GDT: [GM53] Vancouver Canucks vs Colorado Avalanche | Tue, Feb. 4th | 7pm | SNP | Hughes Dependent

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Chytil looks really good so far.
Best Joshua has looked all year

Debrusk looking like the last LW we signed out of Boston with a big contract...wake up geesh
 
  • Like
Reactions: dez
Petey’s confidence right now is just honestly shot, I really don’t understand how he did not get a shot in the arm when JT Miller got traded.

There has to be an injury
Not sure about this one.

Didn't he already miss 6 games... earlier this month?

If was still injured... wouldn't he just remain out of the lineup so he could continue healing?
 
Is 40 playing?
Yep, found a clip of him in the lockerroom

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: sting101
He legit played two good games this season.

Im not saying that as a huge criticism. He was injured at the start and then totally withdrawn, but “some” better be 2/35 or whateber.
He was our second leading scorer and on pace for 74 points over 82 games.

Just because he wasn't a 100-point player (nobody should expect anyone making 8 million to score 100 points) doesn't mean he only had "two good games."
 
He legit played two good games this season.

Im not saying that as a huge criticism. He was injured at the start and then totally withdrawn, but “some” better be 2/35 or whateber.
He actually quit on the team, again. The moment he got to NY he was suddenly 100% again.

And some here champion him as a hero...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana
Good period for the D, Chytil, and I'd argue Boeser as well. I just don't think he's a fit with Petey.

I would rather Tochett put the swede line back together at this point. Mix it up already, that first line clearly just doesn't work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana
He was our second leading scorer and on pace for 74 points over 82 games.

Just because he wasn't a 100-point player (nobody should expect anyone making 8 million to score 100 points) doesn't mean he only had "two good games."
It’s relative. Miller has said himself he doesn’t define himself by points and I’m not when I say that. I’m saying when he was winning battles, being a force.

he was that in like 90% of games LAST season. He was that in 10% this year. Total inverse.

Can you genuinely list me the games you think Miller played well by his own standard? Again, he was not good defensively at the start mid-injury (played like 21-22 miller) and then post-injury was mentally checked out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad