Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Looking for a D-Man to Save Us

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,222
48,397
Junktown
Chalk me up as not really being in on Matheson. Defensively he is pretty suspect. Questionable decision-making and zone entry defending.

I also kinda take issue with the "puck-mover" descriptor. I think he's less of a puck mover than a puck-rusher. He likes to carry it. A lot of the talk about his offensive game and "puck-moving" have come from people looking at the points column, where he is mostly getting points on the PP1 - which he would not be doing in VAN.
His production would certainly dip due to almost no powerplay time and just decreased ice time in general. He played 500 more minutes than any other defender on the Canadiens last season. However, I do think he'd be an effective, but flawed, middle-pairing if played with the right partner. He alone wouldn't fix a lot of the team's problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: God and bossram

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,186
93,576
Vancouver, BC
Matheson is a good player who would help here but you'd be paying a premium for his PP production and 62 points last year.

The reason for Montreal to sell now is that Hutson is going to take over PP1 and those minutes/points and value premium are going to disappear.
 

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,599
1,477
in a dream world, we somehow swap one or both of desharnais and myers for luke schenn and add from there

hughes - hronek
soucy - xxx/schenn
brannstrom - schenn/xxx

feels a lot more balanced and a reasonable spot to build the defense up from. myers, soucy, and desharnais are not bad players / non-nhlers in isolation, but they don't all fit together in the same group.

Schenn is a 14/15 min a night guy nowadays. He's worse than Myers. That said I wish they'd have thrown 6 or 7 million over three years in 2023. He probably would have bit. I miss the Sheriff.

Myers has not been as bad as some folks claim. That said, that pairing isn't working even though it did last year. One of them needs to drop to the third pairing and a legit 20 min guy brought in that can kill penalties and eat hard minutes. Cole and Big Z insulated them a lot last year. A damn sight more than Brannstrom and Desharnais/Juulsen.

Nobody is cutting Vancouver a deal right now. They are going to need to be patient unless a team really gets desperate to move a player.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
874
851
Erik Karlsson and Marcus Pettersson pairing are giving up almost 1.5 even strength goals per game.

Nick Seeler would be a cheap 3rd pair option.

Mason Lohrei if they want a bit more of a project. Size and speed though.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
28,222
48,397
Junktown
Dumoulin is slow but he's still effective and pulling positive goal differentials from top-pairing high-leverage minutes with a terrible Anaheim team. He'd be a big upgrade here.

That’s interesting because he was not good with the Kraken last season. At least from what I recall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkusNaslund19

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,186
93,576
Vancouver, BC
That’s interesting because he was not good with the Kraken last season. At least from what I recall.

I think there was some dissonance between the HE SLOW eye test and the actual numbers which look pretty good - a plus player on a bad team, positive advanced stats.

He's playing more and in higher leverage this year for Anaheim and continuing to do well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Quinning

Registered User
Mar 18, 2008
27,066
14,750
The player this team truly needs is Rasmus Andersson, but Calgary will likely hang onto him now. And he would cost an outrageous amount...think Willander, Lekk and a 1st.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,808
17,376
Victoria
His production would certainly dip due to almost no powerplay time and just decreased ice time in general. He played 500 more minutes than any other defender on the Canadiens last season. However, I do think he'd be an effective, but flawed, middle-pairing if played with the right partner. He alone wouldn't fix a lot of the team's problems.
That's what I'm getting at. His best attributes are leveraged due to getting a lot of deployment in offensive situations, which isn't what will happen in VAN.

He's also like Myers in that he's chaotic. A lot of tools (physical, good size, great skater, big shot) but no toolbox and prone to braincramps.

You can't put him with Myers, and putting him with Hronek would be a pretty defensively frustrating pair.

They need a guy who raises the floor of their non-Hughes minutes, not a high-variance guy on both sides of the puck.
 

Phrasing

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
4,920
3,245
I’m not sure Matheson is the right target as his value has baked-in PP offense from last year which he won’t receive here. Dumoulin I’m not a fan of because he had really slow moments in Seattle and I watched him a lot there. Pettersson would be an ok grab. Maybe Carrier if Nashville sinks more or Fowler if dirt cheap and retained.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleach Clean

pitseleh

Registered User
Jul 30, 2005
19,418
3,586
Vancouver
Matheson’s got strong zone exit/entry numbers but his defensive results have never been great, and they’ve fallen off since he joined Montreal. Some of that is probably him playing higher leverage minutes, but at even strength you may be getting more of a Brannstrom-level impact rather than a defender that this team needs to carry a pairing defensively.

With his production you have to assume some team that needs a PP QB will pay more for him than the Canucks will.
 

Curm

Registered User
Nov 19, 2024
23
29
I'd be real careful trading any more high picks or prospects, they already need to do a far better job at augmenting their lineup with quality players on entry level contracts.

If they had Willander and maybe another solid youngish entry level LHD, instead of paying Forbort and Desharnais a combined $3.5 million, and up front, had a top player on an ELC instead of DeBrusk at $5.5 million, they'd be in a much better position to trade picks and accommodate the salary of a difference maker right now.

And if at least one of the D was far enough along, they wouldn't be faced with overplaying guys like Soucy and Myers.

They'd even be better off today if they had started the year with Willander and Lekkerimaki on ELCs, and Zadorov, instead of Debrusk, Desharnais, and Forbort and have a bit more cap room to add.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad