GDT: HFBoards GDT: 02/01/2025 | 9 Playdates

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
You're a pretty bad lawyer, if this is what you think an argument is. I hope you save the lol for the forums.

But, while we're over sharing, I'm a landscaper who plants trees with corpses for fertilizer. Now use your lawyer skills to track me down.
goodfellaslaugh.gif

notworthy.gif

bravisimo.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pablo El Perro
I just asked you one simple hard question. There wasn't an argument in there. I just asked what the save % was. My prior point did say the team should have won quicker.

Why couldn't you just answer the question?
It's not a hard question at all. I don't care to do your homework and I'm not involved in your silly case, he's a Lawyer. I could ask you what Bobrovsky's save percentage was, but I know it, and it wasn't good.

As to your prior point, the goal scoring says otherwise, which has little to with Skinner. But go on with should have, when it's counterfactual, given that the Oilers lost.

Side note, I hope your paralegal is better at putting words together to make a point.
 
I well tell you something brother. We are just playing around here. Bantering. But facts are facts and that is what runs this entire world and it's what this world has been built upon. Facts and patterns. That's what we base everything on going forward.

In terms of sports, especially hockey, there are a myriad of factors that play into game results. As I playfully say, refs. Very bad goaltending. It's all in there. But, look over 40 years, you see patterns.

You see players hit their primes after their mid 20's, etc

That's all I am saying.

It's not that hard to see in hockey. You spreadsheet these numbers and you almost know the results.
 
You're a pretty bad lawyer, if this is what you think an argument is. I hope you save the lol for the forums.

But, while we're over sharing, I'm a landscaper who plants trees with corpses for fertilizer. Now use your lawyer skills to track me down.
I’m a doctor, I can tell you Mark Stone is days away from a spleen replacement.
 
I well tell you something brother. We are just playing around here. Bantering. But facts are facts and that is what runs this entire world and it's what this world has been built upon. Facts and patterns. That's what we base everything on going forward.

In terms of sports, especially hockey, there are a myriad of factors that play into game results. As I playfully say, refs. Very bad goaltending. It's all in there. But, look over 40 years, you see patterns.

You see players hit their primes after their mid 20's, etc

That's all I am saying.
I will tell you something, hermana, you are a bit full of yourself. Pro tip, that doesn't make friends or win cases. And, regarding the structure of what you are saying, you're doing some free association rambling.

I could go on about conflating ontology and epistemology, but I'm not sure you're ready for that.
 
Hey, that's fine. I respect it. I hope you have a good night
Feliz Noches, and I hope you work on your distinctions between ontology and epistemology. But, one last question, what is Skinners save percentage in game 2s on Tuesdays? Don't be a coward and answer me.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad