Savannah Skunk
Registered User
The NHL just needs to get rid of the shootout. It's a ridiculous gimmick that has way overstayed. If MLB can play unlimited OT, and so can the NBA and ties in the NFL almost never happen, then why can't the NHL settle their games the right way? Why do we have to be the stupid fringe pro sports league that has a skills competition at the end of games to decide the winner? Come on. We deserve better. Just keep going with OT until someone wins. Fans get more value for their dollar when watching in the arena. Games are settled with a true team win rather than a meaningless 1 v 1 shootout. And most importantly, the NHL stops looking like an amateur hour mickey mouse club who don't know how to properly market a game that should, by reason, be right behind football in terms of popularity.
Another route would be to award 3 points for a regulation win, 2 points for an OT or Shootout win, 1 point for an OT/Shootout loss, and 0 points for a regulation loss. Premiership Football uses a 3 point system. The only difference being regular season games when a draw only awards each team 1 point.
I like the shootout! I hope that it becomes a theater of skill and prowess when any NHL player can try a practiced special move to score and potentially win the game for his team. It provides closure to the game. Its also a chance for great players to bring their unique elite talent and show off a little for the fans. It`s entertaining.
Most importantly, a three point system with the shootout would amplify the importance of regulation wins in the regular season and the elite teams of the league would rise above the pack. That makes for some intense hockey.