Yes, I would caution people to pump the brakes a bit on Barron, Ronning, Reunanen, etc. Barron has looked good but I think his numbers are a bit inflated and he's not dominant on a shift-by-shift basis. This is a bit of a weird year in the AHL with a lot more young guys than normal, and then random games like today where a team loses several important players to a call-up all at once. It's hard to read too much into this season. Barron is having a really nice rookie season and it's encouraging sign for the future. I see talk on other threads of how he needs to be up in the NHL right now--he doesn't. He's fine, he's at an appropriate level and he's still learning how to play the professional game. He's not a guy who is too good for the level he's at.
The same can absolutely be said for Reunanen. He's a good bet to make some plays every single game, and you can tell he's more experienced than a lot of the guys he's playing with and against. But he makes his fair share of mistakes that are "d'oh!" moments for the AHL level. I don't think he's ready for prime time in the NHL. He looks like a third pair, 2nd PP guy, which is good--but I don't think it's something we will have much use for. I feel like he's either moved and makes it elsewhere or goes back. Not because he's not good enough to play in the NHL, but he's not so good as to force his way into a loaded defensive lineup/prospect pool like we have. Someone like Lindgren, I said he would--and he did; some guys bring unique things that make them stick. I don't know that Reunanen is unique or good enough at what he does to stick. Anyway, that's just my opinion on his future. His present, he's pretty good. Again, not great, but pretty good.
Ronning is exciting because his overall game has just improved by leaps and bounds. He's a totally different, much more confident player. At the same time, he's still small, and while he's generally strong on the puck as he's good at protecting it, he still gets knocked around. He's generating a ton of offense both for himself and others, but he's basically a goal per game while averaging less than 2.5 shots per game--shooting well over 33%. I'm not sure what his role would be in the NHL--maybe someone like Colin Blackwell, but even then I still think he needs to get stronger and get more pucks to the cage. It will be tough for him because it's unlikely he'd be called up and immediately see good TOI or PP time, and so he'd need to find out how to be effective in limited minutes in a limited role.
I remember Artem Anisimov in his second year in the AHL. He was 20, I think. He played the whole year and was basically 40-40. He was the best-looking homegrown forward we've had in Hartford for a long time. That season he was great. Game-in, game-out, he was one of the best guys out there. And he played a full AHL schedule and when he came into the NHL the following year, he was a good rookie but was still like a third line player. I think he was substantially ahead of a Barron or Reunanen (I know, different positions). Numbers can be a bit deceiving. Tim Gettinger is a big bag of mediocre and he has a couple good games in a row and now his numbers would tell you we've got a 6'6" point per game player in the AHL, great right? But that's misleading. I would just preach patience and encourage people to temper their expectations for what these guys are capable of doing at this moment.