kanucks25
Chris Tanev #1 Fan
The Canucks have been near the top of the league both years in xGA and at limiting high danger chances against, so the available data says otherwise.
Lankinen has been fine (average-ish) and Silovs terrible, whereas Demko was elite and that amounts to a huge difference.
I can accept that people can see things otherwise on the magnitude of the effect but I can’t realistically see how the difference isn’t at least 4-5 points in the standings so far, and more likely more than less.
I’m a bit surprised everyone dismisses this. Overall, we have not gotten good goaltending this year.
I think on the whole, goaltending has been at best average. So I don't disagree with the overall notion.
But IMO Lankinen himself has been better than "just fine" overall. He's had maybe a handful of bad games but pretty much every goalie that has started as many as he has (other than maybe Helly) has had some off nights.
And I believe the private numbers are more kind to Lankinen than the public, as the private numbers do a much better job of accurately assessing the environment around the goaltender and quality of scoring chances.
Not to mention, if I was to list the issues the team is having right now, it'd be like:
1. The defense
2. Whatever the hell is going on with Pettersson and Miller both on and off the ice
*giant chasm*
3. Goaltending