yianik
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2009
- 10,685
- 7,317
That is exactly the way it has to be.![]()
No Cup for 32 years, but still demanding lol.
That is exactly the way it has to be.![]()
“Near zero” by definition means more than zero, Albert.There's a more than zero chance that it happens, it's scientific fact.
Despite the recent winning streak, I was glued to this game hardest than any of the previous 7, it was playoff like and had many underdog components that the Habs will be facing if they make the playoffs.Not for people that watched the game.
I think so. I'm one of the few who doesn't worry about defense in that situation. We've seen Kirby Dach and Slaf learn to play that wing and Demidov is coming in with better base defending IMO.I want to see more from Slaf, this is year 3 and he is allowing lazy habits to remain in his game. I thought he was a guy who elevated his game when things mattered.
He is still young, and there is plenty of time, but from my perspective, he is a top-six player—just not top-line material unless he gets some high-octane fuel in his system.
Demidov will play with Suzuki, maybe not right away, but he will be there because NS is a notch above his current linemates, including Caufield. The addition of a second line center will allow MSL to have players in better roles that suit their skillsets.
It was tough to watch. Mind you, it wasn't as bad as nashville or detroit games. I thought Habs played a better defensive game. They were just putrid on offense.Still no Xhekaj... glad I didn't watch
Yeah, keep dreaming. The only change I see, if CBJs win tonight, is possibly Demidov. Possibly.We hopefully get Heineman back next game, and add Demidov. Then you take out Armia, Savard (Rest) and Pezzetta (Both Demi and Heine are better obviously). I'm sure we can clinch, bring Armia back for the playoffs. Xhekaj can come in to give Savard rest and give him some minutes before the playoffs. Kapanen could also swap with Newhook.
Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky
Laine-Newhook-Demidov
Anderson-Dvorak-Gallagher
Heineman-Evans-Kapanen
Guhle-Matheson
Hutson-Struble
Xhekaj-Carrier
Monty
I havent done GDT's in a couple of seasons now I check between periods.I’m always taken aback with how some people just say the same thing over and over and over again in the same thread. Life must be hard for their loved ones.
Why wouldn’t Heineman play for Pezzetta?Yeah, keep dreaming. The only change I see, if CBJs win tonight, is possibly Demidov. Possibly.
I flip flop on checking them out, I like hearing (almost) everyone’s takes, but most of the GDT’s are starting to read like Trump posting on Truth Social.I havent done GDT's in a couple of seasons now I check between periods.
I have no problem with criticism as long as it's constructive and has some reasoning behind it.
Unfortunatly you won't get much of that in the heat of the moment.
I want to see more from Slaf, this is year 3 and he is allowing lazy habits to remain in his game. I thought he was a guy who elevated his game when things mattered.
He is still young, and there is plenty of time, but from my perspective, he is a top-six player—just not top-line material unless he gets some high-octane fuel in his system.
Demidov will play with Suzuki, maybe not right away, but he will be there because NS is a notch above his current linemates, including Caufield. The addition of a second line center will allow MSL to have players in better roles that suit their skillsets.
Oh, I though he is still a no-go. If he is ready, then yeah. He should draw in. Heineman for Pezz and Demidov for Kapanen. But that's itWhy wouldn’t Heineman play for Pezzetta?
Remember when Habs tried him on another line and that was nicht gut? What Slaf needs is a strong kick in the ass... like sit him out a game (after/if Habs clinch). My only hope right now is that he is a total playoffs player and will transform by the flick of a switch when/if Habs make the playoffs.I agree with you on this. He’s shown that he’s capable of high end play, he’s just not consistent. He doesn’t move his feet enough and seems to watch to see what Caufield and Suzuki are going to do. I wonder if he’d do better on another line where he is more responsible for driving the play.
Need to win OT to clinch the playoffs hmmm I think I’ll keep Hutson on the bench
They must not think he's ready. He has lost all his momentum ever since Utah. Now with Armia's injury that line has become a shadow of what it once was 5v5.Why wouldn’t Heineman play for Pezzetta?
He's shading closer to the boards every game trying to create space. His shot isn't going to work from that steep angle he needs to get back to work from his office which are edges of the circle. It's up to the wingers to draw the defenders towards the middle which requires players moving into that space. The stationary wingers on either side of the net isn't going to get it done. It's a sad set up and the results have become predictable.
Aw shucksSo true
I always tought that you should be coaching this team
yes I didYou missed out on Knives-Fork?!?![]()
Why wouldn’t Heineman play for Pezzetta?
He’s still more useful than Pezzetta.They must not think he's ready. He has lost all his momentum ever since Utah. Now with Armia's injury that line has become a shadow of what it once was 5v5.
We probably would have clinched by now if they were still playing that game. It's not only the production but the playing time in the right end of the rink we miss.
Good for him.Heineman, let us remember, had just returned from an injury that had kept him out for two matches.
He was ready to hit the ice last weekend, but St. Louis opted to insert Michael Pezzetta into the lineup against the Ottawa Senators.
A choice which, it seems, was not very well received by the main person concerned.
According to Marinaro, Heineman was so displeased that he decided to walk to the arena rather than take the team bus, which is a 20-minute ride.