JeromeHP
Registered User
Well its basically major junior or ncaa. The ushl is a great league to get ready for college hockey but for pineault the Q was his only and best option when he decided to leave BC
right now i would pick stamkos over hayes, but i think doughty has a good chanse for the #1 overall aswell.
I love Hayes. Stamkos is super hyped but I think I'd take Hayes over him.
dont be surprised if hayes signs with moncton. theyll make him a great offer. hes not going back to prep school. he doesnt want to play for columbus either. so if hes going to play in he ushl they will have to trade him. the q is the most logical choice for him given his age, draft ranking and the fact that moncton has the ability to lure american prospects there.
So from that Ill assume that Hayes is american?
What do you mean they'll make him a great offer? this isnt pro what kind of offer are you expecting they are able to make?
So from that Ill assume that Hayes is american?
I've finally found someone (Jon) to take the heat off me as a so-called American homer!
I have heard a lot about Wahl, who can you compare him too???? Is he in the league as Stamkos and Hayes??
I have been hearing a lot about him lately, but from what I have been hearing is that Teubert is the best d-man prospect out there. They are even comparing him to Pronger..literally. Why do you feel Doughty is a better player?
I have been hearing a lot about him lately, but from what I have been hearing is that Teubert is the best d-man prospect out there. They are even comparing him to Pronger..literally. Why do you feel Doughty is a better player?
i gotta admitt i have never seen teubert play, but i have seen doughty a feaw times and he has left me impressed every time. he has amazing offensive ability and superb skating. he's poise with the puck is just world class. he is also very reliable (sp?) defensively. i just cant see any d-man in the 08 draft being better then him. IMO the #1 overall pick right now is a race between stamkos and doughty.
Tuebert is solid, he used to play on my buddies' midget AAA team. I played street hockey with him one time, he wasnt all that good. But every one knows that hockey on ice is alot different than hockey on blades.
I think Pietrangelo is closer to Pronger than Teubert is, though I could be biased towards the player i've seen much more of.AmericanDream said:Will see come draft day I guess, I just cant see someone passing up on Pronger jr. (Teubert) for any other d-man in the draft. IMO.
I think Pietrangelo is closer to Pronger than Teubert is, though I could be biased towards the player i've seen much more of.
I have a little writeup on the top 20 or so OHL prospects for the 2008 draft, similar to Jon Rx's list of top americans. I can post if if anybody is interested.
alright. just give me a little bit. gotta clean it up a bitRabid Ranger said:Please post the list, it would be greatly appreciated.
I think Pietrangelo is closer to Pronger than Teubert is, though I could be biased towards the player i've seen much more of.
I have a little writeup on the top 20 or so OHL prospects for the 2008 draft, similar to Jon Rx's list of top americans. I can post if if anybody is interested.
alright. just give me a little bit. gotta clean it up a bit
I'm not fully sold on Teubert - when WHL draft day rolled around, it came down to Mitch Wahl not wanting to play for a Canadian team, rumor has it he may very well have been picked ahead of Teubert. Don't know how true that is, only the Regina brass know for sure, but Teubert just doesn't open my eyes the way Jared Cowen has.
I've finally found someone (Jon) to take the heat off me as a so-called American homer!
Indeed you are correct...
Hayes -- American
Stamkos -- Canadian
On that note, I believe I'd personally take Stamkos right now... he's an incredible player. But I wouldn't entirely surprised to see Hayes pass him by next season.
Change the word "offer" to pitch. Either way, there is alot of selling going on to lure top-notch prospects. The same thing happened to get Kane to London, Mueller to Everett, etc.