French roster is comparable to what..the Canada Z team![]()
Tavares hurt himself in in Košice, otherwise nothing special on paper but they play Hockey definitely entertaining to watch.geez didnt know our team was looking that bad on paper,did everyone refuse to goi think only Stone makes the real team
France is not that bad definitely not GB or Italy caliber, slightly better than Austria as well. If they didn’t miss their best players, they could have fought for quarterfinals.Canada struggling against France LOL
France isn't moving forwards, it's Italy moving backward. France is roughly where they have always been (in somewhat recent times), producing quality player every 5 years or so and moderately decent European pro-level depth. As their U20 results indicate they aren't catching up to anything though and will likely get overtaken eventually by Belarus and Kazakhstan.I will say this, France must have invested immensely in their hockey program because it seems like they just keep improving, I remember a time when France and Italy were about the same level and now France is miles ahead of Italy and are very quickly catching up to the big dogs, France is no easy out for anyone anymore and that is good to see.
Tavares hurt himself in in Košice, otherwise nothing special on paper but they play Hockey definitely entertaining to watch.
Btw. even Chabot is capable to make A team, possible even Marchessault.
I wouldn't say immensely, but yeah there are stuff that have been done the right way in the last few years.I will say this, France must have invested immensely in their hockey program because it seems like they just keep improving, I remember a time when France and Italy were about the same level and now France is miles ahead of Italy and are very quickly catching up to the big dogs, France is no easy out for anyone anymore and that is good to see.
I disagree with you. Some things are definitely improving:France isn't moving forwards, it's Italy moving backward. France is roughly where they have always been, producing quality player every 5 years or so and moderately decent European pro-level depth. As their U20 results indicate they aren't catching up to anything though and will likely get overtaken eventually by Belarus and Kazakhstan.
I think you understand full well those are such baby steps compared to flat out hockey revolutions that underwent in Hungary, Belarus or Kazakhstan. Sure it's better than nothing but.. The impact of those is going to be minor. For example, more league games will allow more stability and lower level depth but will do little to top end talent. Same with the new rules, top end players should and do move abroad anyway.I disagree with you. Some things are definitely improving:
-The league is better structured, more games are being played (44)
-More good standard rinks are being built
-Rules have been implemtented to allow young french players to actually play
-Hockey is moving to the big cities which is mandatory for hockey development (Marseille, Bordeaux,Lyon..)
-etc..
Still not fast enough, but improving.