GDT: [GM49] Vancouver Canucks @ St. Louis Blues | Mon, Jan. 27th | 4:30pm | Amazon Prime | Sing Me a Sweet Tune

[Bgav]

Petey actually has 4 SOG. Its a xmas miracle

 

[platotld]

Or that f***ing Questrade ad, featuring 25 year olds who somehow have millions of dollars to invest with Questrade.

Know your audience you f***s.

even better they crap on their parents who got the riches to make them snotty rich kids and yet now they know better, its realkly what the ad wants to convey.. don't listen to what got you there do sometihing new and dumb !

 

[Peen]

what's for dinner tonight people

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

Can I interest you in an all inclusive trip to Utah instead?

How many wives are included?

 

[VanillaCoke]

Pls no turtle third

 

[SillyRabbit]

How many wives are included?

I said all inclusive, didn't I?

 

[FuzzyTitus]

Headline for this game: Petterson steals Miller's assist robbing him of a Gordie Howe hat-trick.

 

[Vector]

All I ask is for the Canucks to not give me a heart attack this period.

 

[bbud]

Doesn't sound like Alvin is going to trade either Miller or Petey

He shouldn't just to make a trade to placate the media if there is a trade that really makes this team better sure but not unless that's the deal

 

[Bourne Endeavor]

Glad this is on Prime so I can watch it later, but damn. Wasn't expecting us to being leading 4-1

So... is "kiss and makeup" back on the menu?

 

[bbud]

Keep pushing and win this one boys

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

Or that f***ing Questrade ad, featuring 25 year olds who somehow have millions of dollars to invest with Questrade.

Know your audience you f***s.

But they saved hundreds of thousands of dollars from investing in Questrade from the time they were in Kindergarten.

 

[M2Beezy]

Derrick Forbort

 

[DFAC]

Hoggy hit the ****ing net mate

 

[Bgav]

hoglander is terrible lol

 

[bbud]

Ep is looking better get one here

 

[platotld]

For giggles, I asked ChatGPT :

should the canucks trade miller , petterson or no one

ChatGPT said:​

It depends on the direction the Canucks want to take with their team. Let’s break it down:

1. Trade J.T. Miller​

• Why it makes sense:
  Miller is a high-impact player, but his long-term contract (7 years starting in 2023-24) could become problematic if the Canucks aren't contending soon. Trading him could bring back valuable assets to address weaknesses like defense or depth scoring.
• Why it doesn’t:
  He’s a leader and point producer, and moving him might signal a step back, which could frustrate the fanbase and teammates.

2. Trade Elias Pettersson​

• Why it makes sense:
  It really doesn’t unless Pettersson signals he won’t re-sign (his contract expires after 2023-24). Trading him could bring a massive return to kickstart a rebuild.
• Why it doesn’t:
  He’s a franchise player. Trading him would be a huge gamble and potentially set the team back years. Keeping Pettersson should be a top priority unless his future with the team is uncertain.

3. Trade No One​

• Why it makes sense:
  The Canucks already have a solid core with Pettersson, Hughes, Demko, and Miller. Instead of moving a big name, the focus could be on fixing depth issues and improving the defense through smaller moves.
• Why it doesn’t:
  If the team underperforms again, they could risk being stuck in mediocrity without addressing core weaknesses.

My Take:​

Unless Pettersson gives signals that he’s not staying, the Canucks should not trade him. Trading Miller might make sense if they can get younger, cheaper, and better balanced. If the goal is to contend soon, keeping both and tweaking the roster would be better.

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

I said all inclusive, didn't I?

Ya but how many? There’s a certain level of economies of scale.

 

[SillyRabbit]

I just watched Garland get a shot on goal, then hustle and chase down the defender who got the rebound and check him, keeping the puck in the zone.

This is exactly the effort we need if we want to make the playoffs.

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

For giggles, I asked ChatGPT :

should the canucks trade miller , petterson or no one

ChatGPT said:​

It depends on the direction the Canucks want to take with their team. Let’s break it down:

1. Trade J.T. Miller​

• Why it makes sense:
  Miller is a high-impact player, but his long-term contract (7 years starting in 2023-24) could become problematic if the Canucks aren't contending soon. Trading him could bring back valuable assets to address weaknesses like defense or depth scoring.
• Why it doesn’t:
  He’s a leader and point producer, and moving him might signal a step back, which could frustrate the fanbase and teammates.

2. Trade Elias Pettersson​

• Why it makes sense:
  It really doesn’t unless Pettersson signals he won’t re-sign (his contract expires after 2023-24). Trading him could bring a massive return to kickstart a rebuild.
• Why it doesn’t:
  He’s a franchise player. Trading him would be a huge gamble and potentially set the team back years. Keeping Pettersson should be a top priority unless his future with the team is uncertain.

3. Trade No One​

• Why it makes sense:
  The Canucks already have a solid core with Pettersson, Hughes, Demko, and Miller. Instead of moving a big name, the focus could be on fixing depth issues and improving the defense through smaller moves.
• Why it doesn’t:
  If the team underperforms again, they could risk being stuck in mediocrity without addressing core weaknesses.

My Take:​

Unless Pettersson gives signals that he’s not staying, the Canucks should not trade him. Trading Miller might make sense if they can get younger, cheaper, and better balanced. If the goal is to contend soon, keeping both and tweaking the roster would be better.

What does it say when you use DeepSeek?

 

[xtr3m]

 

[eviohh26]

Bummer dude.

 

[SillyRabbit]

Pettersson (EP40) failed to get the puck out twice and got his pocket picked...

 

[VanillaCoke]

Heinen again pathetic

 

[andora]

Im going to Ireland in March

Very nice, Heritage ties or personal interest? I'm hoping to take my wife to Scotland as a surprise later this year