Post-Game Talk: Habs remain winless in November

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,808
12,619
Better effort by the team in a general sense, but every f***ing game, we look awfully bad in our own zone. I wonder how frustrating that must be for the players, and whether they are all buying into the system St. Louis is trying to implement.

On another, more incredulous note, I'm surprised by the present vibe of this fanbase and forum. Many fans on here, some even pro-tank, are criticizing the Habs brass harshly & vocally, and have set some unrealistic expectations for this team.
No man's land was best-case scenario for this squad at the start of pre-season. Well, tough luck, the consensus of this fanbase was wrong, and as usual, overrated its team and staff.
We're in the midst of a rebuild, it'll hurt and suck for us. Growing pains for the young and inexperienced players.
Well said. The frustration is predictable as are many fans’ tendency to overrate their team’s strengths and chances.

As I have noted, last year, three elements: an elite top line, above average goaltending and a highly mobile defence allowed the team to be competitive. Remove one of those pillars of strength in any game and the team usually lost.

This year (at least to date) the top line has largely been absent; the goaltending spotty and the defence, whether by subtraction or injury, has been far less mobile and thus, far more ineffective.

Its not surprising therefore, at least to this writer, that on many nights the team is not competitive and, consequently, sits last in the Eastern Conference.
 
Last edited:

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,827
23,505
Nova Scotia
Visit site
Better effort by the team in a general sense, but every f***ing game, we look awfully bad in our own zone. I wonder how frustrating that must be for the players, and whether they are all buying into the system St. Louis is trying to implement.

On another, more incredulous note, I'm surprised by the present vibe of this fanbase and forum. Many fans on here, some even pro-tank, are criticizing the Habs brass harshly & vocally, and have set some unrealistic expectations for this team.
No man's land was best-case scenario for this squad at the start of pre-season. Well, tough luck, the consensus of this fanbase was wrong, and as usual, overrated its team and staff.
We're in the midst of a rebuild, it'll hurt and suck for us. Growing pains for the young and inexperienced players.
The golf tournament day, the vibe was in the mix, and playing meaningful games in March/April.....setting up expectations that may not have been the best for everyone.

The impatience is not just with this group, but the fact that we have been a terrible team since 2017
The new group have done some things to make strides, and some things that have gone sideways.

Development, as many have stated isn't always linear. My hope for the team to recover soon, and play 500 hockey is fading, but after 14 games, it's still early and HuGo I think will make some changes around the 20 game mark.

I was never expecting the playoffs, this year, but was expecting better than their current state of play, especially in their own end. We really miss Luke Richardson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

ahmedou

DOU
Oct 7, 2017
19,625
19,412
New Avatar

New Meme

Vintage Facepalm
Screenshot_20241108_081241_X.jpg
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,197
16,928
Montreal
I'm okay if they lose games like they did last night. They were super competitive and didn't look outmatched. They were right there with NJ all night.

The game came down to the fact that they simply could not contain Hughes. While it's a team deficiency, it's also an indication that the club lacks a top pairing D man. In the Subban, Markov, Weber era, they would have gone head-to-head with Hughes all night.

I love Guhle, but he's not yet ready to handle that skill level.

One thing I do not love is the lack of intensity on the forecheck. The only players working hard on the forecheck are Gallagher, Evans, Newhook, Anderson, Heineman. Everyone else is so passive and barely pressure the D with speed.
 

Kosseca

Registered User
Feb 23, 2020
1,309
1,164
I wonder if Newhook will have more games like tonight or did he reach his quota of good games. In fairness he was dynamite tonight. Habs tend to have random players wake up at random periods of time but never as a whole team.
In all fairness, NJ is not a physical team and MTL had space to play. I'm hoping this will inject confidence, but I remain skeptical for now. That said, if he can bring this level of play on a consistant basis... well that is gona be fun to watch
 

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,798
2,496
I wonder how much better Matheson might be if his minutes were more closely managed. He’s too erratic and mistake-prone at his current workload.

He was always erratic and mistake-prone with his former teams, dont think using him on the second our third pairing would change that
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,197
16,928
Montreal
In all fairness, NJ is not a physical team and MTL had space to play. I'm hoping this will inject confidence, but I remain skeptical for now. That said, if he can bring this level of play on a consistant basis... well that is gona be fun to watch
I have no problems with Newhook. He's your typical top 6 forward who will have stretches of productivity and stretches where he has blanks. He is not going to carry a line, but every team needs guys like this.

The difference between top 6 players like Newhook and Drouin is that Newhook brings his lunch pale every game and works his tail off. Guys like Drouin coast and really just depend on their talent.
 

JustAHabFan

Registered User
Apr 8, 2008
7,818
2,878
Habs didn't seem to breakdown as much as they normally do defensively, but still did more than you'd hope and it ended in the net quite often


Team is improving slightly, but I was gone to bed like 5 minutes into the 3rd, so they may have really sucked for the last 15 minutes
For me the goal by Hughes was just horrible. You let him go the front of the net that easy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Lurk

Adam Michaels

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
78,767
129,166
Montreal
Lost us games means we were winning the game, when were we winning the game yesterday?

I know what @Kennerback is trying to say. For example last night, Habs had the extra attacker and they had possession of the puck in the offensive zone. And instead of creating plays that lead to scoring chances to tie the game, he fumbles the puck at the blue line that leads Jersey to score in the open net.

And it's not the first time that Matheson is victim of such a play.
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
54,909
70,353
I know what @Kennerback is trying to say. For example last night, Habs had the extra attacker and they had possession of the puck in the offensive zone. And instead of creating plays that lead to scoring chances to tie the game, he fumbles the puck at the blue line that leads Jersey to score in the open net.

And it's not the first time that Matheson is victim of such a play.
I understand as well, but that’s not costing us the game. If the game was tied then it would be costing us the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Lurk

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad