This board is so funny the longer you're around. I've seen the same arguments used for and against players at this point and it makes me laugh.
On the one hand, Makar has been singled out by Canucks or Rangers fans for not being on the PK. For not scoring more than their forwards. For being injured and not scoring as much. Even when it's only say... 10 games.
Then you get to see the same arguments used the opposite way. Why should Hughes PK when it's less valuable why. Why do the injuries matter when pace is there. He's the leasing scorer, he's so great!
Here's what matters to voters...
Games Played
Total Points (Goals > Assists)
Defensive impact
Reputation
Playoff team
If Hughes remains injured, pace is irrelevant if Makar doesn't and scores more.
If Makar keeps up the goals, those are worth more than Assists.
If Makar keeps being a stud defensively, it's irrelevant what Hughes metrics or his hype train says. Makar is still a top defender in his own zone.
Makar has the reputation, more than Hughes in fact.
His team is a playoff team. And he was out scoring the current league leading player a dozen games into the season. Buts it's not his fault Canucks don't HAVE a MacKinnon or Rantanen.
Simple enough... So yeah, Makar easily right now. Could be Hughes easily if Makar had been the one injured instead.