GDT: Group A • Dec. 31 • Canada vs. USA • Part III

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't review goalie interference in IIHF so idk why people are complaining, it's the rules
 
The only way that goal shoudn't have counted would be goalie interference, and thats not reviewable
 
Canada is destroying them. Probably going to end up out shooting them by a 2 to 1 margin.
 
#1: Goalie interference isn't reviewable

#2: He's allowed to be in the crease

#3: No distinct kicking motion
 
You can't review goalie interference in IIHF so idk why people are complaining, it's the rules

You also have to add that it really is impossible to see if it was a good goal or not. None of the angles helped.

If the call on the ice was good goal, don't you need definitive evidence to overturn it? There really wasn't any definitive evidence that it wasn't a goal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad