YP44
Registered User
He's reasonably terrible.
i think it's the reverse. He is terribly reasonable, not going to wow anyone but he's there.
He's reasonably terrible.
The main problem with him here was that he shouldn't have been a regular on the top pairing. As a 2nd/3rd pairing guy who can see top PK duties he's fairly solid, if a bit boring. Not as physical as you would generally like from a guy with his size but he can use his long reach to break up passes and whatnotHonest question . Is Forbort terrible or reasonable ?
Remember when Emerson Etem was a King?
Yup. We won the cup that year though, so it all worked out in the endMoreau and Hunter?
Their contributions can never not be mentioned.Yup. We won the cup that year though, so it all worked out in the end
Shouldn't be bitter about that. While their contributions were great Quick's performance was and is still the best in the long history of Stanley Cup playoffs.Their contributions can never not be mentioned.
I am still bitter than Quick got the Conn Smythe over these two.
(the emoji at the end of my post meant that my post was sarcastic)Shouldn't be bitter about that. While their contributions were great Quick's performance was and is still the best in the long history of Stanley Cup playoffs.