Benning's on his retirement contract. He's not going to be back anywhere.Benning ain’t gonna be back after his contract is up.
He'll be a 32 year old RHD who plays with some physicality and can move the puck a little bit, someone will give him over a million dollars even though he doesn't deserve it, his archetype is just in really high demandBenning's on his retirement contract. He's not going to be back anywhere.
Benning will absolutely be worth $1 million per year unless he can’t physically come back from his injury.He'll be a 32 year old RHD who plays with some physicality and can move the puck a little bit, someone will give him over a million dollars even though he doesn't deserve it, his archetype is just in really high demand
The market dictates that he will be worth it, but his quality of play doesn't back it upBenning will absolutely be worth $1 million per year unless he can’t physically come back from his injury.
The problem is that I'm pretty sure teams think he's good, I could see a low level bidding war that bumps him to like $1.2M for a year after his contract expiresI'm rather skeptical that a poor quality, slow defenseman on the wrong side of 30 coming back from a season-ending hip injury will be able to bounce back effectively and be expected to have a career lasting longer than two additional years.
Sure, it's possible, but I'd be about 75% confident Benning has to settle for a PTO after 2026.
And yet, using the stats on that page, he has been on the ice for 257 GF 272 GA at 5v5 for his career. That's including the games he played this year and last on terrible Sharks teams before which he was basically a break even player. I'll take that on any team's bottom pair for $1.25 million that I can bury in the minors if his play ever slips below that level.The market dictates that he will be worth it, but his quality of play doesn't back it up
He's a league minimum contract #7D quality player who will be paid like a legit bottom pair anchor because of his handedness, size and skating, but his actual impact on ice has been between neutral and catastrophic every year of his career
He only played 14 games on one of the worst teams of all time this year, so I'll throw out those stats even though they're the worst of the bunch, but in the previous 7 seasons he's had an xG% above 50 3 times and a SCF% above 50 3 times while only having a PDO below 1.000 once
He's a replacement level player on his best day, and on his worst day he's not NHL caliber, but BiG mAn ShOoT rIgHt, so he'll get paid
He's a break even player while consistently getting above average shooting%+save% luckAnd yet, using the stats on that page, he has been on the ice for 257 GF 272 GA at 5v5 for his career. That's including the games he played this year and last on terrible Sharks teams before which he was basically a break even player. I'll take that on any team's bottom pair for $1.25 million that I can bury in the minors if his play ever slips below that level.
Replacement level players are absolutely worth $1 million against the cap especially with the cap going up.He's a replacement level player on his best day, and on his worst day he's not NHL caliber, but BiG mAn ShOoT rIgHt, so he'll get paid
I agree, he will get that money, but in my opinion replacement players should be making league minimumReplacement level players are absolutely worth $1 million against the cap especially with the cap going up.
Also if you take a look at how many teams are looking for RHD it is obvious that the barrier to entry in the NHL is much lower for RHD than LHD. He will get at least $1 million per year because he is big and RHD, unless he is physically broken still.
Thank goodness. I was about to go "WHHHHYYYYYYYYYY!"<deleted>
Thank goodness. I was about to go "WHHHHYYYYYYYYYY!"
Posted in the wrong thread I assume. I just thought we'd given Thrun an extra 2 years for no good reason.What was the deleted message? Or were you just wondering why someone was bumping this thread?
Posted in the wrong thread I assume. I just thought we'd given Thrun an extra 2 years for no good reason.
Mods wouldn’t allow that.Posted in the wrong thread I assume. I just thought we'd given Thrun an extra 2 years for no good reason.
I knew the mods were powerful, but I didn't know they got to weigh in on contract extensions.Mods wouldn’t allow that.
I knew the mods were powerful, but I didn't know they got to weigh in on contract extensions.
I like ambitious people who bet on themselves.