wetcoast
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2018
- 26,113
- 12,679
Well I guess I don't know s**t but officiating isn't perfect either.They called it a goal for continuation.
Well I guess I don't know s**t but officiating isn't perfect either.They called it a goal for continuation.
Refs are weird. This one i get, but when it comes to goaltendee interference just accept what the call is because it's always differentWell I guess I don't know s**t but officiating isn't perfect either.
Posting this for people like me.Well, this did not age well.
That was clearly a goal for those familiar with the Continuation play rule. Not a controversial call at all.
Ullmark gotta have that, shitty ass goal to give up.
Yeah that would be bad.Here's a parallel, which my husband (who grew up in the Tampa Bay area) agrees with: imagine the Bolts are just a few points out of a playoff spot, and you have to hope someone like the Panthers wins, because they're playing against a team you're chasing in the standings.
Yeah that would be bad.
LOL...that was Will Borgen.The Ranger jumps on the pile instead of actually doing anything.
No because 3 penalties in the first 15 minutes in bullshat. They hadn't even gotten the 3rd penalty when I posted. Shocked that Seattle finally got a pp.Sure because a penalty half way through the first period in a 0-0 draw will determine the game right?
Kartye. no need to know his name,. he only has 4 goals.Seattle has tied the game in Philadelphia. Nice shot over the goalie's shoulder after circling around the net.
I wish I knew their names, but don't.
Kartye. no need to know his name,. he only has 4 goals.
yesDo those 4 goals include the one he just scored?