Post-Game Talk: Habs lost twice in 24hrs, latest vs the Broons

MarkovsKnee

Global Moderator
Nov 21, 2007
55,553
70,780
Toronto
I had a bunch of Kirby images ready to use this season but they are all useless now since he's no good.

So sad .....

1000001734.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: the and Runner77

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,551
157,160
this franchise is scared shitless of goal scorers and offense
We could go on, although I’m not sure I’d call it that — more about priorities and certain choices being made and their early fallouts, plus inherited baggage.

Head coach who doesn’t want experienced coaching staff around him, smallish team not physically dominant, needing more first line talent. GM has tried some young, reclamation projects — question for me is how long will he wait if he needs to cut bait.

They need to get their next moves right, esp. after this season when a whole lot of cap room is kicking in. There is still time to address several concerns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,302
12,676
Why? The team is rebuilding and the worst players on it are guys brought in by previous management.

Honestly, Dvorak, Armia, etc will be gone soon. The team will have more space to bring someone in
Newhook, Barron, Matheson, and Dach are pretty bad themselves.

The question is if Hughes got most of his roster acquisitions wrong and, if you take into account his inability to sell Savard, Anderson, and others, got maybe 50% of his sales right… are we in the right hands?
 

The Real Timo

Registered User
Jun 18, 2019
17,241
21,286
Newhook, Barron, Matheson, and Dach are pretty bad themselves.

The question is if Hughes got most of his roster acquisitions wrong and, if you take into account his inability to sell Savard, Anderson, and others, got maybe 50% of his sales right… are we in the right hands?
It's getting more and more clear that we are not. It's not unrealistic to expect same results from Hughes as from MSL. Both have zero experience in their jobs at this level. Negotiating contracts is not the same as evaluating talent or building a roster.

There needs to be more heat on Hughes and he needs to start making moves to improve team THIS season. Having Suzuki, Caufield, Hutson, Slaf and Guhle on the team that is defeated before they even start a game cannot possibly be good for their development.

Get a f***ing, goalie, Hughes! Start with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomee

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,302
12,676
It's getting more and more clear that we are not. It's not unrealistic to expect same results from Hughes as from MSL. Both have zero experience in their jobs at this level. Negotiating contracts is not the same as evaluating talent or building a roster.

There needs to be more heat on Hughes and he needs to start making moves to improve team THIS season. Having Suzuki, Caufield, Hutson, Slaf and Guhle on the team that is defeated before they even start a game cannot possibly be good for their development.

Get a f***ing, goalie, Hughes! Start with that.
I dunno — it would run contrary to their “lose, for the greater good” mandate. As long as the fans and media are not tilted against them I don’t think they’ll feel any pressure. Does Hughes even want to win? Has he made any indication that he’s ever even tried to put together a winning team?

It’s all been firesales, gambles, and cap dumps. He went out of his way to acquire his former client Newhook. How do we know he’s even capable of improving a roster?
 

admiralcadillac

Registered User
Oct 22, 2017
7,706
7,033
Newhook, Barron, Matheson, and Dach are pretty bad themselves.

The question is if Hughes got most of his roster acquisitions wrong and, if you take into account his inability to sell Savard, Anderson, and others, got maybe 50% of his sales right… are we in the right hands?
Matheson is prone to bad decisions, but I don’t think he’s a bad player. He was one of the top minute munchers last year and simply plays too much in too big a role.

Dach is returning from injury. He will figure it out.

Barron is not good, and Newhook is a mystery given his last two years he was playing at a serviceable 2nd/third line level.

I am not sure if you’re in the playstation school of getting rid of anyone older than 24, but you have to keep veterans around and I’d much rather have Anderson and Savard than a 3rd round pick. What do you honestly think he would get for them?
 

The Real Timo

Registered User
Jun 18, 2019
17,241
21,286
We could go on, although I’m not sure I’d call it that — more about priorities and certain choices being made and their early fallouts, plus inherited baggage.

Head coach who doesn’t want experienced coaching staff around him, smallish team not physically dominant, needing more first line talent. GM has tried some young, reclamation projects — question for me is how long will he wait if he needs to cut bait.

They need to get their next moves right, esp. after this season when a whole lot of cap room is kicking in. There is still time to address several concerns.
Hughes, in my opinion, hasn't done much better than Bergevin. His best players - Suz, CC, Arbs (yes, better player than oh, I don't know... Matheson?), Guhle are Bergevin's picks/trades. Hutson was a great Hughes pick and Slaf... well... still to be seen. I don't he'll ever be great, but hope can turn decent. Maybe. Then, Hughes gave us Dach, Newhook, Barron, Matheson (FFS)... for the second straight year he f***ed up the goaltending situation. I am sorry... I don't see a huge difference. Some good, some bad... team still sucks and will continue to for a foreseeable future.
 

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,302
12,676
Matheson is prone to bad decisions, but I don’t think he’s a bad player. He was one of the top minute munchers last year and simply plays too much in too big a role.

Dach is returning from injury. He will figure it out.

Barron is not good, and Newhook is a mystery given his last two years he was playing at a serviceable 2nd/third line level.
Point is they’re not better than last year, their aggregate performance is flat at best (Matheson, Barron) or significantly worse (Dach, Newhook) in comparison.

These are his acquisition targets and they’ve either peaked already or are unable to peak when we need them to. Bad judgement to acquire players like this.
I am not sure if you’re in the playstation school of getting rid of anyone older than 24, but you have to keep veterans around and I’d much rather have Anderson and Savard than a 3rd round pick. What do you honestly think he would get for them?
I’m definitely not in that category and the point is he’s had more than enough time to churn through the roster if he wanted. He decided to retain Anderson when his value was high. He didn’t sell Savard and now Savard’s looks cooked.

On one hand we have all this talk about assets and the cold arithmetic of tanking and losing… on the other hand we see excuses made for a majority of Hughes moves (including the 5OA 2023) that have proven to be worth reevaluating.

Maybe Hughes looks passable after a sober reevaluation but the blind faith is inappropriate.
 

Habssince89

trolls to the IL
Sponsor
Apr 14, 2009
9,370
4,983
Vancouver, BC
Hughes, in my opinion, hasn't done much better than Bergevin. His best players - Suz, CC, Arbs (yes, better player than oh, I don't know... Matheson?), Guhle are Bergevin's picks/trades. Hutson was a great Hughes pick and Slaf... well... still to be seen. I don't he'll ever be great, but hope can turn decent. Maybe. Then, Hughes gave us Dach, Newhook, Barron, Matheson (FFS)... for the second straight year he f***ed up the goaltending situation. I am sorry... I don't see a huge difference. Some good, some bad... team still sucks and will continue to for a foreseeable future.
wow you're out to lunch here. None of this is even close to being accurate. Hughes is night and day from MB. No idea how you would justify this opinion. The sky is falling in your world, I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
23,063
18,030
We could go on, although I’m not sure I’d call it that — more about priorities and certain choices being made and their early fallouts, plus inherited baggage.

Head coach who doesn’t want experienced coaching staff around him, smallish team not physically dominant, needing more first line talent. GM has tried some young, reclamation projects — question for me is how long will he wait if he needs to cut bait.

They need to get their next moves right, esp. after this season when a whole lot of cap room is kicking in. There is still time to address several concerns.

We've been small and lacking goals since 94. They hang onto assets way too long, not drafting Leonard or Michkov , not moving friggen Barron like he was a prized asset.. Primeau.. .getting Newhook (another small player) nothing makes sense with this team. The irony that Allen and Kovacevic are exactly the players we need in this rebuild and they let them go .. why?

It's all so confusing, from the coaching decisions to the draft.
 

Jurivan Demidovsky

Registered User
Nov 26, 2024
49
89
He's not a center. Not a good idea. The same experience did nothig with Kovalev at center 15 years ago.
He plays just like a center. On the powerplay i would keep him on the left wing. I don't see the harm in trying it. Things can't possibly get worse then they already are. I never heard of or have seen Kovalev tried at center.
 

Jurivan Demidovsky

Registered User
Nov 26, 2024
49
89
We've been small and lacking goals since 94. They hang onto assets way too long, not drafting Leonard or Michkov , not moving friggen Barron like he was a prized asset.. Primeau.. .getting Newhook (another small player) nothing makes sense with this team. The irony that Allen and Kovacevic are exactly the players we need in this rebuild and they let them go .. why?

It's all so confusing, from the coaching decisions to the draft.
Kovacevic is a real head scratcher, the guy was a +11 on our dumpster fire of a team last season. 6'5" beast of a man. Makes no sense, Hugo fu.ked up on that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,551
157,160
We've been small and lacking goals since 94. They hang onto assets way too long, not drafting Leonard or Michkov , not moving friggen Barron like he was a prized asset.. Primeau.. .getting Newhook (another small player) nothing makes sense with this team. The irony that Allen and Kovacevic are exactly the players we need in this rebuild and they let them go .. why?

It's all so confusing, from the coaching decisions to the draft.
I hate to open old wounds and thus I’ve chosen to move on from Michkov.

Every time he performs will always sting a little but Habs did the same to the Flyers by snagging Caufield before their pick. Shit happens.

Maybe Reinbacher becomes something, maybe he doesn’t. We’ll just have to focus on the next decisions.

About Newhook, I’ll be curious to see if he gets a longer leash as a Quartexx client. Clearly, the Avs knew what they were doing.

Selling Kovacevic for a 4th pick was a mistake. Allen played on a Stanley Cup winner and was a good mentor. Primeau and probably Barron, that dollar store giraffe, have none to very limited trading value. Season is down the tubes anyway, they might as well both stay on as tank commanders. 💀
 

Ad

Ad

Ad