I'm divided in my opinions. On the one hand I like:
*Just about everything Keefe has done. The 5 Swedes for Salming, Simmonds v Flyers, praise when deserved, introducing Marlies, Timmins, Holmberg, in a fashion that offers opportunity without asking too much. At the same time critical of poor efforts when required. Attempting to make this team more accountable for its efforts, or lack of. Getting them to buy into team D.
*Goaltending has been a pleasant surprise, better than I expected, especially given the injuries. I might offer Woll a chance for a game in the near future, just to acclimate him to the show, and I'd explain why to both Sam and Murray.
*Defense has been surprisingly good. And we have depth. I could ask for more, but there's time.
*Management continues to cobble together a contending team, attempts to move on from mistakes, and offers the players perhaps the most helpful support structures in the game.
*Forwards buying into responsibility on D. Very good production from our top 4, with not a one, imo, being at their best for an extended period. I think each of them has more to offer. A bottom six that is adequate, but needs improvements.
On the other hand:
*A third line that can score and be tough to play against. They can hem a team in, and move the puck out of their zone well, but they don't offer the support for scoring that I'd like to see. An upgrade at 3C would be my first concern, then a scoring winger who is tough to play against. Neither has to be a homerun acquisition, but upgrades would make this team more dangerous. Kamph and Engvall/Holmberg and ZAR would be excellent low event players on the 4th line.
*My biggest concern...to my eyes this team lacks 'something' in the hunger department. There's a great deal of talent on this team, but I don't see this team as yet having that cruel determination that the best teams have. Using Matthews as the example (please no drama, he's a great player, I get it), but those moments when he should have 'made a statement' - against Montreal a few years back, and against, damn I forget, but he allowed his team to stand up for him and then provoked/poked the bear one more time - ya can't do that. JT too, damn the crap he takes without some type of response, Engvall...jeezus H Christmas dude, drop somebody. Rielly's stood up for team mates in the past, do it for yourself! Lily, you're a beast, throw someone to the ice in anger. Winning with skill is fun to watch, but there's a time when a 'f*ck you' attitude gains you a step, a hesitation, some fear from the other side. That time is called the playoffs, and I'm not sure we have that anger/determination with the group we have.
*Just about everything Keefe has done. The 5 Swedes for Salming, Simmonds v Flyers, praise when deserved, introducing Marlies, Timmins, Holmberg, in a fashion that offers opportunity without asking too much. At the same time critical of poor efforts when required. Attempting to make this team more accountable for its efforts, or lack of. Getting them to buy into team D.
*Goaltending has been a pleasant surprise, better than I expected, especially given the injuries. I might offer Woll a chance for a game in the near future, just to acclimate him to the show, and I'd explain why to both Sam and Murray.
*Defense has been surprisingly good. And we have depth. I could ask for more, but there's time.
*Management continues to cobble together a contending team, attempts to move on from mistakes, and offers the players perhaps the most helpful support structures in the game.
*Forwards buying into responsibility on D. Very good production from our top 4, with not a one, imo, being at their best for an extended period. I think each of them has more to offer. A bottom six that is adequate, but needs improvements.
On the other hand:
*A third line that can score and be tough to play against. They can hem a team in, and move the puck out of their zone well, but they don't offer the support for scoring that I'd like to see. An upgrade at 3C would be my first concern, then a scoring winger who is tough to play against. Neither has to be a homerun acquisition, but upgrades would make this team more dangerous. Kamph and Engvall/Holmberg and ZAR would be excellent low event players on the 4th line.
*My biggest concern...to my eyes this team lacks 'something' in the hunger department. There's a great deal of talent on this team, but I don't see this team as yet having that cruel determination that the best teams have. Using Matthews as the example (please no drama, he's a great player, I get it), but those moments when he should have 'made a statement' - against Montreal a few years back, and against, damn I forget, but he allowed his team to stand up for him and then provoked/poked the bear one more time - ya can't do that. JT too, damn the crap he takes without some type of response, Engvall...jeezus H Christmas dude, drop somebody. Rielly's stood up for team mates in the past, do it for yourself! Lily, you're a beast, throw someone to the ice in anger. Winning with skill is fun to watch, but there's a time when a 'f*ck you' attitude gains you a step, a hesitation, some fear from the other side. That time is called the playoffs, and I'm not sure we have that anger/determination with the group we have.