Value of: Gudbranson for JVR ?

[Amadeus]

Straight up.

Thoughts?

Click to read more...

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

Straight up.

Thoughts?

That's awful

 

[Amadeus]

That's awful

He has had a tough time adjusting to Vancouver but there is still potential there.

Vancouver could add to him if its a little too lopsided.

 

[LeafGrief]

Not even close to interested.

JVR has 19 points in 23 games. Gudbranson has 3.

 

[7even]

He has had a tough time adjusting to Vancouver but there is still potential there.

Vancouver could add to him if its a little too lopsided.

Erik Gudbranson has been riding the promise of potential to successive NHL contracts since he entered the league. No thanks.

 

[LoovTrain]

No hablo Gudbranson

 

[Scorvat]

Sure

 

[wonton15]

Not even close to interested.

JVR has 19 points in 23 games. Gudbranson has 3.

Because Gudbranson can be judged by his point totals..

But still, this isn't close for Toronto. I do this as a Canucks fan easily

 

[Nylanders Flow]

Matt Martin vetoes this one.

Seriously though, JVR is worth more than Gudbranson.

 

[ThorNton Apologist]

Not even close to interested.

JVR has 19 points in 23 games. Gudbranson has 3.

Using points to compare value of a top 6 forward and a defensive defenseman

(Not saying Gudbranson is worth more)

 

[KGL]

Yuck. No interest in Gudbranson, especially for JVR.

 

[LeafGrief]

Because Gudbranson can be judged by his point totals..

But still, this isn't close for Toronto. I do this as a Canucks fan easily

Using points to compare value of a top 6 forward and a defensive defenseman

(Not saying Gudbranson is worth more)

I mean, that's kind of the point. Gudbranson has no offensive upside whatsoever, so I would think that we're not interested in trading JVR for him.

 

[Phion Keneuf]

Add Nucks 1st unprotected

 

[ThorNton Apologist]

I mean, that's kind of the point. Gudbranson has no offensive upside whatsoever, so I would think that we're not interested in trading JVR for him.

It's to acquire a need that's why Edmonton moves Hall for Larsson. No chance Larsson outscores Hall but it was still a good trade for them

 

[gorangers0525]

I mean, that's kind of the point. Gudbranson has no offensive upside whatsoever, so I would think that we're not interested in trading JVR for him.

Or defensive upside...lol

 

[Lunatik]

Straight up.

Thoughts?

I'm sure Matt Martin would love this

 

[notsocommonsense]

Straight up.

Thoughts?

Done, done and done

In a heartbeat. . . Leafs don't do this tho, ever

 

[TeddyBare]

Gudbranson sucks.

But JVR is INCREDIBLY overrated on most trade proposals.

With that being said, this sucks for Toronto. They need someone like Tanev.

 

[TheCLAM]

Straight up.

Thoughts?

Gudbranson sucks quit puffing the magic dragon

Luke Schenn level player

 

[notsocommonsense]

Not even close to interested.

JVR has 19 points in 23 games. Gudbranson has 3.

No way Toronto does this. . . But why bring up offensive stats comparing a top 6 winger to a defensive d man. . . The points are irrelevant

 

[LeafsNation149]

You're a Leafs fan?

 

[TheCLAM]

He has had a tough time adjusting to Vancouver but there is still potential there.

Vancouver could add to him if its a little too lopsided.

He's had a tough time adjusting to the NHL - the potential is there to be a bottom 2 defenseman

 

[kanucks25]

Bad trade for the leafs.

The Canucks would only want JVR in a lop-sided trade like this. Otherwise, JVR is too old for the rebuild.

 

[Liferleafer]

Straight up.

Thoughts?

Thoughts? Lots of them...all of which are bad and contain profanity.

 

[slimbob8]

Bad trade for the leafs.

The Canucks would only want JVR in a lop-sided trade like this. Otherwise, JVR is too old for the rebuild.

Have they even accepted that a rebuild is necessary yet? As for the OP, obviously awful for TO.