Goaltenders Drafted 1st Overall | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Goaltenders Drafted 1st Overall

If the Pens take Eric Staal they have the best forward core in the world for the next 20+ years.

Plus you can always trade that star forward for a starting goaltender if need be. Taking a goalie 1st overall is a stupid idea IMO.

Even a top 5 or 10 pick is usually Pejorative Slured.
 
If the Pens take Eric Staal they have the best forward core in the world for the next 20+ years.

I'm fairly certain that the Pens trading up to #1 was contingent on them taking Fleury. Florida preferred Horton to Staal and figured they could squeeze out some extra assets and still get Horton at #3. If the Pens took Staal, Florida probably wouldn't have risked Carolina taking Horton at #2.

And it's just conjecture, but hypothetically the 2003-04 Penguins with Eric Staal would have been slightly better. The Pens had the worst record in the league (58 points) but finished only one point ahead of both Chicago and Washington. Staal could have been the difference between having the #1 pick pre-lottery rather than say #2 or #3. Columbus was only 4 points behind the Pens as well.

Maybe in a different world, the Pens with Staal finish in the #3 spot and win the lottery for Ovechkin. Winning the 2004 lottery would have meant a reduction of their chances to win the 2005 lottery for Crosby.

Or if the Pens with Staal finished #2 and were bumped down to #3 after the lottery. Instead of Malkin, they'd probably end up with consensus #3 Cam Barker instead.

Plus you can always trade that star forward for a starting goaltender if need be. Taking a goalie 1st overall is a stupid idea IMO.

Even a top 5 or 10 pick is usually Pejorative Slured.

Generally I agree with your first statement, but the second one can be argued. It's a bad assumption that you're going to land a premium forward/defenseman if you hadn't taken a goalie. The tendency is to cherry pick the name of a player taken well after the goalie.

Here are the goalies taken in the top 10 since 1990 and the five players taken after them:

1993: Jocelyn Thibault (10th overall) - Brendan Witt, Kenny Jonsson, Denis Pederson, Adam Deadmarsh, Mats Lindgren

Thibault had an okay career but it's not like he sticks out like a sore thumb compared to the five skaters taken after him. Jonsson was great but returned to Sweden in his prime. Deadmarsh's career was cut short due to injury, as was Pederson's.

1994: Jamie Storr (7th overall) - Jason Wiemer, Brett Lindros, Nolan Baumgartner, Jeff Friesen, Wade Belak

Storr was a perennial goalie of the future for the Kings. He didn't pan out, but Friesen was the only above average player of that grouping.

1997: Roberto Luongo (4th overall) - Eric Brewer, Daniel Tkaczuk, Paul Mara, Sergei Samsonov, Nick Boynton

Islanders didn't benefit due to impatience, but I think Luongo's more than justified his draft spot.

1999: Brian Finley (6th overall) - Kris Beech, Taylor Pyatt, Jamie Lundmark, Branislav Mezei, Oleg Saprykin

Vaguely recall injuries wrecking Finley's career. 1999 proved to be a bad year for most folks. While the Preds didn't get much out of Finley, they would haven't done much better had they picked Beech or Lundmark like many expected going into that draft.

2000: Rick DiPietro (1st overall) - Dany Heatley, Marian Gaborik, Rusty Klesla, Raffi Torres, Scott Hartnell, Lars Jonsson (Islanders eventually traded up to #5 for Torres, so including Jonsson as the fifth guy here)

This one has been beaten to death. Perhaps the perfect storm for a bad pick here. Islanders unexpectedly won the lottery and moved from #5 to #1. Meanwhile DiPietro was a late addition to that draft class as he was originally slated for 2001, but gave up his college eligibility to enter a year early.

Simultaneously, the Devils were en route to winning the Cup with Brodeur's puckhandling prowess on display and many thought DiPietro might be even better in that regard. Also, the Islanders got new ownership who seemed to be very hands on with the selection. Unfortunately you heard stories about the new owners falling in love with DiPietro's "attitude" and "brashness" which maybe worked in the business world.

2000: Brent Krahn (9th overall) - Mikhail Yakubov, Pavel Vorobiev, Alexei Smirnov, Ron Hainsey, Vaclav Nedorost

This pick is usually unfairly pinned on Craig Button. Button was hired by Calgary as GM a couple weeks beforehand on the condition that Button would remain with Dallas through the draft process. So this pick was made by Calgary's incumbent staff.

Krahn didn't pan out, but only Hainsey out of that group became an regular NHLer.

2001: Pascal Leclaire (8th overall), Dan Blackburn (10th overall) - Tuomo Ruutu, Fredrik Sjostrom, Dan Hamhuis, Ales Hemsky, Chuck Kobasew, Igor Knyazev

Injuries doomed Leclaire's career over time. A freak injury abruptly ended Blackburn's career. Despite the ugly stats, Blackburn looked pretty good as a young goalie thrown to the wolves. Obviously Hamhuis, Ruutu, and Hemsky have churned out above average NHL careers.

2002: Kari Lehtonen (2nd overall) - Jay Bouwmeester, Joni Pitkanen, Ryan Whitney, Scottie Upshall, Joffrey Lupul, Pierre-Marc Bouchard

Technically Atlanta received a 3rd round pick to not pick Bouwmeester, so he was never a consideration for them. Injuries limited Lehtonen but nobody has questioned his ability.

2003: Marc-Andre Fleury (1st overall) - Eric Staal, Nathan Horton, Nik Zherdev, Thomas Vanek, Milan Michalek

In hindsight they probably go in a different direction, but Fleury does have a Cup to his credit.

2004: Al Montoya (6th overall) - Rusty Olesz, Alex Picard, Ladislav Smid, Boris Valabik, Lauri Tukonen

Took awhile for Montoya to establish himself as a backup, but he hardly the only 2004 top 10 pick that didn't meet expectations. Outside of Smid, I think all of these guys were available off the scrap heap.

2005: Carey Price (5th overall) - Gilbert Brule, Jack Skille, Devin Setoguchi, Brian Lee, Luc Bourdon

Many of us were shocked that Montreal passed on Brule. I'd imagine that Price is the first guy you'd take off that list today (RIP Bourdon).

The tendency is to cherry pick names, but if you list out the goalies with the other players taken immediately after them, it usually isn't that bad. Or at least, not "Pejorative Slured".
 
when a skater is somewhat of a disappointment respective of their draft position, they can still be a valuable player. if a goalie is a disappointment, ur kind of ****ed having average to below average goalie playing a huge role simply because their are a hell of a lot more skaters than goalies in the NHL.
 
high risk high reward still.

It's just that Goaltenders are more often projects considering you want to provide them the right development time.

Where forwards or defenceman can step in the nhl earlier due to more lines to ease in on.
 
No goalie has been picked as high as price has in 11 years, soon to be 12.
 
I remember me and my buddy being pissed off because MTL drafted Price at no5 as we already had the great Jose Theodore... We still laugh about it to this day!
 
2005: Carey Price (5th overall) - Gilbert Brule, Jack Skille, Devin Setoguchi, Brian Lee, Luc Bourdon

Many of us were shocked that Montreal passed on Brule.
I'd imagine that Price is the first guy you'd take off that list today (RIP Bourdon).

Actually, the habs didn't pass on Brule. The habs wanted to draft Brule, but Minnesota picked him at #4, so the habs drafted Price at 5th instead.
 
Actually, the habs didn't pass on Brule. The habs wanted to draft Brule, but Minnesota picked him at #4, so the habs drafted Price at 5th instead.

4. Minnesota - Benoit Pouliot
5. Montreal - Carey Price
6. Columbus - Gilbert Brule



Some fun behind the scenes video from Columbus. Unintentional comedy (around the two minute mark) when their scouts celebrate after Minnesota takes Pouliot at #4. One scout says "Brule or Kopitar (at #6 for Columbus)" then another scout responds "Beautiful!" Also a somewhat priceless response when they learn Montreal is taking Price.
 
I'm fairly certain that the Pens trading up to #1 was contingent on them taking Fleury. Florida preferred Horton to Staal and figured they could squeeze out some extra assets and still get Horton at #3. If the Pens took Staal, Florida probably wouldn't have risked Carolina taking Horton at #2.

And it's just conjecture, but hypothetically the 2003-04 Penguins with Eric Staal would have been slightly better. The Pens had the worst record in the league (58 points) but finished only one point ahead of both Chicago and Washington. Staal could have been the difference between having the #1 pick pre-lottery rather than say #2 or #3. Columbus was only 4 points behind the Pens as well.

Maybe in a different world, the Pens with Staal finish in the #3 spot and win the lottery for Ovechkin. Winning the 2004 lottery would have meant a reduction of their chances to win the 2005 lottery for Crosby.

Or if the Pens with Staal finished #2 and were bumped down to #3 after the lottery. Instead of Malkin, they'd probably end up with consensus #3 Cam Barker instead.



Generally I agree with your first statement, but the second one can be argued. It's a bad assumption that you're going to land a premium forward/defenseman if you hadn't taken a goalie. The tendency is to cherry pick the name of a player taken well after the goalie.

Here are the goalies taken in the top 10 since 1990 and the five players taken after them:

1993: Jocelyn Thibault (10th overall) - Brendan Witt, Kenny Jonsson, Denis Pederson, Adam Deadmarsh, Mats Lindgren

Thibault had an okay career but it's not like he sticks out like a sore thumb compared to the five skaters taken after him. Jonsson was great but returned to Sweden in his prime. Deadmarsh's career was cut short due to injury, as was Pederson's.

1994: Jamie Storr (7th overall) - Jason Wiemer, Brett Lindros, Nolan Baumgartner, Jeff Friesen, Wade Belak

Storr was a perennial goalie of the future for the Kings. He didn't pan out, but Friesen was the only above average player of that grouping.

1997: Roberto Luongo (4th overall) - Eric Brewer, Daniel Tkaczuk, Paul Mara, Sergei Samsonov, Nick Boynton

Islanders didn't benefit due to impatience, but I think Luongo's more than justified his draft spot.

1999: Brian Finley (6th overall) - Kris Beech, Taylor Pyatt, Jamie Lundmark, Branislav Mezei, Oleg Saprykin

Vaguely recall injuries wrecking Finley's career. 1999 proved to be a bad year for most folks. While the Preds didn't get much out of Finley, they would haven't done much better had they picked Beech or Lundmark like many expected going into that draft.

2000: Rick DiPietro (1st overall) - Dany Heatley, Marian Gaborik, Rusty Klesla, Raffi Torres, Scott Hartnell, Lars Jonsson (Islanders eventually traded up to #5 for Torres, so including Jonsson as the fifth guy here)

This one has been beaten to death. Perhaps the perfect storm for a bad pick here. Islanders unexpectedly won the lottery and moved from #5 to #1. Meanwhile DiPietro was a late addition to that draft class as he was originally slated for 2001, but gave up his college eligibility to enter a year early.

Simultaneously, the Devils were en route to winning the Cup with Brodeur's puckhandling prowess on display and many thought DiPietro might be even better in that regard. Also, the Islanders got new ownership who seemed to be very hands on with the selection. Unfortunately you heard stories about the new owners falling in love with DiPietro's "attitude" and "brashness" which maybe worked in the business world.

2000: Brent Krahn (9th overall) - Mikhail Yakubov, Pavel Vorobiev, Alexei Smirnov, Ron Hainsey, Vaclav Nedorost

This pick is usually unfairly pinned on Craig Button. Button was hired by Calgary as GM a couple weeks beforehand on the condition that Button would remain with Dallas through the draft process. So this pick was made by Calgary's incumbent staff.

Krahn didn't pan out, but only Hainsey out of that group became an regular NHLer.

2001: Pascal Leclaire (8th overall), Dan Blackburn (10th overall) - Tuomo Ruutu, Fredrik Sjostrom, Dan Hamhuis, Ales Hemsky, Chuck Kobasew, Igor Knyazev

Injuries doomed Leclaire's career over time. A freak injury abruptly ended Blackburn's career. Despite the ugly stats, Blackburn looked pretty good as a young goalie thrown to the wolves. Obviously Hamhuis, Ruutu, and Hemsky have churned out above average NHL careers.

2002: Kari Lehtonen (2nd overall) - Jay Bouwmeester, Joni Pitkanen, Ryan Whitney, Scottie Upshall, Joffrey Lupul, Pierre-Marc Bouchard

Technically Atlanta received a 3rd round pick to not pick Bouwmeester, so he was never a consideration for them. Injuries limited Lehtonen but nobody has questioned his ability.

2003: Marc-Andre Fleury (1st overall) - Eric Staal, Nathan Horton, Nik Zherdev, Thomas Vanek, Milan Michalek

In hindsight they probably go in a different direction, but Fleury does have a Cup to his credit.

2004: Al Montoya (6th overall) - Rusty Olesz, Alex Picard, Ladislav Smid, Boris Valabik, Lauri Tukonen

Took awhile for Montoya to establish himself as a backup, but he hardly the only 2004 top 10 pick that didn't meet expectations. Outside of Smid, I think all of these guys were available off the scrap heap.

2005: Carey Price (5th overall) - Gilbert Brule, Jack Skille, Devin Setoguchi, Brian Lee, Luc Bourdon

Many of us were shocked that Montreal passed on Brule. I'd imagine that Price is the first guy you'd take off that list today (RIP Bourdon).

The tendency is to cherry pick names, but if you list out the goalies with the other players taken immediately after them, it usually isn't that bad. Or at least, not "********".

I know most people tend to ignore these long posts, but thanks for posting this. Very informative, if anything the early round goalie busts are due to a weak draft class than actually drafting a goalie early. I think most teams are hoping to get a Loungo or a Price when they draft them, and IMO they're arguably the best two players on the whole list. Actually, DiPietro is the only goalie pick that looks really bad.
 
I guess it's timing again. It's just recently no goalies were rated that high. Your not going to tell me you will pass up a chance on a Roberto Luongo level goalie or a Carey Price level goalie right? Yes I do have to agree some are crap shoots Brian Finley (6th overall) zero nhl games.
and Rick Dipietro (1st but he was rated like number 5 or 6 as I recall, that was suppose to be the Dan Heatly draft) and of course no one is going to pass up on Marty Broduer
 
In hindsight of course. But at the time they were drafted only one of those goaltenders was taken in round one. Look at which goalies were taken ahead of Lundqvist and Quick in their draft years and it proves the point of them being a crap shoot.

Ahead of Quick in 2005 saw big names like Tyler Plante, Jeff Frazee, Pier-Olivier Pelletier and Kristopher Westblom. The only good goaltender picked ahead of Quick were Price, Rask & Pavelic.

.

Umm... So you're saying 2/7 goalies picked ahead of Quick turned into FRANCHISE players, and another one into a pretty decent player? And that's 7 players spread out through 3 rounds of the draft?

What are the odds of landing a franchise forward or defenceman with a pick outside the top ~15 of the draft? Much lower than 2/7.

Don't take goalies with top 5-10 picks, I agree with that. But I don't see any problem with taking one with a late 1st or early 2nd rounder. Seems the odds of landing a Rask, Schneider, Varlamov, Dubnyk, Vasilevski, Gibson, Lehner, etc are relatively decent. Yea, you can find a Lundqvist or Rinne late in the draft, but teams throw a TON of picks at goalies late in the draft. The odds are much much worse.
 
The only question with the Pens not taking Fleury is who would have been their goaltender?

The next two goalie picks in '03 were Crawford(52) and Howard(64). Pittsburgh is a better team if they take any number of players that went in the top ten and Crawford/Howard/UFA goalie/Trade, maybe they don't get Crosby/Malkin, but there are a lot of ways to get a goalie besides no.1.
 
The next two goalie picks in '03 were Crawford(52) and Howard(64). Pittsburgh is a better team if they take any number of players that went in the top ten and Crawford/Howard/UFA goalie/Trade, maybe they don't get Crosby/Malkin, but there are a lot of ways to get a goalie besides no.1.

It's kinda funny to think about, but at the time Nik Zherdev was probably BPA (from what I recall, there was a perceived tier drop after Zherdev) on most people's boards if the Penguins had stayed at #3. Not sure if they're a better team with Zherdev over Fleury.

Like I said earlier in the thread, it's easy to play the hindsight game especially with goalies.
 
It's kinda funny to think about, but at the time Nik Zherdev was probably BPA (from what I recall, there was a perceived tier drop after Zherdev) on most people's boards if the Penguins had stayed at #3. Not sure if they're a better team with Zherdev over Fleury.

Like I said earlier in the thread, it's easy to play the hindsight game especially with goalies.

Does Zherdev develop the same in Pittsburgh and away from Howson and Hitchcock though? He did have some decent seasons hitting 61 and 58 points maybe he's a different player in Pittsburgh.
 
Washington has been a goaltender factory for awhile now, even before Korn was on board. I don't know if that's a product of a particular scout having an amazing eye for future netminding talent or if it's been lucky.

Varlamov(1st round), Neuvirth(2nd round) and Holtby(4th round) were all in the organization and NHL ready at the same time at young ages. Obviously we know who turned out the best of them all. Now we have Holtby Grubauer(4th round) and the best goaltending prospect in the world in Samsonov(1st round) and another pretty darn good prospect in Vanacek(2nd round) in the AHL.

Also I'll throw Pheonix Copley in there too since we signed him as a college UFA. Turned him into a vital piece of the trade that brought Oshie here.

Seems like certain teams just nail it with goalies and others have been on the hunt for one for long periods of time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad