Ollie Weeks
the sea does not dream of you
- Feb 28, 2008
- 13,324
- 2,647
Did my eyes deceive me when I saw him make a hit at the center red line during a rush?Morty, why u step up at red line when facing 4 charging Red Wings?
Pearson and Toffoli both look uninvolved. I guarantee you Toffoli will score more once he cuts his hair tho.Kopitar’s line looks good as usual, Toffoli and Pearson have had some chances, everyone else looks like a monkey ****ing a football. Aside from the goal it was a pretty even period, that’s probably a bad sign since Detroit has been playing like **** lately.
Would you trust our D to cut off the cross pass? Especially considering the D was playing Brokeback Mountain in the neutral zone while Kopitar was stuck defending the 2-1?
First time I've read outnumbered attacks being blamed on goalies. Sure woulda been nice if he made the save, yeah, but that's hardly something I'd get on his case about.Quick is never at fault,get with the program, it's always the players around him that make Quick let in goals.Lol
Did my eyes deceive me when I saw him make a hit at the center red line during a rush?
Pearson and Toffoli both look uninvolved. I guarantee you Toffoli will score more once he cuts his hair tho.
he obviously has nothing to do with the formation of the 2 on 1, i have no idea why you think that i'm saying that. that's on the D for grossly overcommitting to the attack instead of peeling back and playing the zone they should be. worst case that should be a 3 on 3, letting it become a 2 on 1 is on the D.First time I've read outnumbered attacks being blamed on goalies. Sure woulda been nice if he made the save, yeah, but that's hardly something I'd get on his case about.
Sometimes I wish that Stevens and Sutter just traded places as head coach. Sutter's structure in the defensive zone is sorely missed.
he obviously has nothing to do with the formation of the 2 on 1, i have no idea why you think that i'm saying that. that's on the D for grossly overcommitting to the attack instead of peeling back and playing the zone they should be. worst case that should be a 3 on 3, letting it become a 2 on 1 is on the D.
he obviously has nothing to do with the formation of the 2 on 1, i have no idea why you think that i'm saying that. that's on the D for grossly overcommitting to the attack instead of peeling back and playing the zone they should be. worst case that should be a 3 on 3, letting it become a 2 on 1 is on the D.
he didn't fake shoot, he fake passedI think you're not giving enough credit to the shooter, basically.
Like I said, trust isn’t there for Quick, so he has to guess. Can’t say I blame him.he didn't fake shoot, he fake passed
you can't get played by a fake pass, you can't even commit pass as a goalie until the puck has left the stick. the pass is the backchecker's responsibility, not yours.
he didn't fake shoot, he fake passed
you can't get played by a fake pass, you can't even commit pass as a goalie until the puck has left the stick. the pass is the backchecker's responsibility, not yours.
I was kidding when I wrote that.Since it's being brought up,I noticed that it's more times than not blamed on the defense never Quicks,always a excuse for Quick letting goals in.First time I've read outnumbered attacks being blamed on goalies. Sure woulda been nice if he made the save, yeah, but that's hardly something I'd get on his case about.
I was kidding when I wrote that.Since it's being brought up,I noticed that it's more times than not blamed on the defense never Quicks,always a excuse for Quick letting goals in.
I smell a 6-1 Detroit victory if the kings keep playing like this.I smell a moral victory
Maybe if Muzzin shaves that chin fungus he'll actually get a shot on goal.