Waived: Goodrow waived (claimed by San Jose Sharks)

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,973
126,759
NYC
Accepting a NTC as opposed to a NMC is

1) More attractive to the team.

2) Sort of a bet on yourself. You can play well and get traded. You can get traded because you're playing well. It raises your value. It all depends on the circumstances. A NTC prevents that. Guys have an understanding that if they play like ass, they could still be waived.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,403
21,074
I guess they arent exactly going to run it back. Not like Goodrow is a core piece but they arent creating room just to to sign their RFAs.
 

Mac n Gs

Drury plz
Jan 17, 2014
22,742
13,267
He was a good pro and vet for this group, but we all knew that contract wasn’t going to be on the books for its entirety the second it was signed.

He got overplayed too much by Gallant, but Laviolette realized that he filled one specific role on the team and kept him in it. When they’re facing another cap crunch soon, he was the lowest hanging fruit to help clear some space. Somebody will pick him up for cheap pretty quickly if he’s bought out
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,780
23,763
Do waivers nullify a NTC?

Serious question, I have no idea.
You already got the short answer, CapFriendly gives you the longer one:

Capture.JPG


I guess they arent exactly going to run it back. Not like Goodrow is a core piece but they arent creating room just to to sign their RFAs.
That much is obvious, and it makes it exciting. Like said before, signing Kakko could also make him more attractive in a trade. There could be big things cooking. Or the Rangers might go after a guy like Guenzel (or hell, even Reinhart I guess).
 

will1066

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
48,051
67,095
He was a good pro and vet for this group, but we all knew that contract wasn’t going to be on the books for its entirety the second it was signed.

He got overplayed too much by Gallant, but Laviolette realized that he filled one specific role on the team and kept him in it. When they’re facing another cap crunch soon, he was the lowest hanging fruit to help clear some space. Somebody will pick him up for cheap pretty quickly if he’s bought out

And then he'll be earning two checks. Win-win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yrrebbor

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,188
57,148
In High Altitoad
I guess they arent exactly going to run it back. Not like Goodrow is a core piece but they arent creating room to sign RFAs.

They were never going to run it back with exactly the same squad.

We'll know how serious they are about improving the team with what ever comes after this but it's a step in the right direction. We'll see if Drury has the balls to make the "tougher" moves.
 

bigdog16

Registered User
Nov 7, 2013
4,619
4,631
USA
Why would anyone claim him? Wouldn't a team who's trying to get to the cap floor just approach the Rangers and say hey we will take Goodrow's contract but add a "x" round pick to him. Seems kind of dumb for a team to claim him in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yrrebbor

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,403
21,074
Not to get ahead of myself but this is a shot across the bow of Trouba in some ways, imo. His NMC shifts to an NTC on July 1, and it's possible he could be in the same situation. It kind of nullifies his trade protection. Jacob may have to open up his options to the Rangers in order to actually facilitate a trade to a place he is happy. Because technically the Rangers could waive him and let some bottom feeder uproot his life for the next 2 seasons.
 

surlysailor

Registered User
May 12, 2012
691
400
BK
Why would anyone claim him? Wouldn't a team who's trying to get to the cap floor just approach the Rangers and say hey we will take Goodrow's contract but add a "x" round pick to him. Seems kind of dumb for a team to claim him in my opinion.
A team needing to get to the cap floor might be on goodrows no trade list. Nyr can prob make an arrangement like you claim him we’ll trade this prospect or pick for an upcoming ufa or a salary dump back or something
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,188
57,148
In High Altitoad
Why would anyone claim him? Wouldn't a team who's trying to get to the cap floor just approach the Rangers and say hey we will take Goodrow's contract but add a "x" round pick to him. Seems kind of dumb for a team to claim him in my opinion.

As others have speculated, it could basically be that the Rangers had something worked out with another team and he refused to go there so they said "fine, we'll waive you and rid ourselves of the hit" with out anything coming back.

Not sure that this is what happened here but with the timing, the above makes sense. If he goes unclaimed then I dont really get it at all.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,403
21,074
Why would anyone claim him? Wouldn't a team who's trying to get to the cap floor just approach the Rangers and say hey we will take Goodrow's contract but add a "x" round pick to him. Seems kind of dumb for a team to claim him in my opinion.

If a team isnt worried about the contract, he isnt a bad player. A young team outside the playoffs would probably love to have him. Hes also the type of guy they could retain money on and be real valuable at the deadline. Rangers just arent in position for that.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,148
23,598
Not to get ahead of myself but this is a shot across the bow of Trouba in some ways, imo. His NMC shifts to an NTC on July 1, and it's possible he could be in the same situation. It kind of nullifies his trade protection. Jacob may have to open up his options to the Rangers in order to actually facilitate a trade to a place he is happy. Because technically the Rangers could waive him and let some bottom feeder uproot his life for the next 2 seasons.
Damn I feel so bad for him. Getting overpaid by about 5 million or so and having to move to some "shitty" place to play for 2 years.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,148
23,598
Who knows what the truth is but if it Drury waiving Goodrow because he declined a trade to a team he didn't want to go to good. Drury showing balls unlike many of our previous gm's never did.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,403
21,074
Damn I feel so bad for him. Getting overpaid by about 5 million or so and having to move to some "shitty" place to play for 2 years.

I get the sentiment on your end but im sure he doesnt want to leave NYC with a wife who became a doctor here and a newborn kid. They are human beings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yrrebbor and bl02

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,148
23,598
I get the sentiment on your end but im sure he doesnt want to leave NYC with a wife who became a doctor here and a newborn kid. They are human beings.
I understand the human being thing I do but its 2 more years then he can decide again pretty much where he wants to go. In some cases its ok for the organizations to what's best for the team.
 

will1066

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
48,051
67,095
Well, Drury's got three options now if he goes unclaimed.

1) Keep him and pretend nothing happened (which would be awkward for both parties)
2) Wade Redden him
3) Buy him out
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad