Sgt Brylin
Trade is one for one
- Dec 28, 2012
- 795
- 302
Id be okay offering Husso a two year, high priced contractSo basically...
...Husso who's played less than 100 NHL games.
...Campbell whose body is shot and headed straight for Coryville.
...Kuemper how just won a cup with a below .900%.
Not thrilled about either option. I'd much rather try the trade market.
Of the three, Husso is the only one that's not going to royally disappoint me. Giving huge money and term to either of the two others is going to be such a monumental failure by Fitz. Campbell wants 4x5.5/6 and if we're the ones giving it to them, we might as well trade for Brent Burns while we're at it.Id be okay offering Husso a two year, high priced contract
We dont need the money the next two years and itd be a great way to secure a 1b/backup while not suffering a poor deal with term. Theyd want the higher dollar to pass on term as well
Two years at 6-7m per. Seems egregious but its a sly way to use our cap space without digging too far into the future. Helps us out in a crucial spot as well.
Maybe Husso wouldnt want that but itd be hard to pass up, the ability to make more in two seasons than he could on a four year deal most likely
Where is this about Campbell's body being shot and headed for Coryville coming from?So basically...
...Husso who's played less than 100 NHL games.
...Campbell whose body is shot and headed straight for Coryville.
...Kuemper how just won a cup with a below .900%.
Not thrilled about either option. I'd much rather try the trade market.
Toronto media, Campbell literally couldn’t train with the team most of the year because of all his maintenance days. He’s been described as finishing most games in pain. Whether it’s hyperbole, rumours or true, I’d be extremely worried handing out term to that kind of reputation.Where is this about Campbell's body being shot and headed for Coryville coming from?
I would actually say that description would better fit Kuemper than Campbell.
We've gotta do something or it's
....Blackwood, who's had a 55 game stretch of career careening goaltending that rivals the ghosts of Brodeur and Schneider, as well as the nervous breakdown of Kinkaid after he played about 60 (or was it more?) NHL games in a one year span.
....Bernier, who is 34 years old and has been out for 6 months with a hip injury/surgery, who Fitz even say ''May or may not'' be ready by the start of the season anyway.
....Daws, who's nowhere near NHL ready and proved it down the stretch after his very short hot streak.
Just reliving this shit is enough to give me an explosive bowel movement.
Fair enoughToronto media, Campbell literally couldn’t train with the team most of the year because of all his maintenance days. He’s been described as finishing most games in pain. Whether it’s hyperbole, rumours or true, I’d be extremely worried handing out term to that kind of reputation.
That ain't much better...that's the problem. I can't trust Blackwood at this point, especially healthwise, not to mention the dude doesn't even want to be here. But the alternatives are just as shitty in one way or another.So basically...
...Husso who's played less than 100 NHL games.
...Campbell whose body is shot and headed straight for Coryville.
...Kuemper how just won a cup with a below .900%.
Not thrilled about either option. I'd much rather try the trade market.
It really does not matter if Blackwood wants to play here. He will be very motivated this upcoming season. He will not get anything on his next contract if he has another bad year. Would not surprise me at all if he clearly outplays whoever we bring in this year to challenge him.That ain't much better...that's the problem. I can't trust Blackwood at this point, especially healthwise, not to mention the dude doesn't even want to be here. But the alternatives are just as shitty in one way or another.
It’s not necessarily that we could expect either Blackwood or Husso to be studs in goal for us.I don't know if I don't like Husso that much because of how bad he was in 20-21 (I remember thinking who the f*** is this jabroni? Probably some bozo that's only here for salary cap reasons cause he's cheap) or if it's just the limited sample size makes it an even bigger question mark. I think if he didn't have that 20-21 season (which was as bad as Blackwood's 21-22) maybe I would be a little more welcoming of him. I could easily see this tandem turning into the head case that was the Niemi-Lehtonen tandem which also featured Coach Combover at the helm. ''Well both these guys suck, so let's just see which one can suck less for the next little bit''.
If we had a borderline 1a/starter guy (Blackwood has NOT shown to be that in 2.5 calendar years now) then Husso would be a FINE pickup.
I don't have enough confidence in Blackwood to save the day if Husso falters.
Assuming the goalie we bring in plays well it would be great to have Blackwood play better. I just don't see that scenario happening.It really does not matter if Blackwood wants to play here. He will be very motivated this upcoming season. He will not get anything on his next contract if he has another bad year. Would not surprise me at all if he clearly outplays whoever we bring in this year to challenge him.
And there is the possibility that both schitt the bedIt’s not necessarily that we could expect either Blackwood or Husso to be studs in goal for us.
But, I think it’s fair and reasonable to expect that between the two of them we could at least get half-decent, much closer to average goaltending than we did last season. And then there’s the possibility of at least one of them being very good. Either by Husso continuing on last years form or Blackwood being healthy and breaking out.
They’re both youngish but not really young goalies with potential and looking at the obvious options right now I’m leaning towards that being my preference.
Sign Husso and let him and Blackwood show us what they can do, with Daws as the 3rd option and maybe even Bernier as an option somewhere down the road if he gets healthy.
Husso is somewhat unproven due to his small sample size but looking at him I think there’s a good chance he can at least be a 1B type of goalie.
That is a possibility with any goalie we acquire. But in all reasonable likelihood they will be at the very least a bit better than what we had this past season.And there is the possibility that both schitt the bed
They just got him. I doubt they'd trade him, but he probably has more value than any of their current three goalies. Maybe Adin Hill has more because he seems to have a higher ceiling.I'm honestly tempted to take a wager on Kaapo Kähkönen. Sharks need to offload one of their three goalies, and seems like they'd be content keeping Reimer/Hill. It's not a world breaker, but it's and upgrade and likely wouldn't cost the world. Might even help us get rid of Zacha.
Driving the price up. Are they at $6M with 5 years?
His issues (besides health) are all technique related - staying square to the puck, compact when he moves, not opening up or lifting the pads, being on the angles (he needs to be much better on that), crouching less when dealing with breakaways or shootouts . . . All of which can be worked on in an off season, all of which are coachable.It really does not matter if Blackwood wants to play here. He will be very motivated this upcoming season. He will not get anything on his next contract if he has another bad year. Would not surprise me at all if he clearly outplays whoever we bring in this year to challenge him.