World Cup: - Group D: USA vs. Australia, 6/19/2026 | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

World Cup: Group D: USA vs. Australia, 6/19/2026

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15

What's the result?


  • Total voters
    31
  • This poll will close: .
Maybe in your hockey bubble.....because Pulisic is much more well known than Jack Hughes worldwide....and also in the US pre-Olympics. 8 million followers to 1 million via insta....even post hero Gold and dating McRae. :laugh:

I think what he means is that Hughes is a better player compared with the top hockey players than Pulisic is compared with the top football players.

That’s what the “relatively” is supposed to mean.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Maybe in your hockey bubble.....because Pulisic is much more well known than Jack Hughes worldwide....and also in the US pre-Olympics. 8 million followers to 1 million via insta....even post hero Gold and dating McRae. :laugh:
Hughes is much more famous in hockey circles when compared relatively to Pulisic in the football world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
I don’t think it matters too much that Pulisic is out. That being said Poch made an assumption here that Australia would not try to win possession so by using Pepi he clearly believes Australia will park the bus so much we should just shoot the ball 20-30 times.
 
What he means is that Hughes is a better player compared with the top hockey players than Pulisic is compared with the top football players.

That’s what the “relatively” is supposed to mean.
Fair I guess. But even that gets dicey because we are talking about USA teams. Jack was a 3rd liner on team USA. Meanwhile Pulisic is the face and single well known star of US Soccer (right or wrong).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
I don’t think it matters too much that Pulisic is out. That being said Poch made an assumption here that Australia would not try to win possession so by using Pepi he clearly believes Australia will park the bus so much we should just shoot the ball 20-30 times.
The betting lines didn’t move much at all which is likely pretty telling most don’t think it moved the needle a ton
 
Fair I guess. But even that gets dicey because we are talking about USA teams. Jack was a 3rd liner on team USA. Meanwhile Pulisic is the face and single well known star of US Soccer (right or wrong).

In fairness, the US men's hockey team is also the reigning Olympic gold medalist. The men's soccer team last won a World Cup in...

... yeah. We haven't. Or come very close in any tournament that's remotely relevant to this year's tournament (3rd/4th/tied for 3rd nearly a hundred years ago means basically jack shit when it comes to 2026).
 
  • Like
Reactions: koyvoo
I don’t think it matters too much that Pulisic is out. That being said Poch made an assumption here that Australia would not try to win possession so by using Pepi he clearly believes Australia will park the bus so much we should just shoot the ball 20-30 times.
I think it's mostly going to come down to whether the pace of the Aussie attack gives our iffy backline issues. I rate Robinson and Dest generally more significant to our overall attack than Pulisic, so him being out isn't the end of the world.

Pepi has kind of been trash since that one Gold Cup/qualifying cycle, I'm surprised he didn't go with Reyna or somebody else. But it gives a big body for those defenders to deal with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
I think it's mostly going to come down to whether the pace of the Aussie attack gives our iffy backline issues. I rate Robinson and Dest generally more significant to our overall attack than Pulisic, so him being out isn't the end of the world.

I think it's pretty reasonably clear that if we don't win it'll be because there's a conspiracy of biased officiating against us and there's no way it'll be anything other than a win if the match is officiated fairly.

:sarcasm:
 
  • Like
Reactions: koyvoo
I think it's mostly going to come down to whether the pace of the Aussie attack gives our iffy backline issues. I rate Robinson and Dest generally more significant to our overall attack than Pulisic, so him being out isn't the end of the world.
Australia’s coach did a Pep and benched those players so they could set an even lower block.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad