GDT: Slovakia-Canada 25.12, 3:30 p.m Local Time
- Thread starter 12# Peter Bondra
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
- Status
markov`
Registered User
I predict a 4-2 win by Canada.
Slovakia seems to have a better team than Finland or Switzerland. Canada will dominate them but Halak will stand out and Slovakia snipers (Ruzicka, Zagrapan, Lascek) won't have many shot, but they will score 2.
Slovakia seems to have a better team than Finland or Switzerland. Canada will dominate them but Halak will stand out and Slovakia snipers (Ruzicka, Zagrapan, Lascek) won't have many shot, but they will score 2.
Helmethead
Registered User
Wow i didn't realize how many chl players on this team! i predict 5-2 Canada and a good game for both teams.
7-4 Canada-high scoring fasted paced game.
Bergeron (2), Crosby, Stewart, Belle, Dawes, Carter
Zagrapan, Ruzicka (2), Kutny
Bergeron (2), Crosby, Stewart, Belle, Dawes, Carter
Zagrapan, Ruzicka (2), Kutny
6-3 Canada
For Canada: Dawes (2), Carter, Phaneuf, Stewart, Crosby/Perry
For Slovakia: Ruzicka, Zagrapan, Sekera
For Canada: Dawes (2), Carter, Phaneuf, Stewart, Crosby/Perry
For Slovakia: Ruzicka, Zagrapan, Sekera
3-2 Canada scores with 3 minutes left in the game (on PP), suprisingly low scoring. Canada has 3PP chances for and 7 penalties against.
Took a pill in Sbisa
2showToffoliIwascool
I just can't see that line of Crosby, Bergeron, and Perry being held off the scoresheet. I think they will dominate this tournament, like the Richards, Dawes and Stewart line did last year. I think that Canada will win in the 5-1 or 5-2 range, and I just feel with the exception of their goaltending, that this group is near flawless. They are prone to some mental lapses, but what team isn't. The Russians stack up best to meet them in the finals, but with these short tourneys, sometimes we have some upsets which come out of nowhere and make things real interesting. I don't like the Swedes chances at all, and Finland is just too young to really compete for a medal at this time. Going back to the goaltending issue, I feel that the last two years Canada should have won gold, but their goaltending let them down in the final, so we have to hope for the best.Leafaholix said:
ktownhockey
Registered User
4-1 Canada
SOG : 33 CAN 17 Slovakia
CAN: Crosby, Bergeron, Richards, Carter
SVK: Zagrapan
Pretty much another dominating effort by Canada... butttt after this game Sutter won't be that happy after a couple of defensive lapses in the third where the slovaks tally one and hit the post on another late chance...
SOG : 33 CAN 17 Slovakia
CAN: Crosby, Bergeron, Richards, Carter
SVK: Zagrapan
Pretty much another dominating effort by Canada... butttt after this game Sutter won't be that happy after a couple of defensive lapses in the third where the slovaks tally one and hit the post on another late chance...
Mess
Global Moderator
First I begin by :
Applying Pascal's Principle of Physics and the equation
PV = nRT
(knowing the mass and V(volume) & T(temperature) = Ice and its freezing point, P (pressure) = in the vacuum) ...(to determine the pressure on Canada to win)
Factor out the common denominator solved by dividing by the QUADRATIC Equation ....( ie. Net size compared to size of goalie in full equipment )
( x - h )² + ( y - k )² = r².
Keeping in mind that Albert Einstein's properties of ** E = MC² ** remains constant throughout ..
Then multiplying by the ALGORITHM to determine the Radius of the Circle r² ....(ie. Puck)
Mulipty by PI (~= pi = 3.14159) x R²
Apply the Square Root of Gold ....(Silver and Bronze may also be used but I have factored Canada winning the Tourney here)
Symbol: Au - on the Periodic Table whose Atomic number = 79
Finally solving for by using the simplistic Trigonometric formula ....(factoring in Shots on net, Scoring chances, Saves = goals)
cos A² - sin B² = 2 cos² - 1
Using the Pythagorean theory and rules solving for cos A
Which clearly then you don't need to be a Rocket Scientist to determine:
FINAL SCORE :
5-1 - Canada.
Canada: Bergeron (2), Carter (2), Dawes
Slovakia: Ruzicka
Scientifically correct with an error factor of +/- 1 goal ..
Applying Pascal's Principle of Physics and the equation
PV = nRT
(knowing the mass and V(volume) & T(temperature) = Ice and its freezing point, P (pressure) = in the vacuum) ...(to determine the pressure on Canada to win)
Factor out the common denominator solved by dividing by the QUADRATIC Equation ....( ie. Net size compared to size of goalie in full equipment )
( x - h )² + ( y - k )² = r².
Keeping in mind that Albert Einstein's properties of ** E = MC² ** remains constant throughout ..
Then multiplying by the ALGORITHM to determine the Radius of the Circle r² ....(ie. Puck)
Mulipty by PI (~= pi = 3.14159) x R²
Apply the Square Root of Gold ....(Silver and Bronze may also be used but I have factored Canada winning the Tourney here)
Symbol: Au - on the Periodic Table whose Atomic number = 79
Finally solving for by using the simplistic Trigonometric formula ....(factoring in Shots on net, Scoring chances, Saves = goals)
cos A² - sin B² = 2 cos² - 1
Using the Pythagorean theory and rules solving for cos A
Which clearly then you don't need to be a Rocket Scientist to determine:
FINAL SCORE :
5-1 - Canada.
Canada: Bergeron (2), Carter (2), Dawes
Slovakia: Ruzicka
Scientifically correct with an error factor of +/- 1 goal ..
Last edited:
Mess
Global Moderator
- Status
