GDT: HFBoards GDT | 1/29/15

[Holocene]

We've been screwed on like 10 of those calls in the last two years. I'd feel sympathy but I hate Montreal.

 

[NicEller]

That's irrelevant and you know it...

And he did put it in the net...

 

[Uber Coca]

Entertaining game so far, it's getting chippy.

 

[habsman56]

Maybe next time put the puck into the empty net?

Well to be fair.. he did. He put it in the net, being an inch over the line is just as much a goal as wiring it top shelf.

 

[schabadoo]

It really was conclusive. Not on the last frame, but a couple frames before that shows the puck in.

You saw a frame with the puck clearly over?

It was in, but I don't see how they could overturn the call.

 

[Uber Coca]

We've been screwed on like 10 of those calls in the last two years. I'd feel sympathy but I hate Montreal.

The Rangers are the only team that got screwed in the last two years, that's for sure.

 

[Disappearing Semin]

Could they hire physics major to watch these reviews, at least they would know that the puck wasnt travelling over the speed of light and stretched to 8 inch long

 

[Kane One]

You saw a frame with the puck clearly over?

It was in, but I don't see how they could overturn the call.

The only frame that showed the puck on the line was the last frame. You could see the puck touch Lundqvist's toe before that, where his toe is deeper in the net.

If the last frame showed the puck barely on the line, and the frame before that shows the puck even past that point, then the puck is in.

 

[Big Guy]

You saw a frame with the puck clearly over?

It was in, but I don't see how they could overturn the call.

By using common sense and making the correct call. MSG as a whole knew it was in too.

 

[Le Tricolore]

 

[Richter Scale]

Coming from an NYR fan, logic says that was a goal. But based on the moronic way the Toronto war room reviews goal calls, they made the right call. Not a single camera angle definitively (or as they say it "conclusively") showed the puck completely across the line (i.e. you can see white between the red line and the puck).

They have made several of those types of calls against the Rangers this season, so I don't really feel that bad about it. But the NHL either needs to allow logic into the equation, get some better friggin cameras, OR get some puck sensors going so we don't need to keep dealing with this crap.

 

[Subban signed e5]

Coming from an NYR fan, logic says that was a goal. But based on the moronic way the Toronto war room reviews goal calls, they made the right call. Not a single camera angle definitively (or as they say it "conclusively") showed the puck completely across the line (i.e. you can see white between the red line and the puck).

They have made several of those types of calls against the Rangers this season, so I don't really feel that bad about it. But the NHL either needs to allow logic into the equation, get some better friggin cameras, OR get some puck sensors going so we don't need to keep dealing with this crap.

i think the last replay they should on nbc was pretty conclusive

 

[Strik_IX]

How about the NHL buys pro gear for their ****ing replays... MTL getting robbed AGAIN...

 

[schabadoo]

By using common sense and making the correct call. MSG as a whole knew it was in too.

Common sense, sadly, isn't the rule.

Saw one where the goalies glove was all the way over the line, but the puck wasn't visible. They called no goal. SJ maybe?

 

[2Leetch_94]

Well to be fair.. he did. He put it in the net, being an inch over the line is just as much a goal as wiring it top shelf.

Except one that is an inch over the line has a chance to not count and the other doesn't. It should of been an easy goal, not depending on a freeze frame to have it counted after it's been waved off on the ice.

 

[Subban signed e5]

Except one that is an inch over the line has a chance to not count and the other doesn't. It should of been an easy goal, not depending on a freeze frame to have it counted after it's been waved off on the ice.

does it matter were he put it in? a goal is a goal and that was a goal

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

Meanwhile, Robin Lehner continues to suck.

 

[2Leetch_94]

does it matter were he put it in? a goal is a goal and that was a goal

Apparently it wasn't goal enough to count, which is all that actually matters. If Weise takes a better shot everyone in Montreal isn't in an uproar. Every team in the league gets calls, good or bad, throughout the year. I'm happy it went in my team's favor this time.

 

[SJSharksfan39]

So weird to see Marty Brodeur drop the puck in St. Louis.

 

[Sheppy]

Dear god Rask is filthy.

 

[2ka RasK*]

Isles are getting RasK'ed

 

[WayneSid9987]

What a save by Rask. WOW!

 

[SladeWilson23]

What a save by Rask!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[2ka RasK*]

2- 1

That was inevitable.

The Isles keep pressing.

 

[WayneSid9987]

And then Tavares pulls a rabbit out of the hat.