Finlandia WOAT
No blocks, No slappers
- May 23, 2010
- 24,414
- 24,687
Aside from that being a cliche
It's an accurate statement.
Skinner is not an elite player and already tries to do too much on his own, often resulting in a turnover. A legit playmaker on his line would make him that much more dangerous in my opinion. I like the the physical game Ruutu and JStaal bring but without speed it gets you very little in transition. When EStaal played with both Cole and Ruutu it had that nice blend of power and speed.
That's fair. We'll just have to see if Ruutu has regained any of his speed.
If he's slow as molasses, then I agree, Jokinen would be the better option. The problem is that Ruutu is then put on the third line, where we wouldn't get nearly as much out of him should he play with Skinner and J. Staal.
IMO, Jokinen on third and Ruutu on 2nd gives us more than Jokinen on 2nd and Ruutu on 3rd. It's the potential drop off in Ruutu's production from the 2nd to the third that is my main concern.
In terms of possession players, I'm hard pressed to think of anyone better than JStaal along the boards. Though Skinner can be strong on his skates at times and certainly shifty, I think JStaal is already significantly better in that regard. If we're talking puckhandling though, Skinner is better than JStaal.
Jordan is (by far) our best player on the boards; he can shrug off full body checks and keep on going.
The problem is that, right now, that skill set is limited to just getting it deep. I'm not concerned, he has been a grinder for the past 7 years, and it's clear that he's learning how to use that to play keep away with Skinner and get some great chances (the last two games are a great example). But Jordan plays a game that is focused on the forecheck (getting it deep, grinding it out). Skinner tries to play the puck possession game (transition, play keep away, open holes).
Neither player can play the other side of the game nearly as well (as you said), but when they learn, we will have two dangerous lines. We already do, in a sense.
IMO, that's why our first line is so dangerous. They can play both sides of the game extremely well.