Grub's Canucks & NHL News, Rumours, and & Fantasy GM | Hockey Starts Now

VanillaCoke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2013
26,076
12,753
Lindholm seems to be playing well. Zadorov looks massively overpaid.
Their play is irrelevant to my disgust but not likely zad is worth that contract.


(Lindholm was good here even when not scoring and ppls vitriol was misplaced because of acquisition cost, that wasn't really much either. Also I'd rather have kept horvat or Lindholm and moved ep to Carolina or whatever)
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,765
4,970
You’d have to replace Heinen on the roster too so add another ~$1 million.

Realistically re-signing Zadorov would have meant him plus two ~$1 million players ($7 million) instead of Myers, Desharnais, and Heinen ($7.25 million).

Can see an argument that would have been preferable but it would have materially hurt the team’s depth.

Sounds like Zadorov would have come in a bit cheaper (I saw 4.6 million) if he signed with Vancouver which makes sense.

But ya, you are correct you probably need to get rid of Myers as well. Which would create its own issues in that finding a RD at the deadline will likely be more difficult than finding a LD. With that said, I think Zadorov over Myers in the long run is actually preferable.


All Zadorov has to do is do something he's never done before.

Not true. He was a top three defensemen for us in the playoffs. More accurately, he hasn't been able to do it for a long stretch.
 

Bertuzzzi44

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
4,097
3,888
Canucks top 20 players - 24 & under
  1. Hoglander 24
  2. Lekkerimaki 20
  3. Willander 20
  4. Silovs 23
  5. Pettersson 20
  6. Raty 22
  7. Bains 24
  8. Aman 24
  9. Kudryavtsev 20
  10. Mynio 19
  11. McWard 23
  12. Klimovich 22
  13. Woo 24
  14. Tolopilo 24
  15. Sasson 23
  16. Bloom 21
  17. Pattersson 18
  18. Fernstrom 18
  19. Romani 18
  20. Alriksson 19

Besides Hoglander wonder who’ll be on the big club 2 years from now.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad