I guess I should have been more specific in the title...
Who knew you should have clarified you meant 100% of the team.I guess I should have been more specific in the title...
This is not accurate. Per the lease the lessee is responsible for routine maintenance including the roof. And the lease runs out in 2025. I would expect he would look at the county and state to bring the arena up to standard or take the team somewhere where they will.You do know that Terry does not own the Keybank Center...right? The County owns it and is responsible for paying for at least partial renovations. It's the County's responsibility to maintain the roof and Pegula is paying for it on his own
This is not accurate. Per the lease the lessee is responsible for routine maintenance including the roof. And the lease runs out in 2025. I would expect he would look at the county and state to bring the arena up to standard or take the team somewhere where they will.
Forbes says the Bills are worth $3.7 B. The reality is anything less than a $175 million profit is sad but you own football teams for the utility you get being one of 32 knights in the USA. It's royalty in America. What's the value of being one of 32 Americans to own a football team? Pretty high and beyond profit and loss. Many people suggest Trump took his second choice and ran for president after being spurned by the NFL. LOL.Nothing in this post is remotely accurate.
For starters, How on earth can Pegula have money tied up with the Bills? He paid 1.4 billion in CASH to buy the them. Which means he has no debt to service and is basically printing money with the Bills.
The Pegulas’ are worth 2-3 billion more than they were at the start of the pandemic. Pretty amazing accomplish for the terrible businessman you’re describing.
As for selling 25%, the reason for that should be fairly obvious. Its to pay for his portion of the new stadium. Which will cost at least 550 million. It could be more. I don;t know what the agreement says about who pays for overages.
EDIT: You may see something similar with the Sabres to pay for all the projects that have been announced for the arena recently.
What? The Bills are football team who's league is about to allow private equity to have an ownership stake for the first time meaning that the price to buy an NFL team is going to take a jump. The list of teams that aren't doing this in the next couple years will very, very small.Very random. LOL, Where there is smoke, there is fire. He got stuff wrong though. But Athletic has a story.
Pegula family selling portion of Bills ownership stake: Sources
Sources stressed Pegula eventually might not sell part of the Bills, but for the first time, he’s ready to welcome a limited partner.theathletic.com
I really doesn’t help.When people Google his net worth, it says 6.8 billion. 4ish billion of that is tied up in the Bills. That is not liquid cash.
His net worth has gone up because the Bills and Sabres values have gone up. That’s how this works.
I hope this helps.
Because he has an almost 700mi bill for a new stadium to pay for.If he doesn't need the liquidity, why wouldn't he keep the stake and watch it grow every year??
Because he has an almost 700mi bill for a new stadium to pay for.
Straight up. He wants someone else to pay for the Stadium costs. Pegulas have billions in hard assets but 500 million in liquidity might tap out their cash reserves.
If they weren’t strapped for cash - they don’t do this to pay for the stadium. They would just…pay it.I really doesn’t help.
Since the Bills were bought with cash and have no debt to service. They are able to access up to 700 million against the team. Which is the max amount of debt allowed by the NFL for existing owners. So no, the entire value of the Bills is not “tied up”.
Also you need to stop using cash and liquidity interchangeably. Liquidity isn’t just cash on hand. It also assets that can be quickly converted to cash. In the Pegula’s case that would be the 700mil I just mentioned and the 2+billion of their net worth outside of Bills/Sabres. Thats a decent amount of liquidity.
If the current reporting is accurate, the Pegula’s share of the stadium costs are almost 700mil. They can either take out loans or bring on investors to pay for that. They chose investors and keeping the team debt free. I can’t think of why they would deplete their cash reserves to pay for a project like this.
Lets be honest, Your initial posts made it pretty clear it never even occurred to you that they were doing this to pay for the stadium. You went right to your little conspiracy that the Pegula’s are strapped for cash. All their businesses are failing, blah blah blah.
If they weren’t strapped for cash - they don’t do this to pay for the stadium. They would just…pay it.
I don’t for a second think they’re dead broke. But they aren’t certainly as liquid as you think they are.
lol, I am aware of that - I can assure youYou seem to think the only thing considered liquid is cash. That isn't the case.
Well the way you are framing your argument doesn't come off that waylol, I am aware of that - I can assure you
Yeah, they don’t call it liquified natural gas for nothingYou seem to think the only thing considered liquid is cash. That isn't the case.
The arena repairs is a criticism with its own merits. But it has nothing to do with the hockey ops side.The facts are the roof has been leaking for years. The scoreboard was supposed to be replaced 7 years ago. For 6/9 years Terry has been out spent by his peers (current owners) and very significantly outspent the last 2 or 3.
I bring them up because I think your posts better describe Golisano/Quinn’s tenure than Pegula’s.You can talk about Golisano all you want. I lived through it, I am aware. And it is 100% irrelevant to the current state of the team in 2024. Any comparison at this point is dumb. The team is historically bad. Terry and Tom aren't peers because Tom doesn't own an NHL team. Terry's peers are Jeremy Jacobs and Ron Burke.
I’ve never once said other teams don’t spend more on their front offices than we do.Those people spend more on their roster, more on their scouts, more on their analytics, and more on their player development personnel.
You keep saying they don't. But they do.
The arena repairs is a criticism with its own merits. But it has nothing to do with the hockey ops side.
-It has nothing to do with missing the playoffs for 13yrs
-Tells us nothing about how much will be spent on the hockey side.
-Nor will it impact out ability to hire a new coach.
Constantly posting about it doesn’t change that.
I bring them up because I think your posts better describe Golisano/Quinn’s tenure than Pegula’s.
I’ve never once said other teams don’t spend more on their front offices than we do.
What I did say in response to you pointing out other teams have more staff in those areas……
The Sabres have accumulated/developed some of the best young talent in the NHL, AHL and have one of the best overall prospect pools. Something they did using analytics, player development and scouting. It’s a strength of their front office
The front office in 2021 set out to build up as much young talent as the could as part of the rebuild. By any measure they’ve been wildly successful. Their set up clearly works very well. The extent of your complaint is that they didn’t do it with more people. Who cares?
This season at the NHL level, is the first failure of this front office. Which I would chalk up generally to Adams decision to give the group from last season one more shot at making the playoffs. Then not adding much beyond depth vets.
Outsider here, but I have always wondered if the Jacobs familly would be willing to sell the Bruins to say the Fenway Group and buy their Home Town Team.I think the best hope would be to find a situation like Fenway Sports Group (a group looking to add a NHL team to their portfolio), but I have to think the price considering the market, dormant fan base, and arena won't fetch a high enough return to justify the hitting the premium cash price the NHL will demand.
The real "unfortunate" thing about the Ottawa sale and now the Phoenix deal, the NHL has said "Even in a failing market, a NHL franchise is worth no less than 1 billion dollars"
And the one thing the NHL will not do is allow any deal that causes the franchise values to fall. In most markets, owners who lose money every year are being made whole, on paper at least, by the franchise value growth. If the value was to drop, than I think there would be a bit of a race to cash out by more than a few.
Even if Terry and Kim decided, today, that they are going to put the team on the market, I don't think they could find a buyer at 1B, especially with the state of the Arena. The Penguins got 900M with a less than 15 year old arena and 2 championships in the last decade. Buffalo has the need for either a brand new arena or a major refurbishment, which is going to be a 100M bill in the next few years.
I think the best hope would be to find a situation like Fenway Sports Group (a group looking to add a NHL team to their portfolio), but I have to think the price considering the market, dormant fan base, and arena won't fetch a high enough return to justify the hitting the premium cash price the NHL will demand.