- Oct 9, 2012
- 26,906
- 36,130
They should be forced to play him 30 minutes a night insteadLosing Nurse would be addition by subtraction for the Oilers.
They should be forced to play him 30 minutes a night insteadLosing Nurse would be addition by subtraction for the Oilers.
...you don't know if he's hurt or injured...it was a dirty play and he could have seriously injured Byfield...and again, if you don't understand how that could have injured his larnyx (throat in general, really) than you didn't do as well as you tyhink you did in regards to Physics...or your teacher sucked and you didn't learn much...
You don’t watch a lot of Kings hockey do you?The Kings aren't really the forgive and forget types. McDavid might be smart to start his summer early if all these other players are going to be out anyway.
The Kings aren't really the forgive and forget types. McDavid might be smart to start his summer early if all these other players are going to be out anyway.
PLAYOFF PICTURE!
Can CLINCH a playoff spot with a win over the Blackhawks
No Clinchy Clinchy
Will be ELIMINATED if the Canadiens beat the Blackhawks
Stayin Alive
They’re going nowhere. At the end of the day. A zero cup legacy sounds just fine to me.once every year im like man, it wouldbe so cool if McDavid won a cup
Then the oilers remind me they’re the most unlikable squad in the game since the 2011 Canucks and I hope he stays miserable
WoahThey’re going nowhere. At the end of the day. A zero cup legacy sounds just fine to me.
What's ridiculous and sad is arguing with someone who's optimistic that he's not injured as if you're optimistic that he is....that take is soo ridiculous...LOTS of guys (and girls) have walked back to the Room on their own and have been out for MONTHS because of injury...sad...
Even healthy the oilers have looked bad on most nights for awhile now and only McDrai and Eckholm hurt the team by not playing.Not just McDavid and Draisaitl. They're missing NINE regulars including two of the top four players in the world, and their best defensemen in Ekholm.
To think that this game reflects in any way what game 1 of the playoffs is going look like is absurd
What's ridiculous and sad is arguing with someone who's optimistic that he's not injured as if you're optimistic that he is.
Imagine being this mad that you have to type up a false rulebook entry lmaoRule 78.5 (Disallowed Goals) and Rule 37 (Video Review) in the NHL Rulebook. Once a shootout attempt is ruled "no goal" and the next shooter takes their attempt, the play is considered dead, and the original ruling cannot be overturned. The officials’ decision on the ice stands unless video review is immediately initiated before the next attempt begins. If the puck crosses the line but is missed, and play continues with the next shooter, it’s too late to reverse the call. No goal.
And apparently the NHL is always clueless because someone remembers them changing a goal after several atempts in a Habs Ducks game around 2011. Habs got screwed there too but won the shootout.
I don't think that it's clear that he's injured just because they claimed it and he didn't return. There's so much on the line here and a little gamesmanship isn't out of the question. After the decision comes tomorrow, we might see him suddenly declared good to go for the Seattle game. I certainly hope so....it was REPORTED that he was injured and wouldn't return, we just don't know the severity yet...how much clearer do you need it??...