a-sketch ugliness.

 

[Tatar Shots]

No idea why the Devils tried to challenge that? Nyquist was clearly in possession of the puck

 

[Dust]

Was the official behind the net drunk in the Oilers / Coyotes. Emphatically waves that there's a goal on the ice, replay clearly shows no goal.

 

[SniperHF]

Was the official behind the net drunk in the Oilers / Coyotes.

Yes.

 

[Del Preston]

He didn't eat enough. Obviously he's seeing black dots all over the place.

 

[SoupNazi]

No idea why the Devils tried to challenge that? Nyquist was clearly in possession of the puck

Normally I'm in favor of throwing **** at the wall and seeing what sticks, but that was just a bad challenge.

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

Impressive what CBJ is doing in TB tonight. Outshooting them by a 2-1 margin, up 4-3.

 

[spintheblackcircle]

Wennberg has kinda become a star.

 

[Jeremy Hronek]

the nhl app has the flames bruins game at 2-2 lol.

 

[canadianmagpie]

A few reasons. Giordano was the one who actually committed the interference by getting in Marchand's lane.

Another is that the Bruins had a goal they saw should be overturned when Rask's glove was hit recently, challenged, and it was allowed because Rask wasn't entirely in the crease (Only reason it could have been, because you can't say his glove, which is where the puck was scored, wasn't hit immediately before the shot scored). Whereas this goal was overturned citing the rule which should have overturned the goal against the Bruins days before, as well, but wasn't.

I didn't see the Rask goal that was challenged. But it order to compare that one with this one, Rask's glove should have been shoved with enough force by his own defenseman that he fell over because an opponent shoved the defenseman into him. Was that what happened?

Come on man, you can't shove an opponent into a goalie even if you thought he was interfering with you. It was the right no-goal call.

 

[canadianmagpie]

the nhl app has the flames bruins game at 2-2 lol.

I saw that, I guess Pastrnak has scored 24 goals because they count double!

 

[Del Preston]

the nhl app has the flames bruins game at 2-2 lol.

Pasternak scored two goals at 5:55 of the third period. Terrific website and app they've got.

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

Strange to see the Devils in 2 straight high scoring games.

 

[Samkow]

The phrase "x handed y the game" is thrown around a lot these days, but I think I can safely say Hedman probably just gave Columbus the game there.

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

NHL.com still has the Bruins-Flames game tied at 2.

 

[SladeWilson23]

I absolutely hate the way the Devils have played the past two games. But they are very resilient.

 

[spacemunky]

NHL.com still has the Bruins-Flames game tied at 2.

I noticed that

 

[Yeti of the Flow]

I didn't see the Rask goal that was challenged. But it order to compare that one with this one, Rask's glove should have been shoved with enough force by his own defenseman that he fell over because an opponent shoved the defenseman into him. Was that what happened?

Come on man, you can't shove an opponent into a goalie even if you thought he was interfering with you. It was the right no-goal call.

I didn't say it should be a goal. I said why the Bruins staff has a legitimate grip with it being no-goal. This goal cited a rule which should have overturned the goal the Bruins challenged when Rask's glove was hit, but for some reason the rule wasn't brought up, then. You're right, though, the contact on Rask should be even more obvious because it was direct contact with him from the opposing player, rather than what happened here.

 

[Snakepit]

NHL.com still has the Bruins-Flames game tied at 2.

The fact they had the mistake at all is one thing, but it's been like 20 minutes now and they haven't fixed it lol

 

[Chloraflora]

Ah I do love these Coyotes outfits so.

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

The Flames win by a score of 2-2!

 

[trv]

NHL.com still has the Bruins-Flames game tied at 2.

Looking forward to OT!!

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

They FINALLY fixed it.

 

[The Toews Era*]

Man have the bruins fallen far since 2013