Pre-Game Talk: GM 29 | Vancouver Canucks vs. Boston Bruins | Dec 14 | 7:00PM PST | SNET
- Thread starter Mr. Canucklehead
- Start date
No Brannstrom which is a shame but considering how well they played last game I can understand the decision.
Josepho
i want the bartkowski thread back
Would keep the same defensive lineup and then throw Brannstrom in against a faster Colorado team on Monday.
Mr. Canucklehead
Kitimat Canuck
Hard to argue with rolling the same crew into this one. I wonder if they go back to Demko, or ride with Lankinen given the shutout he just posted.
VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 26,485
- 13,269
Friedman has shown more in two games than Vincent has all season. 
EpochLink
Canucks and Jets fan
Either ride Lankinen tomorrow or give Demko the start. Or give Demko Boston and Lankinen Colorado, we got 2 capable goaltenders.
- Aug 28, 2011
- 18,202
- 23,066
Friedman has shown more in two games than Vincent has all season.
Desharnais is the Temu version of Zadorov.
Mr. Canucklehead
Kitimat Canuck
Friedman has shown more in two games than Vincent has all season.
He was everywhere against Florida. Very impressive game.
He really brings out the "I want to f***ing kill you" in everyone he plays against.
He was everywhere against Florida. Very impressive game.
He really brings out the "I want to f***ing kill you" in everyone he plays against.
Well, isn't that just...the perfect guy to have against Bruins?
the big nobody
Registered User
I say alternate between Demko and Lankinen until Demko is fully up to speed and able to take on the starting role again.
Think they should start Lanky coming off a shutout for this one.
I'd like to see them really slow play getting Demko back up to speed. Start with 1 start every 3-4 games and gradually increase it so it's 1 of 2 by the time playoffs get here.
Then evaluate how things are before deciding what the playoff rotation should be. And assuming both are playing at the top of their games, there should be a playoff rotation imo.
I'd like to see them really slow play getting Demko back up to speed. Start with 1 start every 3-4 games and gradually increase it so it's 1 of 2 by the time playoffs get here.
Then evaluate how things are before deciding what the playoff rotation should be. And assuming both are playing at the top of their games, there should be a playoff rotation imo.
I would pretty much alternate them the rest of the way.
I was just walking down Robson and I notice a girthy individual, look up, and it’s Nikita Zadorov doing some shopping. I guess they don’t have practice or anything to do today.
theguardianII
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2020
- 3,767
- 1,886
Shopping for a new home?
Will Sherwood "poke the Bear"?
Or should they just the bear hibernate?
They will be ornery after that as$ kicking.
They are still in the PO hunt there too
No Lindholm though not that he has been lighting it up.
The team looked pretty good rolling 4 lines. Shot against were not embarrassing either.
Lindholm is having a miserable season in Beantown, and is now on the shelf with an injury. And Zadorov just hasn't met expectations either.
Canucks dodged a huge bullet with these guys. They got what they needed out of them in the playoffs last season--but that was 'then', this is 'now'.
Canucks dodged a huge bullet with these guys. They got what they needed out of them in the playoffs last season--but that was 'then', this is 'now'.
I'm good with alternating the games - Demko on Saturday, Lanks on Monday, and so on.
Lankinen seems to thrive when he can get a rest between games. And Demko needs to stay active to get back to his former fab self. Further down the road, adjustments can be made with regard to who is the opposing team(s).
Lankinen seems to thrive when he can get a rest between games. And Demko needs to stay active to get back to his former fab self. Further down the road, adjustments can be made with regard to who is the opposing team(s).
Mr. Canucklehead
Kitimat Canuck
I feel badly for Lindholm. Don't wish either of those guys any ill will (except when they're playing us). What a nightmare start for Lindholm.
But that whole Bruins team is a bit of a mess right now. Hope they can stay that way on Saturday night. And they can keep staying that way as long as Marchand is still playing.
Quinning
Registered User
- Mar 18, 2008
- 27,148
- 14,905
Lindholm is a 45-55 point center that is paid like a 70-80 point center. He's never truly been that guy. He got paid off a stacked Calgary roster.
Chairman Maouth
Retired Staff
Oake should always defer to questions from anyone but himself. His questions are so shitty that they actually make my butthole cringe.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Value of: Connor Murphy to EDM (Double retention)
- Latest: OilerSuperstar17
