Is that what the gorilla was suppose to do? Like what did anyone expect?
Is it wrong to value the life of an endangered specie more than the life of a not-even-close to be endangered specie and to have some kind of openness towards the life of other animals instead of demonstrating incredible "selfishness" towards your own specie?I have to hope that most of the replies on here are simply people trying to "look cool" or controversial on the internet.
If you have to kill an animal to save a child's life, you do. Plain and simple.
Not saying it isn't sad, because it is. But you choose the child over the animal every time.
Is it wrong to value the life of an endangered specie more than the life of a not-even-close to be endangered specie and to have some kind of openness towards the life of other animals instead of demonstrating incredible "selfishness" towards your own specie?
Exactly. Kids are curious by default
Parents should have done more to stop him but whatever
Gorilla DRAGGED THE KID
Is it wrong to value the life of an endangered specie more than the life of a not-even-close to be endangered specie and to have some kind of openness towards the life of other animals instead of demonstrating incredible "selfishness" towards your own specie?
Was there literally no option for tranquilization over just straight up killing the thing?
Because the bullet that can take down such a beast is much safer.Supposedly the tranquilizer necessary to take down such a beast would be a lethal dose for the child.
Bullet seemed safer
Because the bullet that can take down such a beast is much safer.
It's just a case of zoo officials not acting fast enough (none of this would have happened after the child got into the cage if they had preventively tranquilized the gorilla and wanting to save their own safe with what I believe to be an even dumber decision.
Regarding your earings thing, it has nothing to do with my point. Your compared elements do not match with those in this actual scenario.
At first it appeared that the gorilla was protective but then it just dragged the child through the water HOW CAN YOU DO THAT
Can someone, once and for all, explain to me if ix is a troll or just a total manchild as I long have suspected. I just need to know. I'm not privy to the joke despite being here over ten years.....so end my misery once and for all.
In the meantime......
How about the fact HE'S A ****ING GORILLA!!!! A WILD ANIMAL!!!!
I have to hope that most of the replies on here are simply people trying to "look cool" or controversial on the internet.
If you have to kill an animal to save a child's life, you do. Plain and simple.
Not saying it isn't sad, because it is. But you choose the child over the animal every time.
I understand why it was done. But it's just another fine example of why we suck as a species.
It completely does.
One is abundantly replaceable. The other is not.
And what we are discussing is much bigger than 4 generation sentimental value.