Has Connor Bedard quietly became underrated ?

Luigi Lemieux

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
22,190
10,804
* carrying one of the most unsound rosters in the league down the middle. As a young 19 year old.


There was no 100 point players before the lockout and 8 the year after the lockout. Ovi and Crosby dined out on the new obstruction rules right after the lockout.
The scoring environment is the exact same this season as it was in 05-06, 6.16 gpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regal

PassingBy

Registered User
Nov 21, 2024
2
3
There was no 100 point players before the lockout and 8 the year after the lockout. Ovi and Crosby dined out on the new obstruction rules right after the lockout.

Unlike Bedard, who is now playing in a well known historic dead puck era?
However it doesn't matter as we are comparing Ovi's results to the results of other guys on his team, who were playing under the same rules.

As for Ovi being 20, not 19 - he arrived from another country, didn't speak the language, trained all his life and played before coming to NHL on bigger rinks and different rules. And still from the get go was head and shoulders above all his teammates.
 

Dicky113

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
4,536
3,523
When I saw him play last year I was shocked by how small he was. He looked like a child skating around with men.
He doesn’t have the size, speed or strength to be on the Crosby/McDavid/Ovechkin level. His upside is Patrick Kane; his downside is Matt Barzal
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

ClydeLee

Registered User
Mar 23, 2012
12,265
5,760
Seriously? That was a very common argument before his rookie year.
The common argument that seemed most real talent evaluators had is he is the best since McDavid, but by no means should you think he's on the level of McDavid/Crosby because he doesn't have the speed or size to be that level.

Yes people said otherwise... some here, not people I would say are good at evaluating the talent.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,389
34,102
The common argument that seemed most real talent evaluators had is he is the best since McDavid, but by no means should you think he's on the level of McDavid/Crosby because he doesn't have the speed or size to be that level.

Yes people said otherwise... some here, not people I would say are good at evaluating the talent.
No disagreement there.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,568
16,479
Vancouver
The common argument that seemed most real talent evaluators had is he is the best since McDavid, but by no means should you think he's on the level of McDavid/Crosby because he doesn't have the speed or size to be that level.

Yes people said otherwise... some here, not people I would say are good at evaluating the talent.

I think the effect of nationalism tends to be overblown but I also wonder if some media went overboard on the “generational” tag because there was a bit of a lull in Canadian talent since McDavid while USA hockey had been booming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,155
11,304
When I saw him play last year I was shocked by how small he was. He looked like a child skating around with men.
He doesn’t have the size, speed or strength to be on the Crosby/McDavid/Ovechkin level. His upside is Patrick Kane; his downside is Matt Barzal
He measured under 5'10 at the combine. I think officially at 5'9 and 3/4. He's well built for his size, but still, he's sub 5'10 unless he grew over the past year.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad