Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 25,218
- 16,836
DC has always been for Canada first, but he supports the US too. Hopefully CBC brings him back, because their intermissions are lesser not having him.
PGT: Gold Medal Game | USA vs Canada | PGT
- Thread starter Canucks LB
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
DC has always been for Canada first, but he supports the US too. Hopefully CBC brings him back, because their intermissions are lesser not having him.
Thenameless
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2014
- 3,866
- 1,801
I thought we'd still do it, even without Lafreniere. Turns out, he could have been a difference maker. Either way, congratulations to the USA for a well earned victory.
violaswallet
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2019
- 9,517
- 8,167
I listened to his podcast: I think you can tell his age at times (ie less sharp, not a comment on his views)
Tasty Biscuits
with fancy sauce
Congrats to the US team. Obviously Canada having Lafreniere would've been a big boost, but US also could've added Jack Hughes and Nick Robertson to an already dominate top-6, so that's pretty much a wash for the game at this level. Single elimination, anything can happen, US had played a very solid team game with good goaltending.
KrazyKings
Registered User
Such an amazing feeling to watch the US take it.
Love watching the young guns duke it out and the US players showed how much they had!
I have a feeling the ducks and kings fans will love the turcotte/zegras rivalry. The US has a great group of young forwards.
Love watching the young guns duke it out and the US players showed how much they had!
I have a feeling the ducks and kings fans will love the turcotte/zegras rivalry. The US has a great group of young forwards.
novisor
Registered User
It was a good world juniors and holiday season, wish the ending was a little better. I only frequent these forums as the tournament starts to near until it wraps up. It was a pleasure discussing and debating with you all. Until next year, Novisor signing-off.
puck swami
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2004
- 269
- 59
I've been watching the tournament from inside and outside for many years, and there are a few observations I've learned that are worth repeating:
1) In a short tournament, you almost always need your goaltending to be elite to have a shot at it. Knight tossed a shoutout in the biggest game, and you cannot ask more from any goalie than to keep the opposing pucks out of the net. When skaters are confident in their goaltending, they are free to be more creative and dynamic to make plays.
2) Your 19-year olds not only need to be great players, but need to culture setters for the rest of the team to follow. Team USA's 19 year olds got the job done and you could see the confidence rubbing off on the younger guys. Confidence is critical, and the 19-year-olds are the ones who impart it. Most 17-18 year olds are often amazed at the major difference in game speed at this tournament from the level where they are playing normally, and that speed difference can really mess with younger players who haven't seen it before. Faster reads-and reactions force players to make more decisions, more quickly, so having great "hockey sense" is what coaches look for as highly as skill when picking guys, and following the 19-year-olds examples are usually how younger players adjust.
3) In one game knock-outs, a team's reloads, gap control, shot blocking and face-off wins take on outsized importance, often determining the kind of time and space that determines scoring opportunities for or against. Film sessions spend a lot of time on player roles as it relates to puck possession. These situations vary by national playing style, too.
4) Having high draft picks is very helpful, as elite skill can be difference makers when match-ups happen when with best-on-best, as you saw when Team USA top guys scored on Canada's top guys. But non-skilled self motivation, such as keeping your feet moving, having guts to get to dirty areas and willingness to do the little things are what elevates even the highly-skilled players over other highly skilled players, rather than just applying more skill.
5) Over the course of a tournament, your team's third line's effectiveness often can become the difference maker in advancing. If you can get offensive production from third line guys, that frees pressure on the top 6. Team USA's third line was really effective keeping pucks deep, drawing penalties, and getting to the dirty areas.
1) In a short tournament, you almost always need your goaltending to be elite to have a shot at it. Knight tossed a shoutout in the biggest game, and you cannot ask more from any goalie than to keep the opposing pucks out of the net. When skaters are confident in their goaltending, they are free to be more creative and dynamic to make plays.
2) Your 19-year olds not only need to be great players, but need to culture setters for the rest of the team to follow. Team USA's 19 year olds got the job done and you could see the confidence rubbing off on the younger guys. Confidence is critical, and the 19-year-olds are the ones who impart it. Most 17-18 year olds are often amazed at the major difference in game speed at this tournament from the level where they are playing normally, and that speed difference can really mess with younger players who haven't seen it before. Faster reads-and reactions force players to make more decisions, more quickly, so having great "hockey sense" is what coaches look for as highly as skill when picking guys, and following the 19-year-olds examples are usually how younger players adjust.
3) In one game knock-outs, a team's reloads, gap control, shot blocking and face-off wins take on outsized importance, often determining the kind of time and space that determines scoring opportunities for or against. Film sessions spend a lot of time on player roles as it relates to puck possession. These situations vary by national playing style, too.
4) Having high draft picks is very helpful, as elite skill can be difference makers when match-ups happen when with best-on-best, as you saw when Team USA top guys scored on Canada's top guys. But non-skilled self motivation, such as keeping your feet moving, having guts to get to dirty areas and willingness to do the little things are what elevates even the highly-skilled players over other highly skilled players, rather than just applying more skill.
5) Over the course of a tournament, your team's third line's effectiveness often can become the difference maker in advancing. If you can get offensive production from third line guys, that frees pressure on the top 6. Team USA's third line was really effective keeping pucks deep, drawing penalties, and getting to the dirty areas.
Last edited:
Pavel Buchnevich
"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Even based on point production, he was 3rd in ES points, and first in 5 on 5 xP1.
Yes, the guy was acting like Turcotte was riding Zegras coattails... Zegras was dynamic but also Turcotte proved to be one of the best 2-way prospects and did his best work when it mattered most
heynowbababooey
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 2,810
- 3,052
Just noticed while rewatching the medal ceremony. Dylan Cozens took off his silver medal. What a sore loser.
Latest posts
-
-
Player Discussion Patrik Laine: Part 2 - Healthy Living Edition
- Latest: NotCommitted
-
