I go the opposite way. I value Lapierre more. Maybe not 5x but 2x or 3x more valuable.
Many 1st round picks never make it to the NHL or play less than 50 games. Lapierre has done that. And he has played 4 playoff games (and played well). And he was MVP of Calder finals. That is a guy who will be an NHL player and hopefully grows enough this year to truly be our 3C next year.
Our first will be like 28OA or higher so basically a third 2nd round pick. And we have a lot of prospects trending NHL caliber. I’d be happy to move that pick for the right person.
Agreed. This is especially true for a very late 1st rounder (Caps 1st rounder right now would be 28th assuming they don't make the conference finals or finals).
In that range, it's basically a lottery ticket. You could just as easily get Pastrnak (25th overall) or Oettinger (26th overall) as you are to get Ryan Suzuki (29th overall) or Shane Bowers (28th overall). And, of course, there's a lot of in-between too. You could also get an okay player like Sam Steel (30th) or Noah Juulsen (26th).
My take on Lapierre is that he's basically guaranteed to be an NHL center. My only question is whether he's a 2nd line center or a 3rd line center. If you think he's a bust, then you get a valuation like 895's, but I think that's very unlikely given the information we have despite his bad 24-25.
They have more pedigree (mostly Dach), but I'd point to the returns for Alex Newhook and Kirby Dach as evidence that Lapierre is still worth more than a late 2025 first. Newhook was traded for a 1st and a 2nd (plus another fringe prospect) after a 14 goal 30 point (80 games played) campaign in his age 22 season. Dach returned a 1st* and 3rd after a 9 goal, 26 point (70 games played) campaign in his age 21 season.
*And the first was 13th overall.
Reminder that Lapierre had 8 goals, 22 points in 51 games last year in his age 21 season. That translates to 11 goals, 30 points over 70 games / 12.5 goals, 34.5 points over 80 games.
Edit: math error