Token
Registered User
- May 15, 2019
- 582
- 660
This is the kind of data cherry-picking that leads to poor choices.It is a disease that has a 0.2 IFR. It affects people who are older and have serious issues. These are facts.
It’s not any kind of fact. It’s the current observation based on allot of extrapolated data.
IFR is a post-event analysis done as a study to further understand the scope and scale of the contagion. It is based on serological surveillance of the population at large and application of statistical models. In the peak of a pandemic we are not collecting this surveillance data! We are testing people with PCR tests for current infections! i.e. CFR!
Case Fatality Rate is what is overwhelming the healthcare system and it’s in the 3-4% range.
Choosing a metric just because it is lower and supports ones point of view doesn’t make it good judgment. Hubris is a better fit.