Bijelo
Registered User
Last time the Habs had a productive Swede was Mats Naslund.
A lot Swede talents in and outside NHL.
Last time the Habs had a productive Swede was Mats Naslund.
Such as ?I would offer more than the Wpg 1st to get Kakko.
1st + 3rd + Farrell/Tuch.Such as ?
No ? Rs have sometimes ignored/defied my advice, and track record = usually they should have listened to me.So when Bern says no, its pretty much automatic that he will be traded this offseason!
noKakko for the Jets first would make plenty of sense. Montreal needs winger depth, RW in particular, and NYR can't be developping a guy forever while they're in win-now mode.
Plus, he's from the 2019 draft class, and I think the secret objective is to get that entire draft class in Montreal. Yes, I'm kidding.
They did it with the Dach and Newhook trades. The Habs have multiple 1st round picks in 2024 and 2025. I can see them looking for another similar type of player to speed up the rebuild. The Wpg 1st + 2nd/3rd are in play as well as young dmen (Struble / Harris / Barron).Other than pure boredom amongst the fanbase why would the Habs think they’re in a position that they should be “speeding up the rebuild”? That’s a thing to do when you’re like one top six forward away from a rebuild being over and have an excess in prospects. Neither of which apply to Montreal.
What makes you think they aren’t? Slaf, Suzuki, Caufield and Dach are all top 6 forwards already.Other than pure boredom amongst the fanbase why would the Habs think they’re in a position that they should be “speeding up the rebuild”? That’s a thing to do when you’re like one top six forward away from a rebuild being over and have an excess in prospects. Neither of which apply to Montreal.
They're 26th in Goals Scored...What makes you think they aren’t? Slaf, Suzuki, Caufield and Dach are all top 6 forwards already.
Prospects are decent, but I wouldn't say they're so overflowing that they're running out of spots to put guys by the time waiver-exempt years are complete (which is what I mean by "overflow")Roy and Newhook both have a chance. They’re going to draft top 5-7 and most likely will pick a forward that’ll end up being a top 6. They have excess of high picks (4x first & 3x 2nd) over the next two years to acquire another one if needed.
They're 26th in Goals Against... none of those guys are anywhere close to running out of waiver-exempt..They have more NHL ready D than they need and at least 3 high end talent either in the NHL or coming up (Guhle, Reinbacher & Hutson).
Even if too good to properly tank, why rush things and look to acquire some RFA player that will be UFA in a couple years? What's the rush? They're not winning the Cup in a couple years anyways? There will always be future trades to make if they need to.. I don't see the value in rushing things just to do so.I see no reason why Montreal wouldn’t at least be in the playoff picture next year. One thing is sure, they will be too good to properly tank.
Because it's precisely the failed strategy that they've implemented for the last two years, trading draft picks for players further in their development - Newhook and Dach - whom they hoped would grow alongside Caufield and Suzuki, woefully inadequate core pieces for a rebuilding team?Other than pure boredom amongst the fanbase why would the Habs think they’re in a position that they should be “speeding up the rebuild”? That’s a thing to do when you’re like one top six forward away from a rebuild being over and have an excess in prospects. Neither of which apply to Montreal.
They traded for Dach, signed him to a 3 year deal and he's still a RFA at the end of it.They're 26th in Goals Scored...
Prospects are decent, but I wouldn't say they're so overflowing that they're running out of spots to put guys by the time waiver-exempt years are complete (which is what I mean by "overflow")
They're 26th in Goals Against... none of those guys are anywhere close to running out of waiver-exempt..
Even if too good to properly tank, why rush things and look to acquire some RFA player that will be UFA in a couple years? What's the rush? They're not winning the Cup in a couple years anyways? There will always be future trades to make if they need to.. I don't see the value in rushing things just to do so.
Think OP was talking about 25 year oldsThey traded for Dach, signed him to a 3 year deal and he's still a RFA at the end of it.
They traded for Newhook, signed him to a 4 year deal and he's still a RFA at the end of it.
The players the Habs are targeting will be cost-controlled and have potential for longterm service.
If they trade for a 30 year old... then i agree with ya.
Yeah, that doesn't fit the rebuild strategy.Think OP was talking about 25 year olds
Habs fans are probably seeing tonight what we mean by laff is just a different level player than slaf.
Slaf is good but hes no laff
Most of their scoring is coming from the sane 4 guys; Newhook, Suzuki, Caufield and Slaf. Dach next year will help a lot. Ideally Roy can step up a bit more although he’s still 20.They're 26th in Goals Scored...
Horrible bottom 6 F & a young D. Most of those guys will come back stronger next year with more experience. That should help… a lot.They're 26th in Goals Against... none of those guys are anywhere close to running out of waiver-exempt..
They don’t need to be cup favorite to acquire more talent. A 24-27 years old top 6 F will be in its prime when Montreal is ready to compete. They need to stay away from 28+ but I see no reason not to at least look into forwards entering their prime.Even if too good to properly tank, why rush things and look to acquire some RFA player that will be UFA in a couple years? What's the rush? They're not winning the Cup in a couple years anyways? There will always be future trades to make if they need to.. I don't see the value in rushing things just to do so.
We’ll compare apples to apples and 5v5 production. We’ll seeYeah, that doesn't fit the rebuild strategy.
In 2 x years, when Slaf is Laf's age, he will blow Laf's point total out of the water. Slaf will be a best in 2 x years.
If you want to compare apples to apples then compare their 19 years old seasons?We’ll compare apples to apples and 5v5 production. We’ll see
Sure. Laffs D+2 was better haha. You might wanna look into their stats.If you want to compare apples to apples then compare their 19 years old seasons?
Slaf with 50% more point production... and counting. LOLSure. Laffs D+2 was better haha. You might wanna look into their stats.
Not only was laffs better, he was also playing 3rd line minutes and like 5 mins less per night than slaf is playing now.
You might wanna check out the stats pal haha. Slaf’s playing more minutes because hes not on a team going to the eastern conference finals like laff was in D+2.Slaf with 50% more point production... and counting. LOL
Slaf plays more minutes because he's a far superior player than Laf (back when he was in D+2). Laf was a potential bust back then. Still not a 1OA quality player.
But let's see Slaf in his D+4 - in 2 x years. 6'3, 240lbs and getting bigger and stronger by the day. Oh my....
Works for me, those extra assets aren't of great value. I suspect Pittsburgh's 2nd next year would of more interest, though.1st + 3rd + Farrell/Tuch.
Rangers have 5 core players 30 or older1. Isn't Tuch going to be a Free agent this summer after spending 4 years in college?
2. Farrel at 5'9 doesn't really suit the Rangers style.
3. A late 1st and a 2nd/3rd doesn't really help the Rangers with their Stanley cup window.
The Rangers top forwards are all in their 30's now the only way the Rangers are trading him is if he's part of a bigger package OR A rebuilding team that has a good older-ish player that doesn't fit their timeline is offered to the Rangers and the rebuilding team thinks they can get more out of Kakko.
If Kekalainen was still the Jackets GM I could see him trading BOONE Jenner for Kakko.