Gibson with a bonkers save

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Tbh it was more of an unreal clear. Don't think that was going in unless a Canuck crashed the net and got a stick on it but the no look reach back made sure it didn't happen. Cool play for sure.
 
Not to get picky, but he didn’t “snatch” it considering he didn’t catch it. Also the puck wasn’t going in with that trajectory. Also, it wasn’t that “bonkers”. It was a flexible guy batting a puck with his glove that was popped up
behind him.

So yeah. Not to get picky or anything.
1741234457483.jpeg
 
Not to get picky, but he didn’t “snatch” it considering he didn’t catch it. Also the puck wasn’t going in with that trajectory. Also, it wasn’t that “bonkers”. It was a flexible guy batting a puck with his glove that was popped up
behind him.

So yeah. Not to get picky or anything.

ScbVTXX.png
 
And? Call someone up, play a third goalie, try and get rid of the extremely expensive injury prone goalie with 2.5 years left.

Again demonstrating you have no idea about the Ducks. Gibson's cost means nothing to the Ducks, fighting for the playoffs for the first time in years is the top priority.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad