CallMeShaft
Registered User
- Apr 14, 2014
- 16,411
- 23,056
7pts in 5 games since the coaching change.
Has Connor Bedard quietly became underrated ?
- Thread starter Brookbank
- Start date
- Jul 21, 2022
- 2,194
- 2,223
? I consider Celebrini to be a superior talent. Bedard is just getting a ton of Ice time and that is the only reason why he's getting pts but besides that the guy looks like he can't skate half of the time so he might be injured idk. He's still very green.
Celebrini is better and idk why you would think i thought otherwise with what you quoted me on
Apologies, no idea what happened there but my intention was to quote sensfan4lifee.
You know what pisses me off....that you're allowed to spew BS like this....and nothing happens/zero consequences. Whereas if i were to PROPERLY call you out rn for how absurd your take is....I'd probably be the one getting banned/punished. So ill just bite my tongue.
Nice to see unless you're one of the # of posters in this thread that CLEARLY have it out for him/are passive aggressively rooting against him at every turn and then playing dumb whenever questioned about it.
ORRFForever
Registered User
- Oct 29, 2018
- 20,048
- 11,205
But why do posters let those guys bother them? What those posters think matters NOT one bit. Just let them squawk.
- Jul 21, 2022
- 2,194
- 2,223
Weren’t you the guy a couple days ago who said the main difference between Donato and Bedard’s totals was usage? lol
“Better to stay quiet and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt”
Acallabeth
Post approved by Ovechkin
I stand by this. If he gets 60-70 points this season and next, he's going to be one of the best contracts in the NHL by the time he's 24.
- Jul 21, 2022
- 2,194
- 2,223
Ehhh,,,.....never said main difference. I said they had a similar Pts per 60 minute ratio and Bedard was ahead by 50% due to his usage being roughly 50% more.
CallMeShaft
Registered User
- Apr 14, 2014
- 16,411
- 23,056
We'll sign him this off-season for 9.8m per for 8 years. Just like how Pittsburgh signed Sid for 8.7m.
And it will be one of the better value contracts in the league.
PainForShane
formerly surfshop
- Dec 24, 2019
- 2,879
- 3,316
All-time post. Sincere thanks for letting us witness this particular discussion
- Jul 21, 2022
- 2,194
- 2,223
Are you saying that a peak Bedard should be close to a 60 min ratio vs plugs? Are you saying thats a normal thing?
PainForShane
formerly surfshop
- Dec 24, 2019
- 2,879
- 3,316
And I never said Eric Robinson and Auston Matthews were equivalent players, just that they had similar P/60 and Matthews was ahead by 68% due to his usage being 69% higher.
This is how bad your stats are, this is actually the exact equivalency you are making. You can double check the numbers if you don’t believe me.
You have to love it when someone is so confident in bad numbers they can compare Bedard and the Donato’s of the world and actually believe they are equivalent.
- Jul 21, 2022
- 2,194
- 2,223
You have an agenda here to gaslight everyone that your thinking is the one that is correct.
I was simply making a statement and you wrongly quoted me so i just wanted to clarify what i was saying.
I dont care if you don't agree with the stats but thats what they showed at the time. The question here is not if Donato is better than Bedard, the question is how come Bedard's numbers are so low. Donato is a plug, Bedard is a polished a talent. Why is a plug, helping my team at the same rate as my guy who's supposed to elevate my team's offense?
Not sure whats so complicated to understand here, its simple maths a 5 years old would understand.
Do you understand the concept of pts per 60 mins? Its a stat that gives you insight on how efficient a player is with the ice time you're giving him.
What is so hard to understand about this
ok so what you yapping about?
