Tact
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2006
- 3,052
- 1,983
Wedgewood or Blackwood? Was that like over 5M?He’ll be looking at Wedgewood as a comparable, at least, IMO.
Wedgewood or Blackwood? Was that like over 5M?He’ll be looking at Wedgewood as a comparable, at least, IMO.
Yup. And you do that. No choice.You were probably hoping for the Stolarz deal, but now it's pretty rapidly approaching the Daccord deal.
Anything under five now is probably a good deal for the organization.
Wedgewood or Blackwood? Was that like over 5M?
I'm sure he meant BlackwoodWedgewood or Blackwood? Was that like over 5M?
Thankfully we have the best wood in the league, we can be proud of our woodSorry, yes - too much wood in the NHL.
I think it was $5.25.
It’s ok everyone.
The Canucks medical staff will get Demko back in no time.
I'm not sure if Demko's a guy who will go quietly into the night (unless it's really bad). Might end up with a team with cap/LTIR flexibility taking a flyer on a star goalie.We're at the point where you probably look at signing Lankinen long-term and LTIRing Demko to free up some cash to fix other spots on the roster.
If Hughes was on the ice during that 4-minute Oleksiak shift we probably score 5 different times.
It was about a random executive claiming Demko's hips were cooked. Ended up being right in conclusion, but the knee injury was a complete fluke. Single digit occurrence in sports history stuff.I always remember Frank Seravelli report about Demko and his style of play long term.
I think Joey Daccord getting the bag in limited sample size pushes it to at least 4-5M per.What is a realistic AAV to sign Lankinen for?
3M?
It was juulsen...........f*** if that was Tanev that injured Demko. Oh man.
What is a realistic AAV to sign Lankinen for?
3M?
It’s ok everyone.
The Canucks medical staff will get Demko back in no time.