GDT: GDT #18 New York Islanders @ Seattle Kraken | November 16th | 4:00 PM | F/3-2 L

GOLFWANG

Registered User
Jul 20, 2007
4,494
1,489
I know that wasn’t the easiest shot for Brock but he has been shooting low too much and trying 5-hole when he can snipe corners. Ed have enough players shooting low

Dobson could have kept that in by pressing but Dobson is so bad at keeping pucks in
 

Chockey22

Registered User
Jul 12, 2022
304
236
An unfortunate loss, played pretty well but it’s hard to win when you only score two goals. I still think the refs got the call wrong on the goalie interference, given recent calls around the league but they’ve got to defend better than they did on that shift.
 

gordie43

Registered User
Nov 21, 2008
1,141
580
Two terrible bounces end up in the next for Seattle. Very unlucky.

Wish they would shoot a little more. Too much passing around the point when they have a tired defenders out there b
 

MJF

Hope is not a strategy
Sep 6, 2003
27,638
20,419
NYC
Not. That was a good challenge.
Nope. Don’t put your team shorthanded with 3 minutes left down by a goal unless it’s a slam dunk.

Besides there was only 1 contact by Tanev and Sorokin had time to right himself.
 

BrockLobster

Registered User
Feb 11, 2013
9,961
8,399
Long Beach, NY
Took me a bit to get into it this year. I finally do and immediately annoyed

Nope. Don’t put your team shorthanded with 3 minutes left down by a goal.

Besides there was only 1 contact by Tanev and Sorokin had time to right himself.

Agree. I didnt love the challenge either. It was pretty clearly a good goal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJF

Big L

Grandpa’s Cough Medicine is 180 Proof
Feb 7, 2013
12,503
6,743
CT
Remember when you couldn’t even have a toe in the crease? Ah those were the days. Brett Hull says hello

Nope. Don’t put your team shorthanded with 3 minutes left down by a goal unless it’s a slam dunk.

Besides there was only 1 contact by Tanev and Sorokin had time to right himself.
Or, it wasn’t a legit goal and its tied with 3 mins to go.
 

Tres Peleches

Johnny Turncoat
Jul 13, 2011
8,548
6,884
Nope. Don’t put your team shorthanded with 3 minutes left down by a goal unless it’s a slam dunk.

Besides there was only 1 contact by Tanev and Sorokin had time to right himself.
It was bang-bang. Even slowed down there wasn’t that much time

I don’t know how much it hindered him, hit even if it does the smallest amount you have to call it, because HE is the one he went into the crease of his own accord
 

Chockey22

Registered User
Jul 12, 2022
304
236
Nope. Don’t put your team shorthanded with 3 minutes left down by a goal unless it’s a slam dunk.

Besides there was only 1 contact by Tanev and Sorokin had time to right himself.
I see this perspective, but disagree. I figure that challenge is at least a 50-50 bet, whereas 3 minutes of even strength hockey to score one goal with this team is way less than 50-50
 

12Dog

Registered User
Feb 14, 2013
2,418
994
George is stronger than I thought
Didn’t look strong on their first goal
Got muscled

He’s a young kid, who looks to have a good future
Looks, poised, smart, can skate
Needs to def hit the gym, get some man strength
 

MJF

Hope is not a strategy
Sep 6, 2003
27,638
20,419
NYC
It was bang-bang. Even slowed down there wasn’t that much time

I don’t know how much it hindered him, hit even if it does the smallest amount you have to call it, because HE is the one he went into the crease of his own accord
Maybe if Nelson didn’t deflect it in the challenge would have been successful but you don’t make that gamble at that point of the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lek

Big L

Grandpa’s Cough Medicine is 180 Proof
Feb 7, 2013
12,503
6,743
CT
lol Roy is sweet, ripped the refs/nhl - there wasn’t enough interference 🤣 lolz awesome. ‘I guess I didn’t play enough games’
 

Throttle

Registered User
Sep 22, 2020
6,055
4,503
Strong road game. It’s an ‘acceptable’ loss and the team kept coming in the third, unlike the disheveled mess earlier in the season.

Nelson has to make that shot though.

Keeping it simple has been working.
 

Torrey Redux

Please!
Apr 25, 2022
375
297
Philadelphia, PA
Nope. Don’t put your team shorthanded with 3 minutes left down by a goal unless it’s a slam dunk.

Besides there was only 1 contact by Tanev and Sorokin had time to right himself.
It was the smart thing to do and it's not a close call. Given the uncertain nature of goalie challenges and what we saw it was probably 40/60 proposition that we would win the challenge. Compare that with the likelihood that we would score a goal in the last three minutes. League wide it is probably well under a 40 percent chance down a goal with 3 minutes left even for the best teams and god knows what it is for the Isles. Then throw in the likelihood of an empty net goal against. Nope, challenging gave the Isles the best chance to get to OT and it was unquestionably the right thing to do.
 

Tahoeblue

Registered User
Nov 29, 2019
1,055
625
Reno/Tahoe
Felt like the Isles deserved a better fate. Would have been nice to pop one in early as Palms and a few others had some good looks. That could have changed the complexion of the game. Sorry if this was asked earlier in the thread, but why wasn't that an interference call on Tolvanen with Cizikas?
 

RWWallpaper

Registered User
Mar 9, 2006
3,466
599
I think if a player makes contact with the goaltender in the crease, and does so of his own accord, there should be no goals allowed for a certain amount of time after that contact. 3 seconds, 5 seconds, whatever…Take your pick…otherwise, why have a goal crease at all? I also didn’t mind the challenge. I think there was a better chance of the goal being waived off than us scoring in the last 3 minutes.

That said, I don’t think that’s why we lost the game…just didn’t go our way.
 

Steve55

Registered User
Aug 21, 2005
3,416
451
Burnaby, BC, Canada
An unfortunate loss, played pretty well but it’s hard to win when you only score two goals. I still think the refs got the call wrong on the goalie interference, given recent calls around the league but they’ve got to defend better than they did on that shift.

Nope. Don’t put your team shorthanded with 3 minutes left down by a goal unless it’s a slam dunk.

Besides there was only 1 contact by Tanev and Sorokin had time to right himself.

Took me a bit to get into it this year. I finally do and immediately annoyed



Agree. I didnt love the challenge either. It was pretty clearly a good goal.
Initially I thought it was a good goal, but the only way I felt the Isles could have won if the NHL felt Tanev interferered with Sorokin enough, which was false. For goaltender interference challenges, I feel the ones that are worth challenging are: 1) When an offensive player is in the opposing goalie's crease to block his vision and a goal goes in. 2) When an offensive player clearly interferes with the opposing goalie right when a goal is scored.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad