Meh, it was a good penalty. Could have been a swedish one in addition too, but can't complain.I guess ref has a bet on Sweden![]()
For hooking maybe, but i've never seen a crosscheck where the player's stick is in front of the opponent :dMeh, it was a good penalty. Could have been a swedish one in addition too, but can't complain.
That has to be a game misconduct right? Finns are playing dirty
That has to be a game misconduct on Granlund right? Finns are playing dirty.
You have taken too many hits in the headThat has to be a game misconduct on Granlund right? Finns are playing dirty.
Can’t reason with you guys. Excusing every dirty finnish play. That was as clear as day. Dangerous and malicious.Seriously I recommend getting your eyes checked. Everyone can see that was an accident, those things happen in hockey.
The rules are rules, so game misconduct but no way that was intentional.
One single shot of the camera showed Granlund sticking his elbow against Holm in an active motion, so 5+ all right. Not like yesterday, when Voronkov was only supposed to get two minutes.
Can’t reason with you guys. Excusing every dirty finnish play. That was as clear as day. Dangerous and malicious.
Well it wasn'tCan’t reason with you guys. Excusing every dirty finnish play. That was as clear as day. Dangerous and malicious.
Accidental, but could have been avoided. 5+ is correct call.One single shot of the camera showed Granlund sticking his elbow against Holm in an active motion, so 5+ all right. Not like yesterday, when Voronkov was only supposed to get two minutes.