Post-Game Talk: GM 63 | Stars def. Canucks | 4-1 (Forbort) | Damn you, goalposts.

[ephmrl]

I understand but our back end is a surplus of good assets right now and we need to use one to shore up the top 6.

Hughes, Hronek and MP29 ain’t going anywhere.

DPetey, Willander and Mancini are the cheap assets. Have to use one of them to address our weakness up front.

I get the logic, but I think we need a bigger sample size for both Mancini and Willander first.

 

[LemonSauceD]

Lekkerimaki manning the PP is nice to see.

 

[sting101]

Great start for Hoglander

 

[M2Beezy]

Man I love the Hog

 

[bbud]

Sneaky amount of skill, but a bit of an adventure defensively. Forbort is the perfect partner for him.

Just out of college he's big has wheels see skill needs some nhl time and coaching

 

[wonton15]

I love Hoglander

 

[eviohh26]

Standing up for a teammate taking a crosscheck is a penalty. fun

 

[dez]

No penalty on Wyatt? What a joke

 

[God]

how do the stars get a PP out of that? ridiculous

 

[LordBacon]

@bbud do your thing!

 

[ephmrl]

Wow, Tocchet actually yelling at the refs

 

[bbud]

Hey refs how much do you get bonuses for buttmans di.k up your a.s you sold out f.mks

 

[Shareefruck]

Any reason Lekkerimaki isn't on his shooting side on the PP though?

 

[Coffee]

Wow, Tocchet actually yelling at the refs

Tough love

 

[wonton15]

Dallas is an offensive powerhouse but the D core is so suspect they’d get killed in a WCF series vs Colorado/Edmonton tbh

 

[dez]

Any reason Lekkerimaki isn't on his shooting side on the PP though?

Bad coaching

 

[ProviesGhost]

I like Hoglander when he’s annoyed.

 

[Coffee]

Dallas is an offensive powerhouse but the D core is so suspect they’d get killed in a WCF series

They'll get killed tonight

 

[Bobby9]

I get the logic, but I think we need a bigger sample size for both Mancini and Willander first.

Need to find a team that has a surplus of high end forward prospects but a lack of D prospects and do a 1 for 1.

Somebody like Sennecke.

 

[bbud]

Refs need a boot to nuts you get buttmans shrivel balls at same time f em all

 

[sting101]

Good period loved the intensity

 

[ephmrl]

Canucks actually looked really good that period

 

[eviohh26]

Looks like we may have to beat the refs as well tonight.

 

[wonton15]

Reffing in that period was buttman bad

 

[andora]

Oh jesus

Canucks actually looked really good that period

was going to say this - legit good.

grit and work off the chart there - and pettersson um.. alive again?