Laval Rocket: GDT: Game FOUR Cleveland at Laval 7PM EST

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who cares about Cayden Primeau.

Like I said, AHL is supposed to be a developmental league.
Your best prospects should be getting all the primary minutes to develop their skills and get that experience needed for the NHL...

Fowler has a future with the Habs, not Primeau so he sits as long as it takes no questions asked... as it should be.

It should be the same for Reinbacher, Mailloux, Kapanen, Xhekaj and Beck... but Vincent is prioritizing Barre-Boulet, Dauphin, Simonneau, Condotta, Roy, Farrell, Trudeau, Lindstrom, etc. ... I don't like what I'm seeing...

It's like Pascal Vincent is prioritizing his own AHL record and will try to win it with the AHL Veterans so that he has a better chance to get a call from an NHL team...

He probably doesn't care if Reinbacher, Kapanen, Xhekaj and Beck aren't playing that much... he won't return with the Rockets if they win the AHL Cup and that's the only thing that matter to him at this point.

I guess that's the downside of hiring a veteran Coach for your AHL team that prioritize winning instead of developing your bluechip prospects.
Even if Primeau has no future with the Habs and Fowler does, and even if Primeau had a great second half of a season in Laval, Fowler may simply be the better goalie right now.

So playing Fowler may be what's both best for the future of the organization and what gives the Rocket the best chance to win now in the playoffs.
 
Loved the idea floated by one of the AC panelists -- why not hold Rocket playoff games at the Bell Centre? They all agreed that Bell Centre games would probably sell out.

Tough to get tickets at Place Bell right now so why not.
Did they melt the ice yet? They might have...
 
Hesitation is part of any 20 year old D.
They didn't have the option i memtioned.
No because it was a best of five. So to mitigate travel costs, they had the choice to start at home or not.

Maybe some can answer here, but I think it’s the same for the next round?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
Mailloux has the physicality and size to make a statement in the playoffs. I wonder how far he might be from the NHL. A lot of posters seem to think that he should be used in a trade but I don't know.

I'd rather keep him, but he is valuable and you have to give to get. If we can get a 2C stop gap and keep him, Hage, and Reinbacher.

I'm in, just not sure how we do that unless we go after something like Kadri 1.5MM retained. So when his play starts falling of he can be 3C at a reasonable cap hit.
 
Thing is this....he's a top 5 pick. Expectations comes from being a fine 2-way player at that spot. He's safe. Reliable. Good 1 on 1. He could become at best Slavvin. But Slavin, nobody was enticed by him at the draft. So hopefully we'll learn to like him as his career progresses. But he's never going to jump at you that much. He will win more Jacques Beauchamp trophies than Molson Cups...
RB is never going to be a fraction as spectacular as Hutson but he is effective. It’s not always easy to separate how useful a player is to the team to what we did to obtain him. Obvious examples are the heart churning deals of Dvorak and Anderson. On the one hand it’s not effective asset management, on the other hand they became very useful to us this season.

To be clear, I’m not critical of the fact we drafted RB at 5OA, just that he wouldn’t have been controversial if we would have drafted him at 10OA because, the more looks I get, the more I think he will massively help the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings
Hesitation is part of any 20 year old D.

No because it was a best of five. So to mitigate travel costs, they had the choice to start at home or not.

Maybe some can answer here, but I think it’s the same for the next round?
Best of 7 is the next round. Again, why couldn't the 1st two games be on home ice, the next 3 in Rochester and the last 2 back on home ice? I have seen AHL series done this way before.
I wasn't talking about this past round against Cleveland.
 
Best of 7 is the next round. Again, why couldn't the 1st two games be on home ice, the next 3 in Rochester and the last 2 back on home ice? I have seen AHL series done this way before.
I wasn't talking about this past round against Cleveland.
I thought the round vs Rochester was also a 5 game series
 
CHeers HFRocket!!!


1746625427386.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthew McConaughay
These are my brief observations about Game 4 which Laval won 4 -1 to close out their best of five series with Cleveland. The first 30 minutes of the game were probably the best I have seen the Rocket play this year and was a complete reversal from the very languid performance the team offered in Game 3. They were fast, aggressive and determined as they steamrolled to a quick 3-0 lead . They played, as the great Lawrence Taylor once implored his teammates to emulate: "Like a pack of wild dogs". The score could easily have been 5-0 or worse with a bit more finish around the net.

Here is my assessment of the play of our prospects:

Beck played a strong, intense two-way game on a line with Florian Xhekaj and Davidson. He was noticeable almost every shift. Beck showed great speed transporting the puck, on the forecheck and was around the Monsters' net all game long. Beck anticipated the play by jumping into openings on the ice and showed off his excellent shot on a number of occasions. With a little bit more finish, Beck would have scored 2 to 3 goals. This is the Beck that warranted a call up to the Canadiens this season and who will a core player for this team going forward.

Xhekaj was one of the best players on the ice and mostly played the wing on a line with Beck and Davidson which is a portend of his future role in the NHL. Xhekaj showed: above average straightforward speed, disruptive physicality (particularly on the forecheck), strength on the puck, a willingness to take a hit to make a play and a high hockey I.Q. and vision that allowed him to be effective on the penalty kill and make clever passes that created scoring chances and outlet passes that allowed Laval to exit their defensive zone. Its interesting to note that Xhekaj teamed up well with Beck. All season long I was complaining that Beck needed to play with players who could read/anticipate the play and get him the puck, or place the puck in a area where Beck could use his explosive speed. In Xhekaj, Beck was playing with such a player. Such is Xhekaj's vision and play making ability. He didn't play and key Brantford's Power Play last year because he's a mere thug. His skills are hugely underestimated just as his physicality is overrated. This kid will make the NHL because of his combination of size and skills. Xhekaj has NHL power forward written all over him and it would not surprise if he challenges for a roster spot as early as next year. If Xhekaj gains a bit more mass and gains that missing half-step of quickness he will be an important player for the Canadiens for the next decade. One criticism: Xhekaj has to show more discipline. In a game which Laval had well in hand, Xhekaj became belligerent and took an unnecessary penalty that created a 4 on 4 situation which favours offensive hockey as it creates more open ice, which is exactly what Laval didn't want at that stage of the game. He's a kid, but he has to be and play smarter at the next level.

Davidson, who was on the right wing on the Beck line, played a relentless, driving and physical game. He forechecked with urgency and his compete level kept the Monsters' defence on their heels and drew one penalty. After a bit of a lull in the level of his play, Davidson had a strong, pro-style game where he showed improved speed and was noticeable almost every shift.

After a very listless performance in Game 3, Farrell showed the same high level of play that made him one of Laval's ( and the AHL's) better players over the last 40 games of the season. Farrell showed excellent speed both with the puck and on the forecheck, played physical, blocked shots, went into the danger zone placing himself in position to receive passes creating several high quality scoring chances, and made the great pass that resulted in Laval's 4th goal. Probably the player that has improved the most this season, people shouldn't be surprised if Farrell is one of the young players that pushes for a roster spot on the Canadiens next fall. Whether with the Canadiens or with some other team, Farrell will be playing in the NHL, and playing soon.

I thought Kapanen played a very strong game, showing above average skating ability, good offensive vision and surprising strength with the puck and along the boards. Kapanen was good on face-offs and was responsible defensively. You could see the faith that the Laval coaches had in this young player as they used him extensively late in the game. I would be shocked if Kapanen doesn't make the Canadiens next year. He's already NHL ready and that readiness will give Hughes options going forward.

I don't want to rag on Roy, but he was Laval's least effective forward last night. He's simply not fast enough to be effective on a consistent basis at the AHL, let alone the NHL level. If your looking for a largely stationary forward with good offensive skills, Montreal already has Laine. I am afraid to say that the ship has largely sailed on Roy's chances of making the Canadiens. With Kapanen, Beck, Farrell, Xhekaj and Davidson pressing for roster spots, and Hughes most likely active on the trade and free agency market, there will be little or no room for this speed challenged, low intensity player.

On defence, Mailloux had one of his better , if not best games of the season, showing excellent offensive vision from the blueline, his elite stretch pass, good mobility with the puck, strong defensive positioning and his NHL level shot from the point. Mailloux was Laval's most noticeable defencemen (for good reasons) and was probably the best player on the ice other than the Cleveland goalie. While I am still concerned about Mailloux's lack of acceleration, he masked that deficiency by moving the puck quickly which allowed him to avoid Cleveland's forecheck pressure. All in all, it was a strong performance by Mailloux.

Trudeau, who again was paired with Mailloux, had a good game showing a high level of physicality and mobility. Trudeau made few errors in the defensive zone and was instrumental in Laval's first goal by attacking the net with the puck using his above average speed. Most importantly, Trudeau played a disciplined game, making the safe play and by not taking unnecessary penalties. His presence on the blue line adds a needed degree of mobility to Laval's defence.

Reinbacher played a safe, controlled but largely unremarkable game. His level of involvement (or lack thereof) in the offence was largely dictated by the fact that Laval was able to get a quick lead and Reinbacher was not needed to join the offence. Reinbacher used his good mobility to close gaps in the defensive zone and make plays at the offensive blueline. Reinbacher was strong along the boards and made few errors in the defensive zone.

Engstrom had a mixed game. He flashed his great mobility on a number of occasions in all three zones of the ice and picked his spots when to be engaged in the offence including once ringing a shot off the crossbar. This is a very talented player, but is still prone to creating grievous turnovers in his own zone through his careless handling of the puck. He sometimes eschews the safe play for a higher risk option. For those who worry about Matheson's occasional turnovers, Engstrom is going to cause you a heart attack. Twice last night, Engstrom turned over the puck creating grade "A" scoring chances for Cleveland. I almost had a heart attack.

Fowler was adequate last night, as he wasn't really overly challenged. I think the coaches have more faith in him than Primeau and, as such, the job as Laval's starting goalie is his, until he losses it.
 
Last edited:
These are my brief observations about Game 4 which Laval won 4 -1 to close out their best of five series with Cleveland. The first 30 minutes of the game were probably the best I have seen the Rocket play this year and was a complete reversal from the very languid performance the team offered in Game 3. They were fast, aggressive and determined as they steamrolled to a quick 3-0 lead . They played, as the great Lawrence Taylor once implored his teammates to emulate: "Like a pack of wild dogs". The score could easily have been 5-0 or worse with a bit more finish around the net.

Here is my assessment of the play of our prospects:

Beck played a strong, intense two-way game on a line with Florian Xhekaj and Davidson. He was noticeable almost every shift. Beck showed great speed transporting the puck, on the forecheck and was around the Monsters' net all game long. Beck anticipated the play by jumping into openings on the ice and showed off his excellent shot on a number of occasions. With a little bit more finish, Beck would have scored 2 to 3 goals. This is the Beck that warranted a call up to the Canadiens this season and who will a core player for this team going forward.

Xhekaj was one of the best players on the ice and mostly played the wing on a line with Beck and Davidson which is a portend of his future role in the NHL. Xhekaj showed: above average straightforward speed, disruptive physicality (particularly on the forecheck), strength on the puck, a willingness to take a hit to make a play and a high hockey I.Q. and vision that allowed him to be effective on the penalty kill and make clever passes that created scoring chances and outlet passes that allowed Laval to excite their defensive zone. Its interesting to note that Xhekaj teamed up well with Beck. All season long I was complaining that Beck needed to play with players who could read/anticipate the play and get him the puck, or place the puck in a area where Beck could use his explosive speed. In Xhekaj, Beck was playing with such a player. Such is Xhekaj's vision and play making ability. He didn't play and key Brantford's Power Play last year because he's a mere thug. His skills are hugely underestimated just as his physicality is overrated. This kid will make the NHL last year because of his combination of size and skills. Xhekaj has NHL power forward written all over him and it would not surprise if he challenges for a roster spot as early as next year. If Xhekaj gains a bit more mass and gains that missing half-step of quickness he will be an important player for the Canadiens for the next decade. One criticism: Xhekaj has to show more discipline. In a game which Laval had well in hand, Xhekaj became belligerent and took an unnecessary penalty that created a 4 on 4 situation which favours offensive hockey as it creates more open ice, which is exactly what Laval didn't want at that stage of the game. He's a kid, but he has to be and play smarter at the next level.

Davidson, who was on the right wing on the Beck line, played a relentless, driving and physical game. He forechecked with urgency and his compete level kept the Monsters' defence on their heels and drew one penalty. After a bit of a lull in the level of his play, Davidson had a strong, pro-style game where he showed improved speed and was noticeable almost every shift.

After a very listless performance in Game 3, Farrell showed the same high level of play that made him one of Laval's ( and the AHL's) better players over the last 40 games of the season. Farrell showed excellent speed both with the puck and on the forecheck, played physical, blocked shots, went into the danger zone placing himself in position to receive passes creating several high quality scoring chances, and made the great pass that resulted in Laval's 4th goal. Probably the player that has improved the most this season, people shouldn't be surprised if Farrell is one of the young players that pushes for a roster spot on the Canadiens next fall. Whether with the Canadiens or with some other team, Farrell will be playing in the NHL, and playing soon.

I thought Kapanen played a very strong game, showing above average skating ability, good offensive vision and surprising strength with the puck and along the boards. Kapanen was good on face-offs and was responsible defensively. You could see the faith that the Laval coaches had in this young player as they used him extensively late in the game. I would be shocked if Kapanen doesn't make the Canadiens next year. He's already NHL ready and will give Hughes options going forward.

I don't want to rag on Roy, but he was Laval's least effective forward last night. He's simply not fast enough to be effective on a consistent basis at the AHL, let alone the NHL level. If your looking for a largely stationary forward with good offensive skills, Montreal already has Laine. I am afraid to say that the ship has largely sailed on Roy's chances of making the Canadiens. With Kapanen, Beck, Farrell and Xhekaj and Davidson pressing for roster spots, and Hughes most likely active on the trade and free agency market, there will be little or no room for this speed challenged, low intensity player.

On defence, Mailloux had one of his better , if not best games of the season, showing excellent offensive vision from the blueline, his elite stretch pass, good mobility with the puck, strong defensive positioning and his NHL level shot from the point. Mailloux was Laval's most noticeable defencemen (for good reasons) and was probably the best player on the ice other than the Cleveland goalie. While I am still concerned about Mailloux's lack of acceleration, he masked that deficiency by moving the puck quickly which allowed him to avoid Cleveland's forecheck pressure. All in all, it was a strong performance by Mailloux.

Trudeau, who again was paired with Mailloux, had a good game showing a high level of physicality and mobility. Trudeau made few errors in the defensive zone and was instrumental in Laval's first goal by attacking the net with the puck using his above average speed. Most importantly, Trudeau played a disciplined game, making the safe play and by not taking unneeded penalties. His presence on the blue line adds a needed degree of mobility to Laval's defence.

Reinbacher played a safe, controlled but largely unremarkable game. His level of involvement (or lack thereof) in the offence was largely dictated by the fact that Laval was able to get a quick lead and Reinbacher was not needed to join the offence. Reinbacher used his good mobility to close gaps in the defensive zone and make plays at the offensive blueline. Reinbacher was strong along the boards and made few errors in the defensive zone.

Engstrom had a mixed game. He flashed his great mobility on a number of occasions in all three zones of the ice and picked his spots when to be engaged in the offence including once ringing a shot off the crossbar. This is a very talented player, but is still prone to creating grievous turnovers in his own zone through his careless handling of the puck. He sometimes eschews the safe play for a higher risk option. For those who worry about Matheson's occasional turnovers, Engstrom is going to cause you a heart attack. Twice last night, Engstrom turned over the puck creating grade "A" scoring chances for Cleveland. I almost had a heart attack.

Fowler was adequate last night, as he wasn't really overly challenged. I think the coaches have more faith in him than Primeau and, as such, the job as Laval's starting goalie is his, until he losses it.
Amazing that Xhekaj is the youngest player on this team. He has to get stronger, his skills are vastly underrated and his hockey IQ is very impressive. Like I have mentioned in previous posts he needs another year in Laval and needs about 10-15 pounds of bulk on his 195 LB frame.
 
Playing some ball hockey.

I'm tired and sore and out of shape as most of the guys are 10+ years younger, but a few around 10 years older.

But laval won.

Fowler back


Let's gooooo
Me too! I playedou ball hockey. Yesterday.

To decompressedou a lil bit.

Where didou you playedou ball hockey?!

I checkedou the score today morning. Directly. On this GDT.
 
These are my brief observations about Game 4 which Laval won 4 -1 to close out their best of five series with Cleveland. The first 30 minutes of the game were probably the best I have seen the Rocket play this year and was a complete reversal from the very languid performance the team offered in Game 3. They were fast, aggressive and determined as they steamrolled to a quick 3-0 lead . They played, as the great Lawrence Taylor once implored his teammates to emulate: "Like a pack of wild dogs". The score could easily have been 5-0 or worse with a bit more finish around the net.

Here is my assessment of the play of our prospects:

Beck played a strong, intense two-way game on a line with Florian Xhekaj and Davidson. He was noticeable almost every shift. Beck showed great speed transporting the puck, on the forecheck and was around the Monsters' net all game long. Beck anticipated the play by jumping into openings on the ice and showed off his excellent shot on a number of occasions. With a little bit more finish, Beck would have scored 2 to 3 goals. This is the Beck that warranted a call up to the Canadiens this season and who will a core player for this team going forward.

Xhekaj was one of the best players on the ice and mostly played the wing on a line with Beck and Davidson which is a portend of his future role in the NHL. Xhekaj showed: above average straightforward speed, disruptive physicality (particularly on the forecheck), strength on the puck, a willingness to take a hit to make a play and a high hockey I.Q. and vision that allowed him to be effective on the penalty kill and make clever passes that created scoring chances and outlet passes that allowed Laval to exit their defensive zone. Its interesting to note that Xhekaj teamed up well with Beck. All season long I was complaining that Beck needed to play with players who could read/anticipate the play and get him the puck, or place the puck in a area where Beck could use his explosive speed. In Xhekaj, Beck was playing with such a player. Such is Xhekaj's vision and play making ability. He didn't play and key Brantford's Power Play last year because he's a mere thug. His skills are hugely underestimated just as his physicality is overrated. This kid will make the NHL because of his combination of size and skills. Xhekaj has NHL power forward written all over him and it would not surprise if he challenges for a roster spot as early as next year. If Xhekaj gains a bit more mass and gains that missing half-step of quickness he will be an important player for the Canadiens for the next decade. One criticism: Xhekaj has to show more discipline. In a game which Laval had well in hand, Xhekaj became belligerent and took an unnecessary penalty that created a 4 on 4 situation which favours offensive hockey as it creates more open ice, which is exactly what Laval didn't want at that stage of the game. He's a kid, but he has to be and play smarter at the next level.

Davidson, who was on the right wing on the Beck line, played a relentless, driving and physical game. He forechecked with urgency and his compete level kept the Monsters' defence on their heels and drew one penalty. After a bit of a lull in the level of his play, Davidson had a strong, pro-style game where he showed improved speed and was noticeable almost every shift.

After a very listless performance in Game 3, Farrell showed the same high level of play that made him one of Laval's ( and the AHL's) better players over the last 40 games of the season. Farrell showed excellent speed both with the puck and on the forecheck, played physical, blocked shots, went into the danger zone placing himself in position to receive passes creating several high quality scoring chances, and made the great pass that resulted in Laval's 4th goal. Probably the player that has improved the most this season, people shouldn't be surprised if Farrell is one of the young players that pushes for a roster spot on the Canadiens next fall. Whether with the Canadiens or with some other team, Farrell will be playing in the NHL, and playing soon.

I thought Kapanen played a very strong game, showing above average skating ability, good offensive vision and surprising strength with the puck and along the boards. Kapanen was good on face-offs and was responsible defensively. You could see the faith that the Laval coaches had in this young player as they used him extensively late in the game. I would be shocked if Kapanen doesn't make the Canadiens next year. He's already NHL ready and will give Hughes options going forward.

I don't want to rag on Roy, but he was Laval's least effective forward last night. He's simply not fast enough to be effective on a consistent basis at the AHL, let alone the NHL level. If your looking for a largely stationary forward with good offensive skills, Montreal already has Laine. I am afraid to say that the ship has largely sailed on Roy's chances of making the Canadiens. With Kapanen, Beck, Farrell, Xhekaj and Davidson pressing for roster spots, and Hughes most likely active on the trade and free agency market, there will be little or no room for this speed challenged, low intensity player.

On defence, Mailloux had one of his better , if not best games of the season, showing excellent offensive vision from the blueline, his elite stretch pass, good mobility with the puck, strong defensive positioning and his NHL level shot from the point. Mailloux was Laval's most noticeable defencemen (for good reasons) and was probably the best player on the ice other than the Cleveland goalie. While I am still concerned about Mailloux's lack of acceleration, he masked that deficiency by moving the puck quickly which allowed him to avoid Cleveland's forecheck pressure. All in all, it was a strong performance by Mailloux.

Trudeau, who again was paired with Mailloux, had a good game showing a high level of physicality and mobility. Trudeau made few errors in the defensive zone and was instrumental in Laval's first goal by attacking the net with the puck using his above average speed. Most importantly, Trudeau played a disciplined game, making the safe play and by not taking unnecessary penalties. His presence on the blue line adds a needed degree of mobility to Laval's defence.

Reinbacher played a safe, controlled but largely unremarkable game. His level of involvement (or lack thereof) in the offence was largely dictated by the fact that Laval was able to get a quick lead and Reinbacher was not needed to join the offence. Reinbacher used his good mobility to close gaps in the defensive zone and make plays at the offensive blueline. Reinbacher was strong along the boards and made few errors in the defensive zone.

Engstrom had a mixed game. He flashed his great mobility on a number of occasions in all three zones of the ice and picked his spots when to be engaged in the offence including once ringing a shot off the crossbar. This is a very talented player, but is still prone to creating grievous turnovers in his own zone through his careless handling of the puck. He sometimes eschews the safe play for a higher risk option. For those who worry about Matheson's occasional turnovers, Engstrom is going to cause you a heart attack. Twice last night, Engstrom turned over the puck creating grade "A" scoring chances for Cleveland. I almost had a heart attack.

Fowler was adequate last night, as he wasn't really overly challenged. I think the coaches have more faith in him than Primeau and, as such, the job as Laval's starting goalie is his, until he losses it.
I find nothing to disagree with in this post.

One thing I have disagreed with you before is that to a certain extent you wrote off Mailioux because of his skating. To me that was not an issue (and it's fixable) as much as the mistakes he is prone to. Yesterday he made two of them and in my books that kept him to "very good", not excellent. Then again,, I'm rating these guys on NHL level hockey, as next Habs tope 4 defenseman, not AHL journeyman. That is why I only care what M, Rein and Engstrom does.

Pen him in as Savards replacement. He will be rough at first adjusting to NHL speed, but if you pair him with Math, they will be offensively scary...and scare us with lots of mistakes. Or Guhle for more stable pair. Or X for a beast but error prone pair. He also should be quarterbacking the second PP. His distribution is fast and accurate and his shot has NHL top level speed and would not be surprised if it comes in at or near 100mph...WITH the ability to find lanes and get through.

As for the Beck line...just pen them in for the Habs next season as a complete line. Sure, SMarty is going to need headache pills, but he's also got a hard playing, hard hitting, all out line that he should expect to re-define "energy" line. And they will score far more then their "fair share". LX is developing in a psycho power forward in the Tom Wilson kind of way, Beck has the speed/vision and Davidson is relentless digger and fearless net front presence.

BTW...pair X/M and the Psycho Line, then bring plenty of stretchers...

Add Demidov and that would be 5-6 rookies. Hopefully Rein and Engstrom improve as well as Fowler showing started level numbers...and our future looks brighter.

Anywho..lots of games left to see if M has left his recent past behind and...the Beck line is the real deal.
 
Last edited:
Best of 7 is the next round. Again, why couldn't the 1st two games be on home ice, the next 3 in Rochester and the last 2 back on home ice? I have seen AHL series done this way before.
I wasn't talking about this past round against Cleveland.
@dinodebino my apologies I just found out the series with Rochester is best of 5 and not best of 7. Again, my apologies of not knowing what I am talking about 🤣
 
Amazing that Xhekaj is the youngest player on this team. He has to get stronger, his skills are vastly underrated and his hockey IQ is very impressive. Like I have mentioned in previous posts he needs another year in Laval and needs about 10-15 pounds of bulk on his 195 LB frame.
If they’re serious about developing Florian they need to play him in the top 6 and first waive of PP. He’s never going to get those minutes once called up.
 
These are my brief observations about Game 4 which Laval won 4 -1 to close out their best of five series with Cleveland. The first 30 minutes of the game were probably the best I have seen the Rocket play this year and was a complete reversal from the very languid performance the team offered in Game 3. They were fast, aggressive and determined as they steamrolled to a quick 3-0 lead . They played, as the great Lawrence Taylor once implored his teammates to emulate: "Like a pack of wild dogs". The score could easily have been 5-0 or worse with a bit more finish around the net.

Here is my assessment of the play of our prospects:

Beck played a strong, intense two-way game on a line with Florian Xhekaj and Davidson. He was noticeable almost every shift. Beck showed great speed transporting the puck, on the forecheck and was around the Monsters' net all game long. Beck anticipated the play by jumping into openings on the ice and showed off his excellent shot on a number of occasions. With a little bit more finish, Beck would have scored 2 to 3 goals. This is the Beck that warranted a call up to the Canadiens this season and who will a core player for this team going forward.

Xhekaj was one of the best players on the ice and mostly played the wing on a line with Beck and Davidson which is a portend of his future role in the NHL. Xhekaj showed: above average straightforward speed, disruptive physicality (particularly on the forecheck), strength on the puck, a willingness to take a hit to make a play and a high hockey I.Q. and vision that allowed him to be effective on the penalty kill and make clever passes that created scoring chances and outlet passes that allowed Laval to exit their defensive zone. Its interesting to note that Xhekaj teamed up well with Beck. All season long I was complaining that Beck needed to play with players who could read/anticipate the play and get him the puck, or place the puck in a area where Beck could use his explosive speed. In Xhekaj, Beck was playing with such a player. Such is Xhekaj's vision and play making ability. He didn't play and key Brantford's Power Play last year because he's a mere thug. His skills are hugely underestimated just as his physicality is overrated. This kid will make the NHL because of his combination of size and skills. Xhekaj has NHL power forward written all over him and it would not surprise if he challenges for a roster spot as early as next year. If Xhekaj gains a bit more mass and gains that missing half-step of quickness he will be an important player for the Canadiens for the next decade. One criticism: Xhekaj has to show more discipline. In a game which Laval had well in hand, Xhekaj became belligerent and took an unnecessary penalty that created a 4 on 4 situation which favours offensive hockey as it creates more open ice, which is exactly what Laval didn't want at that stage of the game. He's a kid, but he has to be and play smarter at the next level.

Davidson, who was on the right wing on the Beck line, played a relentless, driving and physical game. He forechecked with urgency and his compete level kept the Monsters' defence on their heels and drew one penalty. After a bit of a lull in the level of his play, Davidson had a strong, pro-style game where he showed improved speed and was noticeable almost every shift.

After a very listless performance in Game 3, Farrell showed the same high level of play that made him one of Laval's ( and the AHL's) better players over the last 40 games of the season. Farrell showed excellent speed both with the puck and on the forecheck, played physical, blocked shots, went into the danger zone placing himself in position to receive passes creating several high quality scoring chances, and made the great pass that resulted in Laval's 4th goal. Probably the player that has improved the most this season, people shouldn't be surprised if Farrell is one of the young players that pushes for a roster spot on the Canadiens next fall. Whether with the Canadiens or with some other team, Farrell will be playing in the NHL, and playing soon.

I thought Kapanen played a very strong game, showing above average skating ability, good offensive vision and surprising strength with the puck and along the boards. Kapanen was good on face-offs and was responsible defensively. You could see the faith that the Laval coaches had in this young player as they used him extensively late in the game. I would be shocked if Kapanen doesn't make the Canadiens next year. He's already NHL ready and that readiness will give Hughes options going forward.

I don't want to rag on Roy, but he was Laval's least effective forward last night. He's simply not fast enough to be effective on a consistent basis at the AHL, let alone the NHL level. If your looking for a largely stationary forward with good offensive skills, Montreal already has Laine. I am afraid to say that the ship has largely sailed on Roy's chances of making the Canadiens. With Kapanen, Beck, Farrell, Xhekaj and Davidson pressing for roster spots, and Hughes most likely active on the trade and free agency market, there will be little or no room for this speed challenged, low intensity player.

On defence, Mailloux had one of his better , if not best games of the season, showing excellent offensive vision from the blueline, his elite stretch pass, good mobility with the puck, strong defensive positioning and his NHL level shot from the point. Mailloux was Laval's most noticeable defencemen (for good reasons) and was probably the best player on the ice other than the Cleveland goalie. While I am still concerned about Mailloux's lack of acceleration, he masked that deficiency by moving the puck quickly which allowed him to avoid Cleveland's forecheck pressure. All in all, it was a strong performance by Mailloux.

Trudeau, who again was paired with Mailloux, had a good game showing a high level of physicality and mobility. Trudeau made few errors in the defensive zone and was instrumental in Laval's first goal by attacking the net with the puck using his above average speed. Most importantly, Trudeau played a disciplined game, making the safe play and by not taking unnecessary penalties. His presence on the blue line adds a needed degree of mobility to Laval's defence.

Reinbacher played a safe, controlled but largely unremarkable game. His level of involvement (or lack thereof) in the offence was largely dictated by the fact that Laval was able to get a quick lead and Reinbacher was not needed to join the offence. Reinbacher used his good mobility to close gaps in the defensive zone and make plays at the offensive blueline. Reinbacher was strong along the boards and made few errors in the defensive zone.

Engstrom had a mixed game. He flashed his great mobility on a number of occasions in all three zones of the ice and picked his spots when to be engaged in the offence including once ringing a shot off the crossbar. This is a very talented player, but is still prone to creating grievous turnovers in his own zone through his careless handling of the puck. He sometimes eschews the safe play for a higher risk option. For those who worry about Matheson's occasional turnovers, Engstrom is going to cause you a heart attack. Twice last night, Engstrom turned over the puck creating grade "A" scoring chances for Cleveland. I almost had a heart attack.

Fowler was adequate last night, as he wasn't really overly challenged. I think the coaches have more faith in him than Primeau and, as such, the job as Laval's starting goalie is his, until he losses it.

Bustbacher :(
 
It was already posted in the pinned Laval thread but in case some of us didn’t see it, I’m reprising it here:


Thanks !

What happens if we buy tickets for the game #4, but the series ends after 3 games ?
Sorry for asking, I've never been to a playoffs game before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad