Player Discussion Hampus Lindholm - II

bp14

Registered User
Mar 17, 2022
324
816
Wow. What the hell happened to this guy? He’s just not even close to the player who finished last regular season here. His contract is starting to look like a total anchor.

He reminds of Kaberle in a Bruins uni. Yes, that bad.
 

gerrycheeversmask

Registered User
Feb 18, 2021
352
716
Behind Enemy Lines
Lindholm looks like he was born to be a Vancouver Canuck.

Never give "B level" players "A level" term going into their mid-to-late 30s.

Meanwhile, this Bruins franchise will likely attempt to double-down on that notion this summer chasing Elias Lindholm.
Exactly. Elias Lindolm seems like a centerman version of Loui Eriksson. Let's see what he can do in the second round if Vancouver gets by Nashville.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

Mad-Marcus

Registered User
Apr 26, 2002
908
981
Seacoast, NH
Order of effectiveness
1. MacAvoy
2.Carlo(and I'm not ahis biggest fanboy)
3.Peeke(his injury effected the entire d corp lineup)
4.Wotherspoon/Lorhie - tied for different reasons good PK D vs good O skills, both seemingly willing to hit and be hit. How Lohrie got up from last nights cheap shot, wow, tougher than he looks.
5.Lindholm the 8M/year albatross, "don't hit, don't score, what do ya do?" wasn't that an Adam Ant song back in the 80's
6.Gryz ugh, too small, now too slow
 
Last edited:

goldenblack

Registered User
Apr 15, 2024
561
1,454
Order of effectiveness
1. MacAvoy
2.Carlo(and I'm not ahis biggest fanboy)
3.Peeke(his injury effected the entire d corp lineup)
4.Wotherspoon/Lorhie - tied for different reasons good PK D vs good O skills, both seemingly willing to hot and be hot. How Lohrie got up from last nights cheap shot, wow, tougher than he looks.
5.Lindholm the 8M/year albatross, "don't hit, don't score, what do ya do?" wasn't that an Adam Ant song back in the 80's
6.Gryz ugh, too small, now too slow

6.5M?

Still needs to be better
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad-Marcus

Gonzothe7thDman

Registered User
Jun 24, 2007
15,455
15,291
Central, Ma
I was very vocal about wanting Chychrun over Lindholm given age and when I thought the Bruins would actually be in another cup window. Didn't love the Lindholm move when it was made.

First half of last season Lindholm played at a level that made me think I could possibly be wrong for the first time in forever.

But if you look at his entire body of work as a Bruin so far hes much closer to the bad anaheim level Lindholm than he is that first half of last season level.

Chychrun is by no means physical and wouldn't solve our "soft" issue, but he would have brought a different dimension offensively than what Lindholm currently does.

Still think I would have paid that price for Chychrun over Lindholm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad-Marcus

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,642
22,455
My #1 pet peeve about Lindholm is how he shoots so politely at the net. Like he's afraid to hurt the opposing goalie. Put some mustard on that shot!!!

That pretty much describes the entire D. When is the last time a Bruin D-man tried to hammer a one-timer from the point?

No wonder Leaf defenders have no fear of staying in the lane and block the shot. Muffins from the point they'll eat that all day.
 

PB37

Mr Selke
Oct 1, 2002
25,566
20,052
Maine
He's had the yips with the puck almost all year. I don't have issues with him positional and usually find him pretty good along the boards. But for whatever reason, once the puck gets near his stick, it takes him a couple of attempts before making contact with the damn thing. It's so strange.
 

chizzler

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 11, 2006
13,444
6,574
He's had the yips with the puck almost all year. I don't have issues with him positional and usually find him pretty good along the boards. But for whatever reason, once the puck gets near his stick, it takes him a couple of attempts before making contact with the damn thing. It's so strange.
He needs to skate with the puck. It’s the difference in his game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Number4orr

NDiesel

Registered User
Mar 22, 2008
9,432
10,083
NWO
He needs to skate with the puck. It’s the difference in his game.
I think this is the real issue. He's lot some speed and I think it's making him rush his decisions more. He was really calm with it when he first got here.
 

Kalus

Registered User
Sep 27, 2003
1,946
1,265
Florida
Never give "B level" players "A level" term going into their mid-to-late 30s.

Meanwhile, this Bruins franchise will likely attempt to double-down on that notion this summer chasing Elias Lindholm.
This is it. Most on here were emphatically praising the deal when it was signed. It is like people conveniently forget how aging curves and regression work or they don’t understand it. How have they not learned by now? The guy will be 36 the last year of this deal. Regression usually starts around age 30, give or take a year depending on the player. 30 in Hampus’ case.

You accept that downside risk for top players, not players like Hampus
 

chizzler

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 11, 2006
13,444
6,574
I think they can fix him. He started doing this when the injury came. If they get back to skating out the puck instead of the cycling or the half pass in the zone, they’d be ok. They alway revert back to cycling. The old Clode style that would get them pounded year after year. Carlo is an example. He still does that type of play that gets him crushed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad