Has Connor Bedard quietly became underrated ?

Brookbank

Registered User
Nov 15, 2022
2,321
2,158
For Canadians

• Peter Forsberg, Sweden 42

• Robert Reichel, Czechoslovakia 40

• Pavel Bure, USSR 39

Were all better.



Again for Canadians

Peter ForsbergSweden199372431
Markus NaslundSweden1993131124
Raimo HelminenFinland1984111324

Were all better.

Those guys all had great careers, just not generational. I think that Bedard will be an elite player but I don't see him as a generational talent.



It also isn't always guaranteed. He will get better, but I don't see the jump to generational that others see.
Bedard was playing on pace to beat Forsbergs record. But things tightened up in later rounds.

Peter Forsberg put up an unthinkable 31 points in seven games at the 1993 World Junior Championships. That’s an average of 4.43 points per game. Bedard was averaging 4.50 points per game. The Swedish defense was actually aware of the record and were playing to save it.

The Swedish defence was aimed squarely at preventing Bedard from adding to his tournament-leading six goals and they managed to do that. But Bedard simply pivoted to setting up his teammates, tallying four assists in a dominant 5-1 win.

I noticed you had nothing to say about the Jagr record
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Luigi Lemieux

Crow

Registered User
May 19, 2014
4,535
3,388
Huh?

McDavid was third in ppg as a rookie and then led the league in scoring the next year.

They were more NHL ready because they were bigger guys, not necessarily because they were further ahead in physical maturity. I'm not fully convinced Crosby was any further ahead in his physical development at 18/19 than Bedard.

Crosby was 5'11 193
Bedard is 5'10 185

That's pretty much the same density. I'm not sure how much bigger you expect Bedard to get. Maybe he gets to 190 without losing any speed?

I expect to see improvements from him over the next 5 years, but I question how much those improvements will be a result of him reaching a new level of physical maturity.
Weight and strength are far different things. He could remain the same weight and gain massive amounts of strength. I’ve seen 170 lb guys squat their weight in their late teens and twice that later, as they matured and trained without gaining weight.

Adding mass might help anyway, or it might slow him down. Hard to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PainForShane

Dicky113

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
4,527
3,483
I think he’s quietly become a decent 1st overall but nowhere near the next McDavid or even Crosby. He’s too small to be on that level.
 

KirkAlbuquerque

#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
Mar 12, 2014
36,383
43,429
New York

PainForShane

formerly surfshop
Dec 24, 2019
2,854
3,290
Weight and strength are far different things. He could remain the same weight and gain massive amounts of strength. I’ve seen 170 lb guys squat their weight in their late teens and twice that later, as they matured and trained without gaining weight.

Adding mass might help anyway, or it might slow him down. Hard to say.

Yep. Also it matters where the weight / strength is actually located.

I'm an intermediate lifter living in Arizona. A few years ago, randomly bumped into Lawson Crouse who asked for a spot while I was lifting at an LA Fitness during some random offseason, he was doing 115 on the bench for reps (?!?!?) which is severely unimpressive for anyone who's spent any time doing strength training, let alone an actual athlete. To be clear, he may have been deloading, he may have been finishing out his chest after already crunching it in other exercises, I legitimately have no idea. But the weight he was moving with his upper body was not impressive at all, esp not for one of the better power forwards in the league (which he was at the time).

But like... he's a hockey player, same as Bedard. Pretty sure both of their squats and / or leg press would've crushed whatever it is most of us mortals do on the weekend. A quick check of someone like Tarasenko shows 6'0 , 209 pounds which is not that abnormal... but his teammates called him Tank because of how the guy was built.

***

If Bedard ends up putting on lower body and / or core strength -- which I'm fairly certain he'll decide to do during one of these offseasons over the next few years -- game on. As a neutral, I'll be excited to see what he can bring once he's able to consistently shoot from high danger areas. We'll see if he gets there but either way the kid's 19 years old rn, far too early to write him off. Everyone knows alcohol kills gainz, the guy can't even legally drink yet. Primed for growth
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,674
50,087
.....IF he produces at the level of Kane and Matthews.

It really comes down to this....If he's "generational", then he will need to be the undisputed top 1 or 2 player in the NHL. If he doesn't outproduce McDavid, he needs to be right there within striking distance and obviously will require multiple Ross, Hart, Rocket or Lindsey awards (not all, but multiple of a few of them).

If we are still here in a year or two arguing if he's generational, then he ain't.
Yzerman, Lafleur, Mackinnon… it took them a little while to get going. I wouldn’t worry about this at all.

Bedard’s on a horrible team. No support at all. Of course he’s going to struggle.
 

Acallabeth

Post approved by Ovechkin
Jul 30, 2011
10,118
1,634
Moscow
Bedard was playing on pace to beat Forsbergs record. But things tightened up in later rounds.
It was not 'pace', he just padded his stats against the worst team in the tournament that wouldn't even be allowed to play if the WJC was best-on-best. It's not the NHL when you can count pace expecting more or less comparable competition all season.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad