rt
Clean Hits on Substack
Nope. Nothing. At all. Which is the point. Haha.??? Something happen?
Nope. Nothing. At all. Which is the point. Haha.??? Something happen?
Crouse should have been sent back. We had to give up the better pick because of it too. I was absolutely furious that season about the decision to keep him up. Stupid, stupid, stupid.I'm not giving up on Hayton but I worry that we ruined him in yet another example of Coyotes stellar "development". I still wonder how Crouse would be if he had gone back too.
Gotcha. Pointless in 3 games.Nope. Nothing. At all. Which is the point. Haha.
He should have been told to work on putting up points. I'd be delighted if he put up points. In the case of Hayton, I would find judgement based on production to be anything but cursory. Instead I would say that it gets directly to that point in the most primary, elementally important way. It's precisely what I would judge him on. And nothing much else, really.Has any one been able to watch Roadrunners' games and see how he's even being deployed? My guess is he was told precisely what he needed to work on, and the Tucson coaching staff is accommodating that. To measure his performance down there by points scored is so cursory, but I suppose that's all you can tell from game logs. I'm sure there is more focus on getting him to make smarter and quicker decisions with the puck. He's a center so he's going to be expected to play a big role in defensive zone breakouts and offensive zone entries. I'd be delighted if he worked on that all season down in Tucson so he can come up next season and contribute in such a fashion. We desperately need offensive depth in those areas. I'm sure there is plenty of other stuff for him to work on that doesn't show up on the scoreboard.
How'd he being deployed? If he's down there because his defense is suspect, they're going to give him defensive zone deployments. Judging based on points might not be the highest priority. I wouldn't discount it entirely, but if it's the primary concern, they certainly could set him up to get the most looks. I don't know if that's the case. If it is and he's not scoring, that's worrying.He should have been told to work on putting up points. I'd be delighted if he put up points. In the case of Hayton, I would find judgement based on production to be anything but cursory. Instead I would say that it gets directly to that point in the most primary, elementally important way. It's precisely what I would judge him on. And nothing much else, really.
He was not sent down because his defense is suspect.How'd he being deployed? If he's down there because his defense is suspect, they're going to give him defensive zone deployments. Judging based on points might not be the highest priority. I wouldn't discount it entirely, but if it's the primary concern, they certainly could set him up to get the most looks. I don't know if that's the case. If it is and he's not scoring, that's worrying.
It's a hypothetical, but he wasn't just sent down with a generic set of instructions to just score.He was not sent down because his defense is suspect.
Fifth OA. You expect him to produce period. I thought he was getting better and better this year but just did not produce. I would not have sent him down in the first place as he was playing better than some vets, yet there are only so many roster spots. Hayton has much work to do.Has any one been able to watch Roadrunners' games and see how he's even being deployed? My guess is he was told precisely what he needed to work on, and the Tucson coaching staff is accommodating that. To measure his performance down there by points scored is so cursory, but I suppose that's all you can tell from game logs. I'm sure there is more focus on getting him to make smarter and quicker decisions with the puck. He's a center so he's going to be expected to play a big role in defensive zone breakouts and offensive zone entries. I'd be delighted if he worked on that all season down in Tucson so he can come up next season and contribute in such a fashion. We desperately need offensive depth in those areas. I'm sure there is plenty of other stuff for him to work on that doesn't show up on the scoreboard.
"Not worried" is what you and many other posters are saying. I have been worried for awhile. I thought he was playing better before being sent down, but his play was nowhere near expectations. He is young and needs big TOI to develop which he has not getting with RT, but you have to earn your TOI. Hayton has only played 34 games in the NHL, and that there alone is a reason to be optimistic, I guess.First few games he'll probably be reliant on line mates and overall team play as he adjusts to new coach and new team mates. When he's comfortable in this new setting he should *hopefully* be able to create more offense on his own. Not worried.
He should be a PPG player in the AHL.
I'm starting to wonder if folks around here know how human beings work.
That’s the opposite of the point for this specific player. Nobody has been worried about anything but points with him. It’s like we forgot who we are talking about. This isn’t Dylan Strome.Do people know a player can actually get better without scoring points? It is possible people.
That’s the opposite of the point for this specific player. Nobody has been worried about anything but points with him.
I've been concerned about his lack of ice time and that's about all.That’s the opposite of the point for this specific player. Nobody has been worried about anything but points with him. It’s like we forgot who we are talking about. This isn’t Dylan Strome.
I disagree completely.I can guarantee you that the only people who care about Barrett Hayton turning into a points-producing machine right now in Tucson are in Forum 40. It seems pretty obvious that there was something in Hayton's game beyond strictly producing points that Armstrong didn't like and wanted him to work on by getting more icetime in the A than Tocchet was allowing him with the big club.
His offensive zone reaction time is piss poor. Slow reflexes. He's not close to being able to produce offensively in the NHL from what I've seen. If that's continuing in the AHL where the game is slower, we should all be shitting our pants. It will take way more that three games to determine if that's the case. Being pointless in three games is certainly more concerning than having a couple of points, which seems like an obviously self-evident notion but here we are.I've been concerned about his lack of ice time and that's about all.
There’s strategy to holding the puck, drawing the opponent to you. It opens up ice for your line mates. His reaction time is fine. He just needs more confidence.His offensive zone reaction time is piss poor. Slow reflexes. He's not close to being able to produce offensively in the NHL from what I've seen. If that's continuing in the AHL where the game is slower, we should all be shitting our pants. It will take way more that three games to determine if that's the case. Being pointless in three games is certainly more concerning than having a couple of points, which seems like an obviously self-evident notion but here we are.
No. That’s not what I’m talking about. He was slow as shit when the puck was near him or in pursuit. I’m not talking decision making. His decision making and positioning were great. His reaction time and reflexes were Bissonnette level. I’m talking eyes hands feet and stick.There’s strategy to holding the puck, drawing the opponent to you. It opens up ice for your line mates. His reaction time is fine. He just needs more confidence.