St Louis interested
Imagine getting Lindstein from them
Where you seeing St. Louis being interested?
St Louis interested
Imagine getting Lindstein from them
And yet, that somehow wouldn't surprise me.it's not over yet, they could still claim him on waivers
I'm just relieved the Canucks didn't sign Tony DeAngelo, and I can't believe the possibility even entered my mind, but here we are. What a timeline this is turning out to be.
I know it is absolutely dreaming
but islander fans are literally certain Dobson is gone at the deadline
Are these offers for Petey? Because no way JT gets anything close to that in return.
Which would at least be entertaining, and that's more than I can say for their games of late.Can't imagine DeAngelo ever playing on a Tocchet coached team without Tocchet himself likely clubbing him into unconsciousness with a chair.
It's like being asked to use discretion when before starting a TV show or movie. Don't all of use discretion pretty much automatically at all times, because we're alive? I can't not use discretion any time I choose between one thing and another. Do you think I'm just sitting here in a tub of electrolyte jelly like it's The Matrix?
My heart likes all these trades ( save for Rangers and Boston )Same teams my take:
Canes: KK, Roslovic, Morrow, 1st
Rags: Chytil , unprotected 1st
Devils: Mercer, Nemec
Bruins: Zacha, Zadorov, 1st ( top 5 protected)
Stars: None
Buffalo: Cozens, 2nd
When these rumors first started, I thought both Utah and STL would both be interested.
Miller is an Armstrong bros type of player
If St.Louis is truly a suitor I wonder if they'd be looking at swapping Kyrou? There was a lot of talk last year about possibly trading him before his NMC kicks in.
I was assuming they're more looking to move Buchnevich, but Kyrou would be great.If St.Louis is truly a suitor I wonder if they'd be looking at swapping Kyrou? There was a lot of talk last year about possibly trading him before his NMC kicks in.
I think Jamie Dodd's rant here is mostly correct. It's why I thought there was a very narrow path for Allvin to turn the team into a contender when he took over (and I think he's largely done a solid job). It was just a tough job to begin with given the dearth of prospects, cap liabilities, etc. But it also was possible that this core...just ain't it. And there was no combination of moves that could put them over the top.
DeAngelo was too toxic for a KHL team. The odds of him imploding the Isle is like 90%.Can't imagine DeAngelo ever playing on a Tocchet coached team without Tocchet himself likely clubbing him into unconsciousness with a chair.
Why would anyone want to pay 9-11 million for Luke Hughes, and why would this team want to give up 2 first round picks when they are on the precipice of potentially being a lottery team for the next couple of seasons?
I think Jamie Dodd's rant here is mostly correct. It's why I thought there was a very narrow path for Allvin to turn the team into a contender when he took over (and I think he's largely done a solid job). It was just a tough job to begin with given the dearth of prospects, cap liabilities, etc. But it also was possible that this core...just ain't it. And there was no combination of moves that could put them over the top.
This is how I see it too. They were always going to need to thread the needle on executing their compete now! approach, and they largely did up until this summer, but no one could have reasonably thought that the reason they would have failed to execute their plan was a combination of: (a) JT Miller turning into a huge bozo again; (b) JT Miller and Pettersson not being able to get along; (c) JT Miller's play dropping off due to him being a baby; (c) Pettersson starting to score at like half the rate he is capable of; and (d) Demko (and I know he's injury prone) suffering a totally novel injury for a goalie to suffer and (at least as of now) going from a Vezina candidate to a below average/below 900 svp goalie.We have agreed on this for a long time. I never really believed the "short window" concept when it was first floated due to a bunch of confounding factors mostly related to the cap (ie. recapture, trying to build largely through FA and trade, the wide range of assumptions needed for it to work etc.).
I will say, however, where we are today is totally insane and I did not see this happening. To go from the high of last year to an absolute disaster was not on my bingo card. I would have proposed more of a gradual improvement (with a notable ceiling) following by a decline forcing a rebuild. Where we are today was completely outside consideration when this strategy was initially proposed.
You could argue the strategy wasn't entirely wrong based on last year, but we've arrived at a far worse spot than I ever imagined.