Movies: Greatest director of all-time
- Thread starter Hippasus
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Jumptheshark
Rebooting myself
For me you have too many modern directors. I would break it up into 20 year segments.
And I will start with three controversial names not in your pick
1) D.W Griffiths. Due to the context of his movies his name has been stricken from the list of great directors. HE invented the epic movies and shooting big.
2) Charlie Chaplin. Like Griffiths some people do not like talking about his work. While it was the subject matter that gets DW into trouble it is Chaplins personal life that gets him into trouble
3) Buster Keaton. To this day some of the ways he shot movies is used. The problem was he was a hard task master and reportedly for actors into dangerous roles
Others for consideration not on the list over the more modern guys
De Mille
Hawkes
Billy Walder
Frank Capra
John Ford
Fellini--that fact you have inferior directors on the list over him is sad
Bertolucci
De Palma
Fritz Lang
Woody Allen? Like with Griffiths, Chaplin and Keaton people are trying to get people to forget his movies
But the big one is Victor Fleming!!! His 1939 production is legendary. But there are two movies you may never heard of as they never got played that often after their release (sarcasm just incase you miss it) Gone with the Wind and Wizard of OZ!!
And I will start with three controversial names not in your pick
1) D.W Griffiths. Due to the context of his movies his name has been stricken from the list of great directors. HE invented the epic movies and shooting big.
2) Charlie Chaplin. Like Griffiths some people do not like talking about his work. While it was the subject matter that gets DW into trouble it is Chaplins personal life that gets him into trouble
3) Buster Keaton. To this day some of the ways he shot movies is used. The problem was he was a hard task master and reportedly for actors into dangerous roles
Others for consideration not on the list over the more modern guys
De Mille
Hawkes
Billy Walder
Frank Capra
John Ford
Fellini--that fact you have inferior directors on the list over him is sad
Bertolucci
De Palma
Fritz Lang
Woody Allen? Like with Griffiths, Chaplin and Keaton people are trying to get people to forget his movies
But the big one is Victor Fleming!!! His 1939 production is legendary. But there are two movies you may never heard of as they never got played that often after their release (sarcasm just incase you miss it) Gone with the Wind and Wizard of OZ!!
Pranzo Oltranzista
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 4,022
- 2,934
frisco
Some people claim that there's a woman to blame...
Voted Kubrick.
David Fincher deserves to be on the list on nominees since the list is modern-heavy but there are a lot of great directors.
My Best-Carey
David Fincher deserves to be on the list on nominees since the list is modern-heavy but there are a lot of great directors.
My Best-Carey
I agree. Too many new guys that more or less make each other redundant. Like Oliver Stone? There are a lot better directors from the golden era that I would put over his movies
It's a silly question for a cinephile. There are numerous great directors masters of their art who have all contributed the fabric of cinema. Placing one above the other is a pointless exercise.
You have omitted so many directors too. The Russian school ? Tarkovsky, Konchalovksky, Zvyagintsev, Vertov, to name just three. Or even directors like Klushantsev inspired by Cosmism that in turn inspired Star Wars. The Czech school especially the New Wave. Forman, Juraj Herz, Vera Chytilova to name three. The Polish school Kryztof Kieslowski, Andrezj Wajda, Polanski to name but three. The Hungarian Bela Tarr. The numerous French directors like Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer. Germany from Lang onwards to Fassbinder & Wenders. In Britain from Pressburger to Loach & India with Satajit Ray.
There is a huge world of cinema out there with so many superb films most people who utter Spielberg (who is a very decent director with the likes of the masterpiece that is Schindler's List) don't even know about. Not even forgetting Italian cinema & Italian horror & realism too.
You have omitted so many directors too. The Russian school ? Tarkovsky, Konchalovksky, Zvyagintsev, Vertov, to name just three. Or even directors like Klushantsev inspired by Cosmism that in turn inspired Star Wars. The Czech school especially the New Wave. Forman, Juraj Herz, Vera Chytilova to name three. The Polish school Kryztof Kieslowski, Andrezj Wajda, Polanski to name but three. The Hungarian Bela Tarr. The numerous French directors like Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer. Germany from Lang onwards to Fassbinder & Wenders. In Britain from Pressburger to Loach & India with Satajit Ray.
There is a huge world of cinema out there with so many superb films most people who utter Spielberg (who is a very decent director with the likes of the masterpiece that is Schindler's List) don't even know about. Not even forgetting Italian cinema & Italian horror & realism too.
Jumptheshark
Rebooting myself
That is why I suggested that breaking it up into either decades or 10 year spans. Not saying that all directors named are not good there but there are a lot better not named
For Russians Sergei Eisenstein is one who should be named for if only for the movie Battleship Potemkin.
Hippasus
1,9,45,165,495,1287,
The list I gave above is mostly comprised of directors that stood out to me from a couple decades ago when I used to watch a lot of movies. The 70s have been called the golden age of cinema. I guess I forgot Orson Welles and should have had Robert Altman too. Old-timey suggestions are appreciated. One can just frame it as a discussion and ignore the poll aspect if that is more legitimate. I can't edit polls.
Bounces R Way
Registered User
This is a very good question with many good answers but one of my personal favorites is Paul Thomas Anderson. Boasts a diverse catalogue of really engaging movies. The Master is something I find myself revisiting often.
Scorsese would have to be up there as well. He sticks to specific subject matter sure but he consistently delivers excellent storytelling. Tarantino and Nolan I find are a little overrated but typically enjoy more often than not. Lucas, Spielberg, Cameron, and Ridley Scott all blazed a specific trail in film making that they'll forever be carved in stone for. Hitchcock and Kubrick really belong in their own category. Guy Ritchie should be an option if only for his dry wit and soundtracks.
Wouldn't self identify as a big hipster but I do think Wes Anderson makes some visually incredible movies. We get it with the symmetry after a while but he regularly gets a 400 million dollar cast get to work together for actor league minimum. They look like fun projects to be a part of. This is really one of those rare questions that I think doesn't have an objectively correct answer OP tough call
Scorsese would have to be up there as well. He sticks to specific subject matter sure but he consistently delivers excellent storytelling. Tarantino and Nolan I find are a little overrated but typically enjoy more often than not. Lucas, Spielberg, Cameron, and Ridley Scott all blazed a specific trail in film making that they'll forever be carved in stone for. Hitchcock and Kubrick really belong in their own category. Guy Ritchie should be an option if only for his dry wit and soundtracks.
Wouldn't self identify as a big hipster but I do think Wes Anderson makes some visually incredible movies. We get it with the symmetry after a while but he regularly gets a 400 million dollar cast get to work together for actor league minimum. They look like fun projects to be a part of. This is really one of those rare questions that I think doesn't have an objectively correct answer OP tough call
